Loss of rapid phonological recoding in reading Hanja, the logographic script of korean

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 785-790

  Kim, Jeesun ^a,b   Davis, Chris ^b  

^a Yeungnam University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; PHONETICS; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; READING;

ADULT; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; PHONETICS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; READING;

EID: 0035749099     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196218     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. CASTLES, A., DAVIS, C., & LETCHER, T. (1999). Neighbourhood effects on masked form-priming in developing readers. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14, 201-224.
2. DAVIS, C., CASTLES, A., & IAKOVIDIS, E. (1998). Masked homophone and pseudohomophone priming in children and adults. Language & Cognitive Processes, 13, 625-651.
3. FERRAND. L., & GRAINGER, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked nonword priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 353-372.
4. FORSTER, K. I., & DAVIS, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 689-698.
5. FORSTER, K. I., DAVIS, C., SCHOKNECHT, C., & CARTER, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 211-251.
6. GRAINGER, J., & FERRAND, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 218-233.
7. HILLINGER, M. L. (1980). Priming effects with phonemically similar words: The encoding-bias hypothesis reconsidered. Memory & Cognition, 8, 115-123.
8. KIM, J. (1998). Investigating phonological processing in visual word recognition: The use of Korean Hangul (alphabetic) and Hanja (logographic) scripts. Unpublished doctored dissertation, University of New South Wales.
9. KIM, J., & DAVIS, C. (in press). Using Korean to investigate phonological priming effects without the influence of orthography. Language & Cognitive Processes.
10. LABERGE, D., & SAMUELS, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
11. LUKATELA, G., & TURVEY, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331-353.
12. MEYER, D. E., & SCHVANEVELDT, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
13. NAM, K. (1995). Korean word recognition: Are different orthographies recognized differently? Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Texas, Austin.
14. PERFETTI, C. A., & TAN L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 101-118.
15. PLAUT, D. C., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (2000). Comment on Page, M. (2000). Connectionist modelling in psychology: A localist manifesto. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 4-89.
16. PLAUT, D. C., MCCLELLAND, J. L., SEIDENBERG, M. S., & PATTERSON, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and disordered reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
17. PRATERELLI, M. E., PERRY, K. E., & GALLOWAY, A. M. (1994). Automatic lexical access in children: New evidence from masked repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 346-358.
18. SCARBOROUGH, D. L., CORTESE, C., & SCARBOROUGH, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 1-17.
19. SHEN, D., & FORSTER, K. I. (1999). Masked phonological priming in reading: Chinese words depends on the task. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14, 429-459.
20. STONE, G. O., VANHOY, M., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 337-359.
21. STONE, G. O., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and systems principles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1248-1268.
22. TAFT, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. London: Erlbaum.
23. TAFT, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
24. TAFT, M., & VAN GRANN, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 203-224.
25. TAN, L., HOOSAIN, R., & PENG, D. (1995). Role of early presemantic phonological code in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, & Cognition, 2, 143-154.
26. TZELGOV, J., HENIK, A., SNEG, R., & BARUCH, O. (1996). Unintentional reading via phonological route: The Stroop effect with cross-script-homophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 336-349.
27. VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
28. ZIEGLER, J. C., VAN ORDEN, G. C., & JACOBS, A. M. (1997). Phonology can help or hurt the perception of print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 845-860.