What evaluation could do to support foundations: A framework with nine component parts

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 13-28

  Chelimsky, Eleanor ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035624614     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1098-2140(01)00111-4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cassidy, J. (1996, February 19). Fleeing the Fed. The New Yorker, 38-46.
2. Chelimsky E. The coming transformations in evaluation. Chelimsky E., Shadish W.R. Evaluation for the 21st century. 1997;Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
3. Chelimsky E. Program evaluation Patterns and directions . 1985;American Society for Public Administration, Washington, DC.
4. Evans, J. (1977). Cited in E. Chelimsky (Ed.), A symposium on the use of evaluation in federal agencies, Vol. I. Washington, DC: MITRE Corporation.
5. Garvin D. Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review. 71:1993;78-91.
6. Hazzard, S. (1989). Breaking faith. The New Yorker, Part I, September 25, 65(32), 63-99; and Part II, October 2, 65(33), 74-96.
7. Hazzard, S. (1989). Breaking faith. The New Yorker, Part I, September 25, 65(32), 63-99; and Part II, October 2, 65(33), 74-96.
8. Ikle F.C. How nations negotiate. 1964;Harper and Row, New York.
9. Light, P. C. (1999). The tides of nonprofit reform (unpublished draft manuscript). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
10. Maryland Association of Nonprofit Organizations. (1998/1999). Standards for excellence: An ethics and accountability code for the non-profit sector (Unpublished draft manuscript). Cited in P. C. Light (Ed.), The tides of nonprofit reform. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
11. McNelis R.H., Bickel W.E. Building formal knowledge bases Understanding evaluation use in the foundation community . Evaluation Practice. 17:1996;19-41.
12. Patrizi, P., & McMullan, B. (1998). Evaluation in foundations: The unrealized potential (Unpublished manuscript).
13. Plantz M.C., Greenway M.T., Hendricks M. Outcome measurement Showing results in the nonprofit sector . Newcomer K. Using performance measurement to improve public and nonprofit programs. New Directions for Evaluation. 75:1997;15-30 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
14. Porter M.E., Kramer M.R. Philanthropy's new agenda Creating value . Harvard Business Review. 77:1999;121-130.
15. Salamon L.M. Holding the center America's nonprofit sector at a crossroads . 1997;Nathan Cummings Foundation, New York.
16. Scriven, M. (1996). Cited in R. H. McNelis and W. E. Bickel, Building formal knowledge bases: Understanding evaluation use in the foundation community. Evaluation Practice, 17, 19-41.
17. Select Committee on Congressional Operations. (1978). An assessment of General Accounting Office services to the Congress. 95th Congress, 2nd Session. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. Simpson, A. (1990, July 17). GAO's finding of discrimination based on employer sanctions. The Congressional Record, The Senate, pp. S9806-S9809.
19. Tolstoy L. War and peace. 1869/1954;Simon and Schuster, New York.
20. Wilson, J. Q. (1967). Cited in A. Downs, Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.