Electromagnetomotive force fields in noninertial reference frames and accelerated superconducting quantum interferometers

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 64, Issue 21, 2001, Pages

  Fischer, Uwe R ^a   Häussler, Christoph ^a   Oppenländer, Jörg ^a   Schopohl, Nils ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; DYNAMICS; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FORCE; INTERFEROMETER; MAGNETISM; OSCILLATION;

EID: 0035576794     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.214509     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. J. C. Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism (Dover, New York, 1954) (originally published 1891).
2. S. J. Barnett, Phys. Rev. 6, 239 (1915).
3. R. C. Tolman and T. D. Stewart, Phys. Rev. 8, 97 (1916).
4. R. C. Tolman and T. D. Stewart, Phys. Rev. 9, 164 (1917).
5. G. F. Moorhead and G. I. Opat, Class. Quantum Grav. 13, 3129 (1996).
6. An overview of the existing literature (up to the year 1992) may be found in T. W. Darling, F. Rossi, G. I. Opat, and G. F. Moorhead, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 237 (1992).
7. F. London, Superfluids, Volume 1: Macroscopic Theory of Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (Dover, New York, 1961).
8. J. E. Zimmerman and J. E. Mercereau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 887 (1965).
9. M. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3223 (1998).
10. J. Tate, S. B. Felch, and B. Cabrera, Phys. Rev. B 42, 7885 (1990).
11. A. A. Verheijen, J. M. van Ruitenbeek, R. de Bruyn Ouboter, and L. J. de Jongh, Nature (London) 345, 418 (1990).
12. M. A. Sanzari, H. L. Cui, and F. Karwacki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 3802 (1996).
13. R. B. Laughlin and D. Pines, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 28 (2000).
14. A. Hartland et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 969 (1991).
15. A. K. Jain, J. E. Lukens, and J.-S. Tsai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1165 (1987).
16. U. R. Fischer and N. Schopohl, Europhys. Lett. 54, 502 (2001).
17. J. Oppenländer, Ch. Häussler, and N. Schopohl, Phys. Rev. B 63, 024511 (2001).
18. J. Oppenländer, T. Träuble, Ch. Häussler, and N. Schopohl, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 11, 1271 (2001)
19. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.Ch. Häussler, T. Träuble, J. Oppenländer, and N. Schopohl, 11, 1275 (2001).
20. Ch. Häussler, J. Oppenländer, and N. Schopohl, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 1875 (2001).
21. We omit a factor of (Formula presented) in the definition of the vector potential which can be introduced for (weak) gravity as a tensorial, spin-2 theory, cf., e.g., B. Mashhoon, “Gravitoelectromagnetism,” gr-qc/0011014, in Reference Frames and Gravitomagnetism, edited by J.-F. Pascual-Sánchez, L. Floría, A. San Miguel, and F. Vicente (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), pp. 121–132, and references cited therein, as well as the Appendix of the present paper.
22. E. J. Post, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 475 (1967).
23. G. E. Stedman, Rep. Prog. Phys. 60, 615 (1997).
24. K. K. Likharev: Dynamics of Josephson Junctions and Circuits, 2nd ed. (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1991).
25. J. C. Satterthwaite and E. T. Gawlinski, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 5829 (1997).
26. O. Avenel and E. Varoquaux, Czech. J. Phys. 46 (Suppl. S6), 3319 (1996)
27. K. Schwab, N. Bruckner, and R. E. Packard, Nature (London) 386, 585 (1997)
28. Y. Mukharsky, O. Avenel, and É. Varoquaux, Physica B 284-288, 287 (2000)
29. R. W. Simmonds, A. Marchenkov, E. Hoskinson, J. C. Davis, and R. E. Packard, Nature (London) 412, 55 (2001).
30. S. Vitale, M. Bonaldi, P. Falferi, G. A. Prodi, and M. Cerdonio, Phys. Rev. B 39, 11 993 (1989).
31. This dependence lifts the degeneracy of the Landau energy levels related to (Formula presented).
32. S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology (Wiley, New York, 1972), Sec. 9.1.