Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in rabbits

Clinical implant dentistry and related research

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 120-128

  Gotfredsen, Klaus ^a,b   Berglundh, Tord ^b   Lindhe, Jan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOLYSIS; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING;

ADULT; AGED; BONE RESORPTION; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 0035752209     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00002.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. 1 Bowers JT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DG, Michaels CM. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992 ; 7: 302–310.
2. 2 Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Underlying mechanisms at the bone biomaterial interface. J Cell Biochem 1994 ; 56: 340–347.
3. 3 Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials 1996 ; 17: 137–146.
4. 4 Lincks J, Boyan BD, Blanchard CR, et al. Response of MG63 osteoblast‐like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. Biomaterials 1998 ; 19: 2219–2232.
5. 5 Sutter F. The concepts of the ITI implants. In: Schroeder A, Sutter F, Buser D, Krekeler G, eds. Oral implantology, basics, ITI hollow cylinder system. 2nd Revised Ed. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag, 1996: 114–219.
6. 6 Gotfredsen K, Nimb L, Hjörting‐Hansen E, Jensen JS, Holmen A. Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TiO 2 ‐blasted titanium implants: an experimental study on dogs. Clin Oral Impl Res 1992 ; 3: 77–84.
7. 7 Carlsson L, Röstlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Removal torque for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988 ; 3: 21–24.
8. 8 Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991 ; 25: 889–902.
9. 9 Gotfredsen K, Wennerberg A, Johansson CB, Skovgaard LT, Hjørting‐Hansen E. Anchorage of TiO 2 ‐blasted, HA coated and machined implants: an experimental study in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1995 ; 29: 1223–1231.
10. 10 Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw‐shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Impl Res 1995 ; 6: 24–30.
11. 11 Wennerberg A. On surface roughness and implant incorporation. Thesis. University of Gothenburg, 1996.
12. 12 Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998 ; 13: 611–619.
13. 13 Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, et al. Influence of surface characteristics on the interface shear strength between titanium implants and bone: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999 ; 45: 75–83.
14. 14 Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface: a torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997 ; 8: 442–447.
15. 15 Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996 ; 11: 38–45.
16. 16 Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. An animal study of c.p. titanium screws with different surface topographies. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1995 ; 6: 302–309.
17. 17 Brånemark R, Öhrnell LO, Nilsson P, Thomsen P. Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration during healing: and experimental in vivo study in the rat. Biomaterials 1997 ; 18: 969–978.
18. 18 Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. A morphometrical and biomechanical comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992 ; 7: 62–71.
19. 19 Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1‐year follow‐up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987 ; 2: 69–75.