Validation of the INCOBI Through Comparison of Expert and Novice Computer Users;Validierung des INCOBI anhand eines Vergleichs von Anwendungsexperten und Anwendungsnovizen

Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie

Volumn 15, Issue 3-4, 2001, Pages 219-232

  Naumann, Johannes ^a   Richter, Tobias ^a   Groeben, Norbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attitudes toward the computer; Computer competence; Computer literacy; Validation study

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035629923     PISSN: 10100652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024//1010-0652.15.34.219     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solving. Psychological Review, 94, 192-210.
2. Arbinger, R. & Bannert, M. (1993). Computerwissen von Schülern der Sekundarstufe I. Empirische Pädagogik, 7, 103-124.
3. Ayersman, D. J. & Reed, W. M. (1994). Assessment measures for hypermedia: Development of the IAHK. In J. Willis, B. Robin & D. A. Willis (Eds.), Technology and teacher education annual, 1994 (pp. 412-415). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Bannert, M. & Arbinger, P. R. (1996). Gender-related differences in exposure to and use of computers: Results of a survey of secondary school students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 11, 269-282.
5. Brock, D. B. & Sulsky, L. M. (1994). Attitudes toward computers: Construct validation and relations to computer use. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 17-35.
6. Carver, C. D. & Scheier, M. F. (1989). Expectancies and coping: From test anxiety to pessimism. In R. Schwarzer, H. M. van der Ploeg & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in test anxiety research (Vol. 6, pp. 3-11). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
7. Christmann, U., Groeben, N., Flender, J., Naumann, J. & Richter, T. (1999). Verarbeitungsstrategien von traditionellen (linearen) Buchtexten und zukünftigen (nichtlinearen) Hypertexten. In N. Groeben (Hrsg.), Lesesozialisation in der Mediengesellschaft. Ein Schwerpunkt-programm (10. Sonderheft IASL) (S. 175-189). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
8. Converse, P. (1970). Attitudes and nonattitudes: Continuation of a dialogue. In E. Tufte (Ed.), The quantitative analysis of social problems (pp. 168-189). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
9. Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1994). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Glass, C. R. & Knight, L. A. (1988). Cognitive factors in computer anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 12, 351-366.
11. Haider, G. (1995). Die Computerkompetenz von 14jährigen und ihre schulischen und auβerschulischen Rahmenbedingungen. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation, Universität Salzburg, Österreich.
12. Hacker, W. & Jilge, S. (1993). Vergleich verschiedener Methoden zur Ermittlung von Handlungswissen. Zeitschrift für Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie, 37, 64-72.
13. Hofer, M., Eckert, A., Reimann, R, Döring, N., Horz, H., Schiffhorst, G. & Weber, K. (in Druck). Pädagogisch-Psychologische Begleitung der «Virtuellen Universität Oberrhein» (VIROR, WS 98/99). In D. Leutner & R. Brünken (Hrsg.), Neue Medien in Unterricht, Aus-und Weiterbildung: Aktuelle Ergebnisse empirischer pädagogischer Forschung. Waxmann: Münster.
14. Kay, R. S. (1992). An analysis of methods used to examine gender differences in computer-related behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 272-290.
15. LaLomia, M. J. & Sidowski, J. B. (1991). Measurements of computer attitudes: A review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 171-197.
16. Leutner, D. & Weinsier, P. D. (1994). Attitudes towards computer and information technology at three universities in Germany, Belgium, and the U.S. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 569-591.
17. Levine, T. & Donitsa-Schmidt, S. (1998). Computer use, confidence, attitudes, and knowledge: A causal analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 125-146.
18. Mahar, D., Henderson, R. & Deane, F. (1997). The effects of computer anxiety, state anxiety, and computer experience on users' performance of computer based tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 683-692.
19. Marcoulides, G.A. (1988). The relationship between computer anxiety and computer achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 151-158.
20. Miller, L. A., Stanney, K. M. & Woolen, W. (1997). Development and evaluation of the Windows Computer Experience Questionnaire (WCEQ). International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 9, 201-212.
21. Nickell, G. S. & Pinto, J. N. (1986). The computer attitude scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 2, 301-306.
22. Pratkanis, R. (1989). The cognitive representation of attitudes. In R. Pratkanis, S. Breckler & S. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 70-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Rainer, R. K. & Miller, M. D. (1996). An assessment of the psychometric properties of the computer attitude scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 93-105.
24. Richter, T., Naumann, J. & Groeben, N. (2000). Attitudes toward the computer: Construct validation of an instrument with scales differentiated by content. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 473-491.
25. Richter, T., Naumann, J. & Groeben, N. (2001). Das Inventar zur Computerbildung (INCOBI): Ein Instrument zur Erfassung von Computer Literacy und computerbezogenen Einstellungen bei Studierenden der Geistes-und Sozialwissenschaften. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 48, 1-13.
26. Richter, T., Naumann, J. & Noller, S. (1999). Computer Literacy und computerbezogene Einstellungen: Zur Vergleichbarkeit von Online-und Paper-Pencil-Erhebungen. In U.-D. Reips, B. Batinic, W. Bandilla, M. Bosnjak, L. Gräf, K. Moser & A. Werner (Eds./Hrsg.), Current internet science - trends, techniques, results/ Aktuelle Online-Forschung - Trends, Techniken, Ergebnisse. Zürich: Online Press [WWW document]. Verfügbar unter: http://dgof.de/tband99/.
27. Rozell, E. J. & Gardner, W. L. (2000). Cognitive, motivation and affective processes associated with computer-related performance: A path analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 199-222.
28. Schwan, S. & Hesse, F. W. (1998). Lernen mit neuen Medien - vom Medienverbund zum Verbundmedium. In H. Kubicek, H. J. Braczyk, D. Klumpp, G. Müller, W. Neu, R. Eckart & A. Rossnagel (Hrsg.), Lernort Multimedia (S. 45-54). Heidelberg: Von Deckers.
29. Tourangeau, R. (1992). Context effects on responses to attitude questions: Attitudes as memory structures. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Context effects in social and psychological research (pp. 35-48). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
30. Weidenmann, B. & Krapp, A. (1989). Lernen mit dem Computer, Lernen für den Computer. Einleitung der Herausgeber zum Themenheft. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 35, 621-636.
31. Whitley, B. E. (1996). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes: It depends on what you ask. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 275-289.
32. Whitley, B. E. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1-22.
33. Wilson, T.D., Dunn, D.S., Kraft, D. & Lisle, D.L. (1989). Introspection, attitude change, and attitude-behavior consistency: The disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, (pp. 287-343). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34. Wine, J. D. (1980). Cognitive-attentional theory of test anxiety. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.), Test anxiety: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 349-385). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.