Rights, culture, and cosmopolitan democracy

Communication Theory

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 434-453

  Jacobson, Thomas L ^a   Jang, Won Yong ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035735212     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00252.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Anderson, A. (1998). Cosmopolitanism, universalism and the divided legacies of modernity. In P. Cheah & B. Robbins (Eds.), Cosmopolitcs: Thinking and feeling beyond the nation (pp. 265-290). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
2. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3. Azzam, F. (1993). Non-governmental organizations and the UN world conference on human rights. The Review, International Commission of Jurists, 50, 89-100.
4. Balibar, E. (1995). Ambiguous universality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 7(1), 48-74.
5. Benhabib, S., & Dallmayr, F. (1990). The communicative ethics controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Bernstein, R. J. (1992). The new constellation: The ethical-political horizons of modernity/ postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Bohman, J. (1997). The public spheres of the world citizen. In J. Bohman, & M. Lutz-Machmann (Eds.), Perpetual peace: Essays on Kant's cosmpolitan ideal (pp. 179-200). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Boyle, K. (1995), Stock-taking on human rights: The world conference on human rights, Vienna, 1993. Political Studies, 43, 79-95.
9. Braman, S., & Sreberny-Mohammadi, A. (Eds.). (1996). Globalization, communication, and transnational civil society. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
10. Falk, R. (1987). The global promise of social movements: Explorations at the edge of time. Alternatives, 12, 173.
11. Featherstone, M., Lash, S., & Robertson, R. (Eds.). (1995). Global modernities. London: Sage.
12. Fernando, J. L., & Heston, A. W. (1997). Introduction: NGOs between states, markets, and civil society. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554, 8-20.
13. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). New York: Pantheon.
14. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109-142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Garnham, N. (1992). The media and the public sphere. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 359-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17. Gunther, K. (1993). The sense of appropriateness: Application discourses in morality and law. Albany: State University of New York Press.
18. Habermas, J. (1985). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.
19. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 2: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press.
20. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Habermas, J. (1992). Postmetaphysical thinking: Philosophical essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and application: Remarks on discourse ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Habermas, J. (1998a). Three normative models of democracy. In C. Cronin & P. De Greiff (Eds.), The inclusion of the other (pp. 239-252). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Habermas, J. (1998b). The inclusion of the other (C. Cronin & P. De Greiff, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Habermas, J. (1998c). Kant's idea of perpetual peace: At two hundred years' historical remove. In C. Cronin & P. De Greiff (Eds.), The inclusion of the other (pp. 165-202). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Habermas, J. (1999). The European nation-state and the pressure of globalization. New Left Review, 235, 46-59.
29. Halliday, F. (1995). Relativism and universalism in human rights: The case of the Islamic Middle East. Political Studies, 43, 152-167.
30. Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the global order: From the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31. Herskovitz, M. (1947). Statement on human rights. American Anthropologist, 49, 539-543.
32. Karim, K. H. (1999). Participatory citizenship and the Internet: Reframing access within the capabilities approach. Journal of International Communication, 6(1), 57-68.
33. Keohane, R. O. (2000). Hobbes's dilemma and institutional change in world politics: Sovereignty in international society. In D. Held & A. McGrew (Eds.), The global transformations reader: An introduction to the globalization debate (pp. 109-123). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
34. Krasner, S. D. (1995). Compromising Westphalia. International Security, 20(3), 115-151.
35. Laclau, E. (1995). Subject of politics, politics of the subject. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 7(1), 146-164
36. Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
37. Lyotard, J. (1984). The postmodern condition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
38. MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
39. McCormick, J. (1999). The role of environmental NGOs in international regimes. In J. Norman & R. S. Axelrod (Eds.), The global environment: Institutions, law, and policy (pp. 52-71). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
40. McGrew, T. (1992). A global society? In S. Hall, D. Held, & T. McGrew (Eds.), Modernity and its futures (pp. 62-102). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
41. Morrice, D. (2000). The liberal-communitarian debate in contemporary political philosophy and its significance for international relations. Review of International Studies, 26(2), 233-251.
42. Oldfield, A. (1990). Citizenship and community: Civic republicanism and the modern world. London: Routledge.
43. Otto, D. (1996). Nongovernmental organizations in the United Nation system: The emerging role of international civil society. Human Rights Quarterly, 18(1), 107-141.
44. Passerin d'Entrèves, M., & Benhabib, S. (Eds.). (1997). Habermas and the unfinished project of modernity: Critical essays on the "Philosophical discourse of modernity. Cambridge, MA: MTT Press.
45. Pye, L. W. (Ed.). (1963). Communications and political development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Rasmussen, D. (1982). Communicative action and philosophy: Reflections on Habermas' Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 9(1), 1-28.
47. Renteln, A. D. (1990). International human rights: Universalism versus relativism. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48. Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global change. London: Sage.
49. Rorty, R. (1998). Justice as a larger loyalty. In P. Cheah & B. Robbins (Eds.), Cosmopolites: Thinking and feeling beyond the nation (pp. 45-58). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
50. Schramm, W. (1964). Mass media and national development: The role of information in the developing countries. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
51. Scott, J. W. (1995). Universalism and the history of feminism. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 7(1), 1-14.
52. Stewart, J. (1948). Comments on the statement of human rights. American Anthropologist, 50, 351-352.
53. Tomlinson, J. (1994). Mass communication and the idea of a global public sphere: The political agenda of globalization. Journal of International Communication, 2(2), 57-70.
54. United Nations World Conference on Human Rights. (1993). World conference on human rights: The Vienna declaration and programme of action, June 1993. New York: United Nations Department of Public Information.
55. Walzer, M. (1994). Thick and thin: Moral argument at home and abroad. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.