Peer appraisals: Differentiation of individual performance on group tasks

Human Resource Management

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 333-345

  Drexler, John A ^a   Beehr, Terry A ^b   Stetz, Thomas A ^c  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA)   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035624705     PISSN: 00904848     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.1023     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
2. Becker, E., & Huselid, M. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 16, 53-101.
3. Bettenhausen, K.L., & Fedor, D.B. (1997). Peer and upward appraisals: A comparison of their benefits and problems. Group and Organization Management, 22 (2), 236-263.
4. Brockbank, W. (1999). If HR were really strategically proactive: Present and future directions in HR's contribution to competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 38, 337-352.
5. Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C.L. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 317-372). Chichester, England: Wiley.
6. Day, D.V., & Sulsky, L.M. (1995). Effects of frame-of-reference training and information configuration on memory organization and rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 158-167.
7. DeNisi, A.S., Randolph, W.A., & Blencoe, A.G. (1983). Potential problems with peer ratings. Academy of Management Journal, 26(3), 457-464.
8. Dunnette, M.D. (1993). My hammer or your hammer? Human Resource Management, 32 (2 & 3), 373-384.
9. Fox, S., Caspy, T., & Reisler, A. (1994). Variables affecting leniency, halo, and validity of self-appraisal. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 45-56.
10. Furnham, A., & Stringfield, P. (1998). Congruence in job-performance ratings: A study of 360-degree feedback examining self, manager, peers, and consultant ratings. Human Relations, 51, 517-530.
11. Guzzo, R.A., & Shea, G.P. (1992). Group performance and inter group relations in organizations. In M.D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Volume 3, pp. 269-313). Palo Alto CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
12. Hackman, J.R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J.W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 215-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Harris, M.M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A metaanalysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41, 43-62.
14. Imada, A.S. (1982). Social interaction, observation, and stereotypes as determinants of differentiation in peer ratings. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 397-415.
15. Kabanoff, B. (1991). Equity, equality, power, and conflict. Academy of Management Review, 16, 416-441.
16. Kane, J.S., & Lawler, E.E., III (1978). Methods of peer assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 85(3), 555-586.
17. Katzenbach, J.R., & Smith, D.K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
18. Kerr, S. (1995). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Executive, 9(1), 7-14.
19. London, M., & Smither, J.W. (1995). Can multisource feedback change perceptions of goal accomplishment, self-evaluations, and performance-related outcomes? Theory-based applications and directions for research. Personnel Psychology, 48, 803-839.
20. Longenecker, C.O., Sims, H.P., Jr., & Gioia, D.A. (1987). Behind the mask: The politics of employee appraisal. Academy of Management Executive, 1(3), 183-193.
21. Love, K.G. (1981). Comparison of peer assessment methods: Reliability, validity, friendship bias, and user reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(4), 451-457.
22. McEvoy, G.M., & Buller, P.F. (1987). User acceptance of peer appraisals in an industrial setting. Personnel Psychology, 40(4), 785-797.
23. Meyer, H.H., Kay, E., & French, J.R.P., Jr. (1965). Split roles in performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review, 43(January-February), 123-129.
24. Mohrman, A.M., Jr., Resnick-West, S.M., & Lawler, E.E., III (1989) Designing performance appraisal systems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Moorman, R.H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors. Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology 76, 845-855.
26. Morahan-Martin, J. (1996). Should peers' evaluations be used in class projects? Questions regarding reliability, leniency, and acceptance. Psychological Reports, 78, 1243-1250.
27. Nadler, D.A. (1977). Feedback and organization development: Using data-based methods. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28. Norman, C.A., & Zawacki, R.A. (1991). Team appraisals-Team approach. Personnel Journal, 70(9), 101-104.
29. Price, J.L., & Mueller, C.W. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
30. Saavedra, R., & Kwun, S.K. (1993). Peer evaluations in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(3), 450-462.
31. Shapiro, D.L., & Brett, J.M. (1993). Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice: A field study of mediation and arbitration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1167-1177.
32. Smither, J.W., Reilly, R.R., Millsap, R.R., & Stoffey, R.W. (1993). Applicant reactions to selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 46, 49-76.
33. Sovereign, K.L. (1999). Personnel Law (4th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34. Tannenbaum, S.I., Beard, R.L., & Salas, E. (1992). Team building and its influences on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. In K. Kelly (Ed.), Issues theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
35. Tenbrunsel, A.E. (1998). Misrepresentation and expectations of misrepresentation in an ethical dilemma: The role of incentives and temptation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 330-339.
36. Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
37. Tornow, W.W. (1993). Perceptions or reality: Is multiperspective measurement a means or an end? Human Resource Management, 32(2 & 3), 221-229.
38. Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E., & Antonioni, D. (1998). Has 360-degree feedback gone amok? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 86-94.
39. Waldman, D.A., & Bowen, D.E. (1998). The acceptability of 360-degree appraisals: A customer-supplier relationship perspective. Human Resource Management, 37, 117-129.
40. Watson, W., Michaelsen, L.K., & Sharp, W. (1991). Member competence, group interaction, and group decision making: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 803-809.