메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 58, Issue 11, 2001, Pages 2284-2297

How robust are bayesian posterior inferences based on a Ricker model with regards to measurement errors and prior assumptions about parameters?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; FISH; RECRUITMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0035666011     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/f01-167     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (22)

References (36)
  • 1
    • 0029669055 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Results of Bayesian methods depend on details of implementation: An example of estimating salmon escapement goals
    • (1996) Fish. Res , vol.25 , pp. 155-170
    • Adikson, M.D.1    Peterman, R.M.2
  • 5
    • 0030436475 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An introduction to Bayesian inference for ecological research and environmental decision-making
    • (1996) Ecol. Appl , vol.6 , Issue.4 , pp. 1036-1046
    • Ellison, A.M.1
  • 7
    • 0026284364 scopus 로고
    • Escapement goals for sockeye salmon with informative prior probabilities based on habitat considerations
    • (1991) Fish. Res , vol.11 , pp. 239-256
    • Geiger, H.J.1    Koenings, J.P.2
  • 14
    • 4244204496 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Implication of Bayesian approach for simulating salmon population dynamic
    • Edited by F. Funk et al. University of Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska, AK-SG-98-01
    • (1998) Fishery stock assessment models , pp. 873-887
    • Hill, R.A.1    Pyper, B.J.2
  • 33
    • 0000033209 scopus 로고
    • A partial bias correction factor for stock-recruitment parameter estimation in the presence of auto-correlated environmental effects
    • (1990) Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci , vol.47 , pp. 516-519
    • Walters, C.J.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.