Exploring black-white subgroup differences of managerial competencies

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 783-807

  Goldstein, Harold W ^b   Yusko, Kenneth P ^a   Nicolopoulos, Vasiliki ^a  

^a Department of Human Resources ^*

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035730041     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00232.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Austin JT, Villanova P. (1992). The criterion problem: 1917-1992. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 836-874.
2. Baron H, Janman K. (1996). Fairness in the assessment centre. In Cooper CL, Robertson IT (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 61-113). New York: Wiley.
3. Borman WC, Motowidlo SJ. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In Schmitt N, Borman W, and Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Cascio WF. (1991). Applied psychology in personnel management (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Chan D, Schmitt N. (1997). Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 82, 143-159.
6. Flanagan JC. (1953). Wesman Personnel Classification Test. In Buros OK (Ed.), The Fourth Mental Measurement Yearbook (pp. 432-433). Highland Park, NJ: The Gryphon Press.
7. Goldstein HW, Braverman EP, Chung B. (1993, April). Method versus content: The effects of different testing methodologies on subgroup differences. Paper presented at the Eighth Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc., San Francisco.
8. Goldstein HW, Yusko KP, Braverman EP, Smith DB, Chung B. (1998). The role of cognitive ability in the subgroup differences and incremental validity of assessment center exercises. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 51, 357-374.
9. Goldstein HW, Zedeck S, Goldstein IL. (in press). g: Is this your final answer? Human Performance.
10. Heath SB. (1989). Oral and literate traditions among Black Americans living in poverty. American Psychologist, 44, 367-373.
11. Helms JE. (1992). Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing? American Psychologist, 47(9), 1083-1101.
12. Hill OW, Clark JL. (1993). The personality typology of Black students: Evidence for a characteristic cognitive style? Psychological Reports, 72, 1091-1097.
13. Hough LM. (1994). Personality at work: Issues and evidence. Paper presented at the conference "Evaluating alternatives to traditional testing for selection," Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH.
14. Hough LM, Eaton NE, Dunnette MD, Kamp JD, McCloy RA. (1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595.
15. Huck JR, Bray DW. (1976). Management assessment center evaluations and subsequent job performance of White and Black females. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 29, 13-30.
16. Hunter JE, Hunter RF. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 72-98.
17. Jackson SE, Associates. (1992). Diversity in the workplace. New York: Guilford.
18. Jensen AR. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
19. Konz AM. (1988). A comparison of dimension ratings and exercise ratings in assessment centers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
20. Klimoski R, Brickner M. (1987). Why do assessment centers work? The puzzle of assessment center validity. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 40, 243-260.
21. Lubinski D. (2000). Scientific and social significance of assessing individual differences: "Sinking shafts at a few critical points." Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 405-444.
22. MacKinney AC. (1972). Wesman Personnel Classification Test. In Buros OK (Ed.), The Seventh Mental Measurement (pp. 722-723). Highland Park, NJ: The Gryphon Press.
23. McHenry JJ, Hough LM, Toquam JL, Hanson MA, Ashworth S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 43, 335-354.
24. Murphy KR. (1996). Individual differences and behavior in organizations: Much more than g. In Murphy KR (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 3-30). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Pulakos ED, Schmitt N. (1996). An evaluation of two strategies for reducing adverse impact and their effects on criterion-related validity. Human Performance, 9(3), 241-258.
26. Ones DS, Viswesvaran C. (1998). Gender, age, and race differences on overt integrity tests: Analyses across four large-scale applicant data sets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 35-42.
27. Reilly RR. (1996). Alternative selection procedures. In Barrett RS (Ed.), Fair employment strategies in human resource management (pp. 208-221). Westport, CT: Quorum.
28. Reilly RR, Chao GT. (1982). Validity and fairness of some alternative employee selection procedures, PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 35, 1-63.
29. Reilly RR, Henry S, Smither JW. (1990). An examination of the effects of using behavior checklists on the construct validity of assessment center dimensions. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 43, 71-84.
30. Rothstein MG, Paunonen SV, Rush JC, King GA. (1994). Personality and cognitive ability predictors of performance in graduate business school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 516-530.
31. Russell CJ. (1987). Person characteristic versus role congruency explanations for assessment center ratings. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 817-826.
32. Russell CJ, Settoon RP, McGrath R, Blanton AE, Kidwell RE, Lohrke FT, Scifries EL, Danforth GW. (1994). Investigator characteristics as moderators of selection research: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 163-170.
33. Sackett PR, Dreher GG. (1982). Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 401-410.
34. Schmidt FL. (1988). The problem of group differences in ability test scores in employment selection. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33, 272-292.
35. Schmidt FL. (1993). Personnel psychology at the cutting edge. In Schmitt N, Borman WC, Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 497-515). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36. Schmidt FL, Greenthal AL, Hunter JE, Berner JG, Seaton FW. (1977). Job sample vs. paper-and-pencil trades and technical tests: Adverse impact and examinee attitudes. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 30, 187-197.
37. Schmidt FL, Hunter JE. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
38. Schmitt N, Clause CS, Pulakos ED. (1996). Subgroup differences associated with different measures of some common job-relevant constructs. In Cooper CL, Robertson IT (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 115-139). New York: Wiley.
39. Sherwood JJ, Nataupsky M. (1968). Predicting the conclusions of negro-white intelligence research from biographical characteristics of the investigator. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18, 188-216.
40. Sweller J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
41. Sweller J. (1989). Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 457-466.
42. Taylor EK. (1953) Wesman Personnel Classification Test. In Buros OK (Ed.), The fourth mental measurement yearbook (pp. 433-434). Highland Park, NJ: The Gryphon Press.
43. Thayer PW. (1992). Construct validation: Do we understand our criteria? Human Performance, 5, 97-108.
44. Wesman AG. (1965). Manual for Wesman Personnel Classification Test. New York: The Psychological Corporation.