The effects of response topography on functional equivalence class formation

Psychological Record

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 89-110

  Bones, Robert ^a   Keenan, Michael ^a   Askin, Darren ^b   Adams, Louise ^b   Taylor, David ^b   Nicholas, Orla ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035582555     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395388     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. BARNES, D., BROWNE, M., SMEETS, P., & ROCHE, B. (1995). A transfer of functions and conditional transfer of functions through equivalence relations in three-to six-year-old children. The Psychological Record, 45, 405-430.
2. BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and non-arbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61-81.
3. BUSH, K. M., SIDMAN, M., & DE ROSE, T. (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 567-584.
4. COOPER, J. O., HERON, T. E., & HEWARD, W. L. (1987). Applied behavior analysis. Merrill Publishing.
5. DOUGHER, M. J., AUGUSTON, E. M., MARKHAM, M. R., WULFERT, E., & GREENWAY, D. E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 331-351.
6. FIELDS, L., LANDON-JIMENEZ, D. V., BUFFINGTON, D. M., & ADAMS, B. J. (1995). Maintained nodal-distance effects in equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 129-145.
7. HAYES, S. C. (Ed.). (1989). Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum.
8. HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & S. C Hayes (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19-40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
9. HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp.191-220). New York: Plenum.
10. HAYES, S. C., KOHLENBERG, B. S., & HAYES, L. J. (1991). The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 119-137.
11. KOHLENBERG, B. S., HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1991). The transfer of contextual control over equivalence classes through equivalence classes: A possible model of social stereotyping. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 505-518.
12. LAZAR, R. M., & KOTLARCHYK, B. J. (1986). Second order control of sequence-class equivalences in children. Behavioral Processes, 13, 205-215.
13. LEADER, G., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent type procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685-706
14. MCGLINCHEY, A., & KEENAN, M. (1997). Stimulus equivalence and social categorization in Northern Ireland. Behavior and Social Issues, Volume 7, Number 2, 113-128.
15. MOXON, P., KEENAN, M., & HINE, L. (1993). Gender-role stereotyping and stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 381-394
16. PILGRIM, C., CHAMBERS, L., & GALIZIO, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: 2. Children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 239-254.
17. PILGRIM, C., & GALIZIO, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: Adults. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 225-238.
18. SAUNDERS, R. R., WACHTER, J., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 95-115.
19. SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiller (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In H. Lejeune & D. Blackman (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
22. SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
23. SIDMAN, M., WYNNE, C. K., MAGUIRE, R. W., & BARNES, T. (1989). Functional classes and equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 261-274.
24. SMEETS, P. M., BARNES, D., & ROCHE, B. (1997). Functional rquivalence in children: Derived stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus relations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66(1), 1-17.
25. SPENCER, T. J., & CHASE, P. N. (1996). Speed analysis of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 643-659.
26. SPRADLIN, J., & SAUNDERS, R. R. (1984). Behaving appropriately in new situations: A stimulus class analysis. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 574-579.
27. WATT, A., KEENAN, M., BARNES, D., & CAIRNS, E. (1991). Social categorization and stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 41, 33-50.
28. WULFERT, E., & HAYES, S. C. (1989). Transfer of conditioned ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 489-504.