Diffuse and focal adenomyosis: MR imaging findings

Radiographics

Volumn 19, Issue SPEC.ISS., 1999, Pages

  Byun, Jae Young ^a   Kim, Sung Eun ^a   Choi, Byung Gil ^a   Ko, Gi Young ^a   Jung, Seung Eun ^a   Choi, Kyu Ho ^a  

^a The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Endometriosis, 854.3192; Leiomyoma, 854.315; Uterus, diseases, 854.3142, 854.317; Uterus, MR, 854.121411, 854.12143

Indexed keywords

ADENOMYOMA; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; UTERUS; UTERUS CANCER;

ADENOMYOMA; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; UTERINE NEOPLASMS; UTERUS;

EID: 0033209859     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.19.suppl_1.g99oc03s161     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Vercellini P, Ragni G, Trespidi L, et al. Adenomyosis: a deja vu? Obstet Gynecol Surv 1993; 48:789-794.
2. Azziz R. Adenomyosis: current perspectives. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1989; 16:221-235.
3. Bird CC, McElin TW, Manalo-Estrella P. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus-revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 112:583-593.
4. Benson RC, Sneeden VD. Adenomyosis: a reappraisal of symptomatology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1958; 76:1044-1061.
5. Arnold LL, Ascher SM, Simon JA. Familial adenomyosis: a case report. Fertil Steril 1994; 61:1165-1167.
6. Mark AS, Hricak H, Heinrichs LW, et al. Adenomyosis and leiomyoma: differential diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 163:527-529.
7. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itoh K, et al. Adenomyosis: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 166:111-114.
8. Lee JKT, Gersell DJ, Balfe DM, Worthington JL, Picus D, Gapp G. The uterus: in vitro MR-anatomic correlation of normal and abnormal specimens. Radiology 1985; 157:175-179.
9. Hricak H. MRI of the female pelvis: a review. AJR 1986; 146:1115-1122.
10. Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I, et al. Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 171:531-534.
11. Arnold LL, Ascher SM, Schruefer JJ, Simon JA. The nonsurgical diagnosis of adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86:461-465.
12. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Deerlin VV. Adenomyosis: current concepts and imaging considerations. AJR 1998; 170:437-441.
13. Novak ER, Woodruff JD. Novak's gynecologic and obstetric pathology with clinical and endocrine relations. 8th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1979; 280-290.
14. Hendrickson MR, Kempson RL. Surgical pathology of the uterine corpus. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1980; 452-467.
15. Tempany CMC, Yousuf N. Benign diseases of the uterus. In: Tempany CMC, ed. MR and imaging of the female pelvis. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book, 1995; 131-154.
16. Owolabi TO, Strickler RC. Adenomyosis: a neglected diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 1977; 50:424-427.
17. Ascher SM. Arnold LL, Patt RH, et al. Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. Radiology 1994; 190:803-806.
18. Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM, et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1996; 199:151-158.
19. Kang S, Turner DA, Foster GS, Rapoport MI, Spencer SA, Wang JZ. Adenomyosis: specificity of 5 mm as the maximum normal uterine junctional zone thickness in MR images. AJR 1996; 166:1145-1150.
20. Walsh JW, Taylor KJW, Rosenfield AR. Gray scale ultrasonography in the diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis. AJR 1979; 132:87-90.
21. Hricak H, Tscholakoff D, Heinrichs L, et al. Uterine leiomyomas: correlation of MR, histopathologic findings, and symptoms. Radiology 1986; 158:385-391.