Pathologie myométriale

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 82, Issue 12 SUPPL., 2001, Pages 1819-1840

  Bazot, M ^a   Deux, J F ^a   Dahbi, N ^a   Chopier, J ^a  

^a HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

Author keywords

Uterus, abnormalities; Uterus, radiography

Indexed keywords

ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEIOMYOMA; MYOMETRIUM; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW; UTERUS CANCER; UTERUS DISEASE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; LEIOMYOMA; MYOMETRIUM; UTERINE DISEASES; UTERINE NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0035750448     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Ferenczy A. Anatomy and histology of the uterus corpus. In: Kurman RJ, editor. Blaustein's pathology of the female genital tract. 4th edn ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1994;327-6.
2. Brosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG. Uterine junctional zone: function and disease. Lancet 1995;346:558-60.
3. De Vries K, Lyons BA, Ballard G, Levi CS, Lindsay DJ. Contractions of the inner third of the myometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:679-82.
4. Lyons BA, Taylor PJ, Zheng XH, Ballard G, Levi CS, Kredenster JV. Characterization of subendometrial myometrial contractions throughout the menstrual cycle in normal fertile women. Fertil Steril 1991;55:771-4.
5. Rouvière H. Artères du tronc, Aorte. In : Delmas A, editor. Anatomie humaine, descriptive, topographique et fonctionnelle. 11 ed. Paris :Masson ;1974. p. 203-4.
6. Bazot M, Deligne L, Boudghene F et al. Anatomic approach to the parametrium: value of computed tomographic in vitro study compared to dissection. Surg Radiol Anat 1998;70:123-7.
7. Bazot M, Deligne L, Boudghène F, Buy JN, Lassau JP, Bigot JM. Correlation between CT and gross anatomy of the suspensory ligament of the ovary. Surg Radiol Anat 1999;21:341-6.
8. Fleischer AC, Kepple DM. Normal pelvic anatomy as depicted by various sonographic techniques. In: Fleischer AC, Javitt MC, Brooke Jeffrey R, Jr, Jones HW, III, editors. Transvaginal sonography of myometrial disorders. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997; 10-28.
9. Mitchell DG, Schonholz L, Hilpert PL, Pennell RG, Blum L, Rifkin MD. Zones of the uterus: discrepancy between US and MR images. Radiology 1990;174:827-31.
10. Fleischer AC, Cullinan JA. Transvaginal sonography of myometrial disorders. In: Fleischer AC, Javitt MC, Brooke Jeffrey R, Jr, Jones HW, III, editors. Clinical gynecologic imaging. 1st edn ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven 1997. p. 182-97.
11. Hricak H, Alpers C, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983;141:1119-28.
12. Mark AS, Hricak H, Heinrichs LW, et al. Adenomyosis and leiomyoma: differential diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1987;163:527-29.
13. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itoh K et al. Adenomyosis: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1988;166:111-4.
14. Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1996;199:151-8.
15. McCarthy S, Scott G, Majumdar S et al. Uterine junctional zone: MR study of water content and relaxation properties. Radiology 1989;171:241-3.
16. Scoutt LM, Flynn SD, Luthringer DJ, McCauley TR, McCarthy SM. Junctional zone of the uterus : correlation of MR imaging and histologic examination of hysterectomy specimens. Radiology 1991;179:403-7.
17. Brown HK, Stoll BS, Nicosia SV et al. Uterine junctional zone: correlation between histologic findings and MR imaging. Radiology 1991;179:409-13.
18. Schwalm H, Dubrauszky V. The structure of the musculature of the human uterus-muscles and connective tissue. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1966;94:391-404.
19. Brosens JJ, Barker FG, de Souza NM. Myometrial zonal differentiation and uterine junctional zone hyperplasia in the non-pregnant uterus. Hum Reprod Update 1998;4:496-502.
20. Turnbull LW, Manton DJ, Horsman A, Killick SR. Magnetic resonance imaging changes in uterine zonal anatomy during a conception cycle. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:330-1.
21. Burn P, McCall J, Chinn R, Healy J. Embolization of uterine fibroids. Br J Radiol 1999;72:159-61.
22. Yamashita Y, Harada M, Sawada T, Takahashi M, Miyazaki K, Okamura H. Normal uterus and FIGO stage I endometrial carcinoma: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1993;186:495-501.
23. Zaloudek C, Norris HJ. Mesenchymal tumors of the uterus. In: Springer-Verlag, editor. Blaustein's Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, 4th ed. ed. New York: Kurmann R J 1994. p. 487-527.
24. Novak ER, Woodruff JD. Myoma and other benign tumors of the uterus. In: Novak ER, Woodruff JD, editors. Novak's gynecologic and obstetric pathology. eds ed. Philadelphia: Saunders 1979. p. 260-79.
25. Fernandez H. In : CNGOF, editor. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique Prise en charge des fibromes utérins ; Paris : Massen 1999.
26. Lang EK. Arteriography in gynecology. Radiol Clin North Am 1967;5:133-49.
27. Fernstrom I. Arteriography of the uterine artery. Acta Radiol, suppl. 1955;122.
28. Smith RS. Pelvic arteriography in the differential diagnosis of pelvic mass. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971;111:952-8.
29. Pelage JP, Le Dref O, Soyer P et al. Arterial anatomy of the female genital tract: variations and relevance to transcatheter embolization of the uterus. AJR 1999;172:989-94.
30. Baltarowitch OK, Kurtz A, Pennell R, Needleman L, Vilaro MM, Goldberg BN. Pitfalls in the sonographic diagnosis of uterine fibroids. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:425-8.
31. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Zanotti F, Brioschi D, Carinelli S. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of adenomyoma versus leiomyoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:603-6.
32. Bazot M, Ghossain M, Buy JN, et al. Fibrothecomas of the ovary: CT and US findings. JCAT 1993;17:754-9.
33. Hricak H, Lacey C, Schriock E et al. Gynecologic masses: value of magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;153:31-7.
34. Oguchi O, Mori A, Kobayashi Y, Horiuchi A, Nikaido T, Fujii S. Prediction of histopathologic features and proliferative activity of uterine leiomyoma by magnetic resonance imaging prior to GnRH analogue therapy: correlation between T2-weighted images and effect of GnRH analogue. J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;21:107-17.
35. Mittl RL, Jr., Yeh IT, Kressel HY. High-signal-intensity rim surrounding uterine leiomyomas on MR images: pathologic correlation. Radiology 1991;180:81-3.
36. Ueda H, Togashi K, Konishi I, et al. Unusual appearances of uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging findings and their histopathologic backgrounds. Radiographics 1999;19:S131-45.
37. Yamashita Y, Torashima M, Takahashi M et al. Hyperintense uterine leiomyoma at T2-weighted MR imaging: differentiation with dynamic enhanced MR imaging and clinical implications. Radiology 1993;189:721-25.
38. Burn PR, McCall JM, Chinn RJ, Vashisht A, Smith JR, Healy JC. Uterine fibroleiomyoma: MR imaging appearances before and after embolization of uterine arteries. Radiology 2000;214:729-34.
39. Rotter AJ, Lundell CJ. MR of intravenous leiomyomatosis of the uterus extending into the inferior vena cava. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:690-3.
40. Kawakami S, Sagoh T, Kumada H et al. Intravenous leiomyomatosis of uterus: MR appearance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:686-9.
41. Papadatos D, Taourel P, Bret PM. CT of leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata mimicking peritoneal carcinomatosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:475-6.
42. Pattani SJ, Kier R, Deal R, Luchansky E. MRI of uterine leiomyosarcoma. Magn Reson Imaging 1995;13:331-3.
43. Murase E, Siegelman ES, Outwater EK, Perez-Jaffe LA, Tureck RW. Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics 1999;19:1179-97.
44. Casillas J, Joseph RC, Guerra JJ, Jr. CT appearance of uterine leiomyomas. Radiographics 1990;10:999-1007.
45. Ravina J, Bouret JM, Fried D et al. Advantage of pre-operative embolization of fibroids: about a multicentric set of 31 cases. Contracept Fertil Sex 1995;23:49-9.
46. Ravina J, Herbreteau D, Cigaru-vignerin N et al. Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata. Lancet 1995;346:671-2.
47. Ravina JH, Vigneron NC, Aymard A, Le Dref O, Merland JJ. Pregnancy after embolization of uterine myoma: report of 12 cases. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1241-43.
48. Azziz R. Adenomyosis: current perspectives. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1989;16:221-35.
49. Bird CC, Mc Elin TW, Manalo-Estrella P. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus-revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972;112:583-93.
50. Golberger MA, Marshak RH, Hermel M. Roentgen diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1949;57:563-8.
51. Walsh JW, Taylor KJ, Rosenfield AT. Gray scale ultrasonography in the diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis. AJR 1979;132:87-90.
52. Bohlman ME, Ensor RE, Sanders RC. Sonographic findings in adenomyosis of the uterus. AJR 1987;148:765-6.
53. Siedler D, Laing FC, Jeffrey RB, Jr, Wing VW. Uterine adenomyosis. A difficult sonographic diagnosis. J Ultrasound Med 1987;6:34-9.
54. Brosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG, Paraschos T, Winston RM. Endovaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri : identifying the predictive characteristics. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:471-4.
55. Ascher SM, Arnold LL, Patt RH et al. Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. Radiology 1994;190:803-6.
56. Atri M, Reinhold C, Mehio AR, Chapman WB, Bret PM. Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an in-vitro study. Radiology 2000;215:783-90.
57. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Arcaini L, Zanotti F, Carinelli S. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 1992;58:94-7.
58. Reinhold C, Atri M, Mehio A, Zakarian R, Aldis AE, Bret PM. Diffuse uterine adenomyosis: morphologic criteria and diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal sonography. Radiology 1995;197:609-14.
59. Vercellini P, Cortesi I, De Giorgi O, Merlo D, Carinelli SG, Crosignani PG. Transvaginal ultrasonography versus uterine needle biopsy in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis. Hum Reprod 1998;13:2884-7.
60. Vercellini P, Parazzini F, Oldani S, Panazza S, Bramante T, Crosignani PG. Adenomyosis at hysterectomy: a study on frequency distribution and patient characteristics. Hum Reprod 1995;0:1160-2.
61. McCausland AM, McCausland VM. Depth of endometrial penetration in adenomyosis helps determine outcome of rollerball ablation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1786-93;1793-4.
62. McCausland V, McCausland A. The response of adenomyosis to endometrial ablation/resection. Hum Reprod Update 1998;4:350-9.
63. Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I et al. Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology 1989;171:531-4.
64. Kang S, Turner DA, Foster GS, Rapoport MI, Spencer SA, Wang JZ. Adenomyosis: specificity of 5 mm as the maximum normal uterine junctional zone thickness in MR images. AJR 1996;166:1145-50.
65. Byun JY, Kim SE, Choi BG, Ko GY, Jung SE, Choi KH. Diffuse and focal adenomyosis: MR imaging findings. Radiographics 1999;19:S161-70.
66. Nghiem HV, Herfkens RJ, Francis IR et al. The pelvis: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo ME imaging. Radiology 1992;185:213-7.
67. Smith RC, Reinhold C, Lange RC, McCauley TR, Kier R, McCarthy S. Fast spin-echo MR imaging of the female pelvis. Part I. Use of a whole- volume coil. Radiology 1992;184:665-9.
68. Smith RC, Reinhold C, McCauley TR et al. Multicoil high-resolution fast spin-echo MR imaging of the female pelvis. Radiology 1992;184:671-5.
69. Krinsky G, DeCorato DR, Rofsky NM, et al. Rapid T2-weighted MR imaging of uterine leiomyoma and adenomyosis. Abdom Imaging 1997;22:531-4.
70. Clément de Givry S. Étude prospective du diagnostic d'adénomyose par IRM : comparaison des séquences d'acquisition en mode turbo spin echo, true fisp et de turbo inversion recuperation. Paris 1999.
71. Hricak H, Finck S, Honda G, Goranson H. MR imaging in the evaluation of benign uterine masses: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced T1-weighted images. AJR 1992;158:1043-50.
72. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Van Deerlin V. Adenomyosis: current concepts and imaging considerations. AJR 1998;170:437-41.
73. Ozsarlak O, Schepens E, de Schepper AM, Deckers F, Parizel PM, Campo R. Transient uterine contraction mimicking adenomyosis on MRI. Eur Radiol 1998;8:54-6.
74. Hendrickson MR, Kempson RL. Nonneoplastic conditions of the myometrium and uterine serosa. In: Bennington JL, editor. Surgical pathology of the uterine corpus, ed. Philadephia: Saunders, W B; 1990. p. 452-53.
75. Troiano RN, Flynn SD, McCarthy S. Cystic adenomyosis of the uterus: MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:1198-1202.
76. Kataoka ML, Togashi K, Konishi I et al. MRI of adenomyotic cyst of the uterus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:555-9.
77. Huang MW, Muradali D, Thurston WA, Burns PN, Wilson SR. Uterine arteriovenous malformations: gray-scale and Doppler US features with MR imaging correlation. Radiology 1998;206:115-23.
78. Joja I, Asakawa M, Motoyama K et al. Uterine cirsoid aneurysm: MRI and MRA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20:290-4.
79. Atzori E, Tronci C, Sionis L. Transvaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1996;42:39-41.