Retail politics: Local sales taxes and the fiscalization of land use

Economic Development Quarterly

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 21-35

  Lewis, Paul G ^a  

^a PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035587793     PISSN: 08912424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089124240101500102     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. (1989). Local revenue diversification: Local sales taxes. Washington, DC: Author.
2. California State Controller, (annual). Financial transactions concerning cities of California. Sacramento: Author.
3. Chapman, J. I. (1998). Proposition 13: Some unintended consequences (Occasional paper). San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
4. Dardia, M. (1998). Subsidizing redevelopment in California. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
5. Davies, R. L. (1976). Marketing geography. Corbridge, UK: Retailing and Planning Associates.
6. Fischel, W. (1989). Did Serrano cause Proposition 13? National Tax Journal, 42, 465-473.
7. Fisher, G. W. (1996). The worst tax? A history of the property tax in America. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
8. Fleischmann, A. (1986). The goals and strategies of local boundary changes: Government organization or private gain? Journal of Urban Affairs, 8, 63-76.
9. Fleischmann, A. (1989, July/August). Politics, administration, and local land-use regulation: Analyzing zoning as a policy process. Public Administration Review, pp. 337-344.
10. Fleischmann, A., & Pierranunzi, C. (1990). Citizens, development interests, and local land-use regulation. Journal of Politics, 52, 838-853.
11. Fulton, W. (1997). The reluctant metropolis: The politics of urban growth in Los Angeles. Point Arena, CA: Solano.
12. Fulton, W. (1998). Twenty years of Proposition 13. California Planning and Development Report, 13(6), 1, 8-10.
13. Guy, C. (1994). The retail development process: Location, property, and planning. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
14. Hill, E. W., Brennan, J. F, & Wolman, H. L. (1998). What is a central city in the United States? Applying a statistical technique for developing taxonomies. Urban Studies, 35, 1935-1969.
15. International Council of Shopping Centers. (1996). NRB/Shopping Centers Today 1995 shopping center census. New York: Author.
16. Kotin, A., & Peiser, R. (1997). Public-private joint ventures for high volume retailers: Who benefits? Urban Studies, 34, 1971-1986.
17. Krmenec, A. J. (1991). Sales tax as property tax relief? The shifting onus of local revenue generation. Professional Geographer, 43, 60-67.
18. Kroll, C., & Marrinan, E. (1985). California retail sales: Growth patterns and locational tendencies (Working paper 85-95). Berkeley: University of California, Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics.
19. League of California Cities. (1996). Conflicts at the city's edge: Annexations, development, and tax negotiations. San Luis Obispo, CA: Crawford Multari & Starr.
20. Mills, E. S. (1999, March). Should governments try to control suburban growth? Chicago Fed Letter, pp. 1-4.
21. Misczynski, D. J. (1986). The fiscalization of land use. In J. J. Kirlin & D. R. Winkler (Eds.), California policy choices (Vol. 3, pp. 73-105). Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
22. Orfield, M. (1997). Metropolitics: A new agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
23. Peterson, P. E. (1981). City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Salant, P., & Dillman, D. A. (1994). How to conduct your own survey. New York: John Wiley.
25. Schneider, M. (1986). The market for local economic development: The growth of suburban retail trade, 1972-1982. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22, 24-41.
26. Schrag, P. (1998). Paradise lost: California's experience, America's future. New York: New Press.
27. Schwartz, J. (1997). Prisoners of Proposition 13: Sales taxes, property taxes, and the fiscalization of municipal land use decisions. Southern California Law Review, 71, 183-217.
28. Sokolow, A. D. (1998). The changing property tax and state-local relations. Publius, 28, 165-187.
29. State of California, Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit. (2000). Population estimates for California cities and counties [On line]. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.dof.ca.gov/html/Demograp/repndat.htm
30. Sudman, S. (1985). Mail surveys of reluctant professionals. Evaluation Review, 9, 349-360.
31. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1975). Census of Governments, 1972: Finance summary statistics. Washington, DC: Author.
32. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1979). Census of Governments, 1977: Finance summary statistics. Washington, DC: Author.
33. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1985). Census of Governments, 1982: Finance summary statistics. Washington, DC: Author.
34. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1990). Census of Governments, 1987: Finance summary statistics. Washington, DC: Author.
35. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1994). Census of Governments, 1992: Finance summary statistics. Washington, DC: Author.