In vitro CT comparisons of dissected phleboliths and retrieved ureteral calculi

Emergency Radiology

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 332-334

  Mindell, H J ^a   Herschorn, S D ^a   Dash, A ^a   Jackson, T L ^a   Sturtevant, N V ^a   Garra, B S ^a   Carroll, T ^a   Oliver, C ^a   Zeman, R K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Calculi; In vitro CT; Phleboliths

Indexed keywords

APPARATUS; ARTERY CALCIFICATION; ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; CALCULATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RATING SCALE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; TASK PERFORMANCE; URETER STONE;

EID: 0035682659     PISSN: 10703004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/PL00011934     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Diagnosis of acute flank pain: Value of un-enhanced helical CT
2. Acute ureteral obstruction, value of secondary signs on helical un-enhanced CT
3. The value of un-enhanced helical CT in the management of patients with acute flank pain
4. Acute flank pain: Comparison of non-contrast CT and IVU
5. Pictorial essay: The use of un-enhanced helical CT to evaluate suspected renal colic
6. Ureterolithiasis; value of the tail sign in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi at non-enhanced helical CT
7. Distinguishing pelvic phleboliths from distal ureteric stones on routine un-enhanced helical CT: Is there a radiolucent center?