Presidential address: Building evaluation's collective capacity

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-12

  Leviton, Laura C ^a  

^a ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035643840     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1098-2140(01)00106-0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Altschuld J.W. The case for a voluntary system for credentialing evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation. 20:(3):1999;507-517.
2. Altschuld J.W. The certification of evaluators Highlights from a report submitted to the Board of Directors of the American Evaluation Association . American Journal of Evaluation. 20:(3):1999;481-493.
3. Berkman L.F., Glass T. Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. Berkman L.F., Kawachi I. Social epidemiology. 1999;137-173 Oxford University Press, New York.
4. Bickman L. AEA Bold or timid? American Journal of Evaluation. 20:(3):1999;519-520.
5. Chelimsky E. What evaluation could do to support foundations A framework with nine component parts . American Journal of Evaluation. 22:(1):2001;13-28.
6. Chen H., Rossi P.H. Using theory to improve program and policy evaluations. 1992;Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
7. Cronbach L.J. Toward reform of program evaluation. 1980;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
8. Dreyfus H.L., Dreyfus S.E. Mind over machine The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer . 1986;Free Press, New York.
9. Fisher R., Ury W., Patton B. Getting to yes Negotiating agreement without giving in . 1991;Penguin, New York.
10. Fraser A. The weaker vessel. 1984;Alfred A. Knopf, Inc, New York.
11. Gardner H. Intelligence reframed Multiple intelligences for the 21st century . 2000;Basic Books, New York.
12. Gubman E.L. The talent solution Aligning strategy and people to achieve extraordinary results . 1998;McGraw-Hill, New York.
13. Jones S.C., Worthen B.R. AEA members' opinions concerning evaluator certification. American Journal of Evaluation. 20:(3):1999;495-505.
14. Leviton L.C., Collins C., Laird B., Kratt P. Teaching evaluation using evaluability assessment. Evaluation. 4:(4):1998;389-409.
15. Lipsey, M. W. (1993). Theory as method: Small theories of treatments. In L. B. Sechrest & A. G. Scott (Eds.), Understanding causes and generalizing about them. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 57 (pp. 5-38). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Newman, D., Scheirer, M. A., Shadish, W., & Wye, C. (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators: A report from the AEA task force on guiding principles for evaluators. In W. R. Shadish, D. L. Newman, M. A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 66 (pp. 99-110). San Francisco: Jossey.
17. Pallak, M. S. (1992). The American Psychological Association, 1970-1985: Growth, conflict and public policy. In R. B. Evans, V. S. Sexton, & T. C. Cadwalleder, (Eds.), The American Psychological Association: A historical perspective (pp. 233-262). Washington, DC: The American Psychological Association.
18. Patton M.Q. Utilization-focused evaluation The new century text . 1997;Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
19. Reichardt C.S. Summative evaluation, formative evaluation, and tactical research. Evaluation Practice. 15:(3):1994;275-281.
20. Ritchie, L. (2000). Social processes of the evaluation community in the United States since 1965. Meridian, MS: Mississippi State University (December 4).
21. Scriven M. Evaluation bias and its control. Glass G.V. Evaluation studies review annual. Vol. 1:1976;101-118 Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
22. Simon H.A. Models of thought. 1979;Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
23. Suchman E.A. Evaluative research Principles and practice in public service and social action programs . 1967;Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
24. Watzlawick P. Pragmatics of human communication A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes . 1967;W. W. Norton, New York.
25. Weiss C.H. Evaluation research Methods for assessing program effectiveness . 1972;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
26. Wholey, J. S. (1987). Evaluability assessment: Developing program theory. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Using program theory in evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 33 (pp. 77-92). San Francisco: Jossey.