An analysis of 13 tourism surveys: Are three waves of data collection necessary?

Journal of Travel Research

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 356-368

  Crompton, John L ^a   Tian Cole, Shu ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; METHODOLOGY; TOURISM;

EID: 0035711990     PISSN: 00472875     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/004728750103900402     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Research note - Engagement as a criterion for defining homogeneous groups: Implications for mailed surveys
2. Nonrespondents in homogeneous groups: Implications for mailed surveys
3. Non-respondents in homogeneous groups: Implications for mailed surveys: A comment
4. Comments on the importance of late respondent and nonrespondent data from mail surveys
5. Response to mail surveys on resource-bases recreation topics: A behavioral model and an empirical analysis
6. Clues for reasons for non-response, and its effect upon variable estimates
7. Constructed markets
8. Homogeneity across mail survey waves: A replicated study
9. On generalizing about the need for follow-up efforts in mail recreation surveys
10. Portfolio development: Modeling destination adopters, inactives and rejecters
11. Sample non-response bias and aggregate benefits in contingent valuation: An examination of early, late and non-respondents
12. Influence of 13 design factors on completion rates to decennial census questionnaires
13. Effects of questionnaire length, respondent friendly design, and a difficult question on response rates for occupant-addressed census mail surveys
14. Response rates and mail recreation survey results: How much is enough?
15. Implications of non-response for the interpretation of mail questionnaire data
16. Overlooked biases in contingent valuation surveys: Some considerations
17. Improving coupon conversion studies: A comment
18. Exploring and correcting for non-response bias using follow-ups of non-respondents
19. Mail survey response rate: A meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response
20. Interim response to a mail questionnaire: Impacts on variable relationships
21. Response bias and the need for extensive mail questionnaire follow-ups among selected recreation samples
22. Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature
23. Comparing mail and telephone for conducting coupon conversion studies
24. Mail surveys and response rates: A literature review
25. Response rates and response content in mail versus face-to-face surveys
26. Response bias and wave analysis of mailed questionnaire in tourism impact assessments
27. Follow-up in international tourism mail surveys
28. Mailed questionnaire surveys and the reluctant respondent: An empirical examination of differences between early and late respondents
29. Testing for non-response and sample selection bias in contingent valuation
30. Sample bias in contingent valuation: A comparison of the correction methods
31. How serious is non-response bias in advertising conversion research?