Is the exhibition season becoming more important to forecasting presidential nominations?

American Politics Research

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 283-288

  Adkins, Randall E ^a   Dowdle, Andrew J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^b FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035594286     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X01293005     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Adkins, R. E. (2000, April). Progressive ambition and the presidency. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
2. Adkins, R. E., & Dowdle, A. J. (2000). Break out the mint juleps? Is New Hampshire the "primary" culprit limiting presidential nomination forecasting? American Politics Quarterly, 28, 251-269.
3. Adkins, R. E., & Dowdle, A. J. (in press). How important are Iowa and New Hampshire to winning post-reform presidential nominations? Political Research Quarterly.
4. Barilleaux, R. J., & Adkins, R. E. (1993). The nomination: Process and patterns. In M. Nelson (Ed.), The elections of 1992 (pp. 21-56). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
5. Mayer, W. (1996). Forecasting presidential nominations. In W. Mayer (Ed.), In pursuit of the White House: How we choose our presidential nominees (pp. 44-71). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
6. Steger, W.P. (2000). Do primary voters draw from a stacked deck? Presidential nominations in an era of candidate-centered campaigns. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 30, 727-753.