Hypotheses on populism: The politics of charismatic protest

East European Politics and Societies

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 10-17

  Tismaneanu, Vladimir ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035598934     PISSN: 08883254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/088832501766276506     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. See Donald G. McNeil Jr., "Hungary's Millennium Fireworks: A Royal Puzzle," New York Times, 3 January 2000, A3.
2. For a thought-provoking discussion of the uneasy coexistence of neopopulism and neoliberalism, see Kurt Weyland, "Neoliberal Populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe," Comparative Politics 31:4 (July 1999): 379-401.
3. See Andrew Janos, "Continuity and Change in Eastern Europe: Strategies of Post-Communist Politics," East European Politics and Societies 8:1 (Winter 1994): 1-31.
4. See Vladimir Tismaneanu, "Understanding National Stalinism: Reflections on Ceausescu's Socialism," Communist and Post-Communist Studies 32:2 (June 1999): 155-75.
5. e siècle (Paris: Fayard, 2001).
6. e siècle (Paris: Fayard, 2001).
7. e siècle (Paris: Fayard, 2001).
8. e siècle (Paris: Fayard, 2001).
9. See for instance Daniel Chirot, "Modernity Without Liberalism: The Ideological Roots of Modern Tyranny," Contention 5:1 (Fall 1995): 141-82;
10. Ken Jowitt, The New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992); Roger Griffin, "Afterword: Last Rights?" in Sabrina P. Ramet, ed., The Radical Right in Central and Eastern Europe since 1989 (University Park: Penn State University Press, 1999), 297-321.
11. Ken Jowitt, The New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992); Roger Griffin, "Afterword: Last Rights?" in Sabrina P. Ramet, ed., The Radical Right in Central and Eastern Europe since 1989 (University Park: Penn State University Press, 1999), 297-321.
12. See G. M. Tamás, "Ethnarchy and Ethno-Anarchism," Social Research 63:1 (Spring 1996): 147-90; also by the same author, the provocative essay "On Post-Fascism," Boston Review 25:3 (Summer 2000): 42-46.
13. See G. M. Tamás, "Ethnarchy and Ethno-Anarchism," Social Research 63:1 (Spring 1996): 147-90; also by the same author, the provocative essay "On Post-Fascism," Boston Review 25:3 (Summer 2000): 42-46.
14. See Karen Dawisha, "Electocracies and the Hobbesian Fishbowl of Postcommunist Politics," East European Politics and Societies 13:2 (Spring 1999): 256-270.
15. See Gino Germani, Authoritarianism, Fascism, and National Populism (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction, 1978); András Bozoki and Miklós Sukosd, "Civil Society and Populism in Eastern European Democratic Transitions," Praxis International 13 (October 1993): 224-41 ; Vladimir Tismaneanu, "The Leninist Debris or Waiting for Peron," East European Politics and Societies 10:3 (Fall 1996): 504-35 (with a rejoinder by Daniel Chirot).
16. See Gino Germani, Authoritarianism, Fascism, and National Populism (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction, 1978); András Bozoki and Miklós Sukosd, "Civil Society and Populism in Eastern European Democratic Transitions," Praxis International 13 (October 1993): 224-41 ; Vladimir Tismaneanu, "The Leninist Debris or Waiting for Peron," East European Politics and Societies 10:3 (Fall 1996): 504-35 (with a rejoinder by Daniel Chirot).
17. See Gino Germani, Authoritarianism, Fascism, and National Populism (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction, 1978); András Bozoki and Miklós Sukosd, "Civil Society and Populism in Eastern European Democratic Transitions," Praxis International 13 (October 1993): 224-41 ; Vladimir Tismaneanu, "The Leninist Debris or Waiting for Peron," East European Politics and Societies 10:3 (Fall 1996): 504-35 (with a rejoinder by Daniel Chirot).
18. See " The Effects of Totalitarianism-cum-Sultanism on Democratic Transition: Romania," in Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996), 344-65; Andzej Walicki, "The Troubled Legacy of Roman Dmowski," East European Politics and Societies 14:1 (Winter 2000): 12-46.
19. See " The Effects of Totalitarianism-cum-Sultanism on Democratic Transition: Romania," in Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996), 344-65; Andzej Walicki, "The Troubled Legacy of Roman Dmowski," East European Politics and Societies 14:1 (Winter 2000): 12-46.
20. See Irena Grudzińska Gross, "Post-Communist Resentment, or the Rewriting of Polish History," East European Politics and Societies 6:2 (Spring 1992): 141-51.
21. In his response to Francis Fukuyama's controversial article "The End of History?" Alan Bloom disturbingly wrote: " . . . liberalism has won but may be decisively unsatisfactory . . . And, although fascism was defeated on the battlefield, its dark possibilities were not seen through the end. If an alternative is sought there is nowhere else to seek it. I suggest that fascism has a future, if not the future" (See National Interest, Summer 1989, 21) . Similarly, Pierre Hassner asked: "Is it really impossible that the search for action in a prosaic society, or the search for scapegoats in a bewildered one confronted with sudden social or natural catastrophe, should produce not the rebirth of systematic ideological doctrines but a primitive form of fascism based on resentment, fear, hatred, and hysteria?" (idem, p. 23).
22. In his response to Francis Fukuyama's controversial article "The End of History?" Alan Bloom disturbingly wrote: " . . . liberalism has won but may be decisively unsatisfactory . . . And, although fascism was defeated on the battlefield, its dark possibilities were not seen through the end. If an alternative is sought there is nowhere else to seek it. I suggest that fascism has a future, if not the future" (See National Interest, Summer 1989, 21) . Similarly, Pierre Hassner asked: "Is it really impossible that the search for action in a prosaic society, or the search for scapegoats in a bewildered one confronted with sudden social or natural catastrophe, should produce not the rebirth of systematic ideological doctrines but a primitive form of fascism based on resentment, fear, hatred, and hysteria?" (idem, p. 23).
23. For a sobering interpretation of the twentieth century European civil war and the problematic nature of liberalism's presumed ultimate triumph, see Mark Mazower, Dark Continent: Europe's Twentieth Century (New York: Knopf, 1999).