Indigenization and beyond: Methodological relationalism in the study of personality across cultural traditions

Journal of Personality

Volumn 69, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 925-953

  Ho, David Y F ^a   Peng, Si Qing ^b   Lai, Alice Cheng ^c   Chan, Shui Fun F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; CULTURAL FACTOR; ETHNIC GROUP; HUMAN; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; CULTURE; ETHNIC GROUPS; HUMAN; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T;

EID: 0035656389     PISSN: 00223506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-6494.696170     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bain, B. (1996). Pathways to the peak of Mount Piaget and Vygotsky: Speaking and cognizing monolingually and bilingually. Rome: Belzoni Editore.
2. Bennett, J. E., & Turner, J. (1977). Hemispheric laterality and cognitive style associated with Transcendental Meditation. Psychophysiology, 14, 293.
3. Chiu, C. Y., Krauss, R. M., & Lau, I. Y. M. (1998). Some cognitive consequences of communication. In S. R. Fussell & R. J. Kreuz (Eds.), Social and cognitive psychological approaches to interpersonal communication (pp. 259-276). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Chiu, C. Y., & Yang, C. F. (1987). Chinese subjects' dilemmas: Humility and cognitive laziness as problems in using rating scales. Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society, No. 18, 39-50.
5. Choi, S.-C., Kim, U., & Choi, S.-H. (1993). Indigenous analysis of collective representations: A Korean perspective. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 193-210). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Cooley, C. H. (1964). Human nature and the social order. New York: Schocken Books. (Original work published 1902)
7. Dansereau, F. (1989). A multiple level of analysis perspective on the debate about individualism. American Psychologist, 44, 959-960.
8. Doi, L. T. (1973). Omote and ura: Concepts derived from the Japanese 2-fold structure of consciousness. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 157, 258-261.
9. Enriquez, V. G. (1992). From colonial to liberation psychology: The Philippine experience. Quezon City: University of the Philippine Press.
10. Furby, L. (1979). Individualistic bias in studies of locus of control. In A. R. Buss (Ed.), Psychology in social context (pp. 169-190). New York: Irvington.
11. Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Gergen, K. J., Gulerce, A., Lock, A., & Misra, G. (1996). Psychological science in cultural context. American Psychologist, 51, 496-503.
13. Gielen, U. P. (2000). Commentary: Indigenous approaches: Heuristically useful but not without problems. International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development Newsletter, No. 1 (Serial No. 37), 10-11.
14. Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1995). Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more invulnerable than the East? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 595-607.
15. Hilgard, E. (1949). Human motives and the concept of the self. American Psychologist, 4, 374-382.
16. Ho, D. Y. F. (1994). Face dynamics: From conceptualization to measurement. In S. Ting-Toomey (Ed.), The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal variations (pp. 267-284). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
17. Ho, D. Y. F. (1995). Selfhood and identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Contrasts with the West. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 25, 115-139.
18. Ho, D. Y. F. (1998). Indigenous psychologies: Asian perspectives. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 88-103.
19. Ho, D. Y. F., Chan, S. F., & Zhang, Z. X. (2001). Metarelational analysis: An answer to "What's Asian about Asian social psychology?" Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 2, 7-26.
20. Ho, D. Y. F., & Chiu, C. Y. (1998). Collective representations as a metaconstruct: An analysis based on methodological relationalism. Culture and Psychology, 4(3), 349-369.
21. Kalish, D. & Montague, R. (1964). Logic: Techniques of formal reasoning. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
22. Kim, U., & Berry, J. W. (Eds.). (1993). Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
24. McAuley, P. C., Bond, M. H., & Kashima, E. (2000). Defining situations objectively: Dimensional analysis of role relationships in Hong Kong and Australia. Manuscript submitted for publication.
25. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
26. Naito, T., & Gielen, U. P. (1992). Tatemae and bonne: A study of moral relativism in Japanese culture. In U. P. Gielen, L. L. Adler, & N. A. Milgram (Eds.), Psychology in international perspective (pp. 161-172). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
27. Paranjpe, A. C. (1998). Self and identity in modern psychology and Indian thought. New York: Plenum Press.
28. Paranjpe, A. C., Ho, D. Y. F., & Rieber, R. W. (Eds.). (1988). Asian contributions to psychology. New York: Praeger.
29. Pe-Pua, R., & Protacio-Marcelino, E. (2000). Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino psychology): A legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 49-71.
30. Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of symbolic logic. New York: The Free Press.
31. Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
32. Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., & Pierce, G. R. (1994). Relationship-specific social support: Toward a model for the analysis of supportive interactions. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 91-112). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
33. Shweder, R. A., & Sullivan, M. A. (1990). The semiotic subject of cultural psychology. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and practice (pp. 399-416). New York: Guilford Press.
34. Sinha, D. (1997). Indigenizing psychology. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 1. Theory and method (2nd ed., pp. 129-169). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
35. Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (1990). Counseling the culturally different: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
36. Yankura, J., & Dryden, W. (1990). Doing RET: Albert Ellis in action. New York: Springer.