메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 48, Issue 10, 2001, Pages 941-945

Assessing the impact of investigators' work: Beyond impact factors

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIOLOGY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LIBRARY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

EID: 0035691745     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03016581     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (11)

References (11)
  • 2
    • 0033584703 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Journal impact factor: A brief review
    • (1999) CMAJ , vol.161 , pp. 979-980
    • Garfield, E.1
  • 3
    • 0029783235 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How can impact factors be improved?
    • (1996) BMJ , vol.313 , pp. 411-413
    • Garfield, E.1
  • 5
    • 0031049280 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
    • (1997) BMJ , vol.314 , pp. 498-502
    • Seglen, P.O.1
  • 6
    • 0030460252 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The bibliographic "impact factor" of the Institute for Scientific Information: How relevant is it really for public health journals?
    • (1996) J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health , vol.50 , pp. 606-610
    • Porta, M.1
  • 7
    • 0007906956 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientific editing around the globe: Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine)
    • (2001) Science Editor , vol.24 , pp. 84-85
    • Walvoort, H.C.1
  • 9
    • 85037319536 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fact sheet. Loansome Doc®. Bethesda, MD: US National Library of Medicine; (last updated 2001 May 8; cited May 18). Available from: A document ordering feature of PubMed® (Internet)
    • (2001)


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.