Evaluation of a transoral delivery system for topical anesthesia

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 132, Issue 12, 2001, Pages 1714-1719

  Carr, Michele P ^a   Hortom, John E ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIDOCAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; TISSUE ADHESIVE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ANESTHESIA; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA, DENTAL; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIDOCAINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; TISSUE ADHESIVES;

EID: 0035747464     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0127     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Rosivack RG, Koenigsberg SR, Maxwell KC. An analysis of the effectiveness of two topical anesthetics. Anesth Prog 1990;37:290-2.
2. Yaacob HB, Noor GM, Malek SN. The pharmacological effect of Xylocaine topical anesthetic: a comparison with placebo. Singapore Dent J 1981;6:55-7.
3. Yaacob HB, Noor GM, Malek SN, Bin Mahfuz MA. The efficacy of Xylocaine topical anaesthetic in reducing injection pain. Med J Malaysia 1983:38:59-61.
4. Hersh EV, Houpt MI, Cooper SA, Feldman RS, Wolff MS, Levin LM. Analgesic efficacy and safety of an intraoral lidocaine patch. JADA 1996;127:1626-34.
5. Hutchins HS, Young FA, Lackland DT, Fishburne CP. The effectiveness of topical anesthesia and vibration in alleviating the pain of oral injections. Anesth Prog 1997;44:87-9.
6. Vongsavan K, Vongsavan N. Comparison of topical anesthetic gel and TENS in reducing pain (abstract 1841). J Dent Res 1996;75:248.
7. Carrel R, Friedman L, Binns WH. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a new topical anesthetic. Anesth Prog 1974;21:126-31.
8. Holst A, Evers H. Experimental studies of new topical anaesthetics on the oral mucosa. Swed Dent J 1985;9:185-91.
9. Svensson P, Petersen JK Anesthetic effect of EMLA occluded with Orahesive oral bandages on oral mucosa: a placebo-controlled study. Anesth Prog 1992;39:79-82.
10. Viekers ER, Punnia-Moorthy A. A clinical evaluation of three topical anaesthetic agents. Aust Dent J 1992;37:267-70.
11. Meechan JG, Winter RA. A comparison of topical anaesthesia and electronic nerve stimulation for reducing the pain of intra-oral injections. Br Dent J 1996;181:333-5.
12. Meechan JG, Thomason JM. A comparison of 2 topical anesthetics on the discomfort of intraligamentary injections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87:362-5.
13. Zed CM, Epstein J, Donaldson D. Topical liposome encapsulated tetracaine versus benzocaine: a clinical investigation (abstract 1840). J Dent Res 1996;75:247.
14. Gill CJ, Orr DL. A double-blind crossover comparison of topical anesthetics. JADA 1979;98:213-4.
15. Keller BJ. Comparison of the effectiveness of two topical anesthetics and a placebo in reducing injection pain. Hawaii Dent J 1985;16:10-1.
16. Martin MD, Ramsey DS, Whitney C, Fiset L, Weinstein P. Topical anesthesia: differentiating the pharmacological and psychological contributions to efficacy. Anesth Prog 1994;41:40-7.
17. Kincheloe JE, Mealiea WL, Mattison GD, Seib K. Psychophysical measurement on pain perception after administration of a topical anesthetic. Quintessence Int 1991;22:311-5.
18. Meechan JG, Donaldson D. The intraoral use of EMLA cream in children: a clinical investigation. ASDC J Dent Child 1994;61:260-2.
19. Meechan JG, Gowans AJ, Welbury RR. The use of patient-controlled transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation (TENS) to decrease the discomfort of regional anesthesia in dentistry: a randomised controlled clinical trial. J Dent 1998;26:417-20.
20. Roghani S, Duperon DF, Barcohana N. Evaluating the efficacy of commonly used topical anesthetics. Pediatr Dent 1999;21:197-200.
21. Meechan JG. Intra-oral topical anaesthetics: a review. J Dent 2000;1:3-14.
22. Noven Pharmaceuticals Inc. Introducing an advanced way to administer lidocaine (package insert). Miami: Noven Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 1997.
23. Farsakian LR, Weine FS. The significance of needle gauge in dental injections. Compendium Contin Educ Dent 1991;12:262-8.
24. Estafan DJ. Invasive and noninvasive dental analgesia techniques. Gen Dent 1998;46:600-3.
25. Houpt MI, Heins P, Lamster I, Stone C, Wolff MS. An evaluation of intraoral lidocaine patches in reducing needle-insertion pain. Compendium Contin Educ Dent 1997;18:309-16.
26. Stubbs PE. Evaluation of the analgesic effect of a lidocaine 20% patch versus placebo on pain during scaling and root planing. Periodontal Insights 1998;5:18-9.
27. Malamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1986:76-82.
28. Fuller NP, Menke RA, Meyers WJ. Perception of pain to three different intraoral penetrations of needles. JADA 1979;99:822-4.
29. Mollen AJ, Ficara AJ, Provant DR. Needles - 25 gauge versus 27 gauge - can patients really tell? Gen Dent 1981;29:417-8.
30. Friedman MJ, Hochman MN. A 21st century computerized injection system for local pain control. Compendium Contin Educ Dent 1997;18:995-1003.