Community standards for defining attempt: Inconsistencies with the Model Penal Code

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 405-420

  Darley, John M ^a   Sanderson, Catherine A ^b   LaMantia, Peter S ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030539868     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764296039004005     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Carroll, J. S., Perkowitz, W. T., Lurigio, A. J., & Weaver, F. M. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, ideology, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 107-118.
2. Fitzgerald, R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1984). Due process vs. crime control: Death qualification and jury attitudes. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 31-52.
3. Fletcher, G. P. (1978). Rethinking criminal law. New York: Little, Brown.
4. Hagan, J. (1975). Law order and sentencing: A study of attitudes in action. Sociometry, 38, 374-384.
5. Mitchell, H. E., & Byrne, D. (1973). The defendant's dilemma: Effects of juror's attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 123-129.
6. Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. (1995). Justice, liability, and blame: Community views and the criminal law. Boulder, CO: Westview.
7. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.