Grading governance: Measuring and comparing clinical governance performance in primary care

Journal of Clinical Governance

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 193-200

  Houghton, G ^a   Munday, S ^a   Sproston, B ^a  

^a Birmingham Health Authority   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical governance; Performance indicator; Primary care group

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; MEDICAL AUDIT; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PERFORMANCE; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RELIABILITY; RESPONSIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0035670880     PISSN: 14675277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. A model for clinical governance in primary care groups
2. Accountability for clinical governance in primary care: Principles for performance management
3. A practical framework for developing clinical governance in primary care: Product of a Delphi consultation
4. Clinical governance in action: The first year - 6 reports from PCGs
5. Clinical governance in primary care: Early impressions based on the Bradford South and West Primary Care Group's experience
6. Improving the quality of care through clinical governance
7. Progress in clinical governance: Findings from the first NPCRDC National Tracker survey of primary care groups/trusts
8. Reporting clinical governance: Co-ordinating and clarifying clinical governance in primary care
9. Auditing audits: The method of Oxfordshire Medical Audit Advisory Group
10. Bristol, Shipman and clinical governance: Shewhart's forgotten lessons