Concerning superconducting inertial guidance gyroscopes inside superconducting magnetic shields

Journal of Applied Physics

Volumn 82, Issue 11, 1997, Pages 5829-5836

  Satterthwaite, James C ^a,b   Gawlinski, Edward T ^a  

^a Temple University   (United States)

^b TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS; CURRENT DENSITY; ELECTRONS; HIGH TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTORS; JOSEPHSON JUNCTION DEVICES; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC SHIELDING; SQUIDS;

AMPERE LAW; GINZBURG-LANDAU THEORY; LONDON THEORY; SUPERCONDUCTING GYROSCOPE; SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETIC SHIELD; SUPERCURRENT DENSITY;

GYROSCOPES;

EID: 0031386954     PISSN: 00218979     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.366451     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. A. Lawrence, Moderm Inertial Technology: Navigation, Guidance, and Control (Springer, New York, 1993), Chaps. 11-14.
2. G. Sagnac, C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 157, 708 (1913).
3. E. J. Post, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 475 (1967).
4. A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon, J. Math. Phys. 16, 341 (1975).
5. R. Anderson, H. R. Bilger, and G. E. Stedman, Am. J. Phys. 62, 975 (1994).
6. A. Lenef, T. D. Hammond, E. T. Smith, M. S. Chapman, R. A. Rubenstein, and D. E. Pritchard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 760 (1997).
7. J. F. Clauser, Physica B 151, 262 (1988).
8. K. Schwab, N. Bruckner, and R. E. Packard, Nature (London) 386, 585 (1997).
9. Phys. Today 50 (6), 9 (1997).
10. R. E. Packard and S. Vitale, Phys. Rev. B 46, 3540 (1992).
11. F. Hasselbach and M. Nicklaus, Phys. Rev. A 48, 143 (1993).
12. L. A. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 543 (1975).
13. S. A. Werner, J.-L. Staudenmann, and R. Colella, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1103 (1979).
14. J.-L. Staudenmann, S. A. Werner, R. Colella, and A. W. Overhauser, Phys. Rev. A 21, 1419 (1980).
15. D. K. Atwood, M. A. Horne, C. G. Shull, and J. Arthur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1673 (1984).
16. J. E. Zimmerman and J. E. Mercereau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 887 (1965).
17. J. E. Zimmerman and A. H. Silver, Phys. Lett. 10, 47 (1964).
18. R. Becker, G. Heller, and F. Sauter, Z. Phys. 85, 772 (1933).
19. F. London, Superfluids, Vol. 1, Macroscopic Theory of Superconductivity, 2nd rev. ed. (Dover, New York, 1961), pp. 78-83.
20. A. F. Hildebrandt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 190 (1964).
21. A. F. Hildebrandt, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 9, 454 (1964).
22. A. F. Hildebrandt and M. M. Saffren, Low Temperature Physics LT9: Proceedings of the IXth International Conference on Low Temperature Physics, Columbus, Ohio, 1964, edited by J. G. Daunt, D. O. Edwards, F. J. Milford, and M. Yaqub (Plenum, New York, 1965), pp. 459-65.
23. C. A. King, Jr., J. B. Hendricks, and H. E. Rorschach, Jr., in Ref. 22, pp. 466-470.
24. M. Bol and W. M. Fairbank, in Ref. 22, pp. 471-474.
25. N. F. Brickman, Phys. Rev. 184, 460 (1969).
26. K. Oide and H. Hirakawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 43, 1087 (1977).
27. A. A. Verheijen, J. M. van Ruitenbeek, R. de Bruyn Ouboter, and L. J. de Jongh, Nature (London) 345, 418 (1990).
28. A. A. Verheijen, J. M. van Ruitenbeek, R. de Bruyn Ouboter, and L. J. de Jongh, Physica B 165&166, 1181 (1990).
29. Y. M. Xiao, W. Felson, C. H. Wu, G. M. Keiser, and J. P. Turneaure, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 3, 2144 (1993).
30. BoI and Fairbank (see Ref. 24) detected the magnetic field inside a rotating superconducting cylinder by means of an external measurement of its magnetic moment. They appropriately called the effect they observed the London moment, but there is no justification for the common practice of referring to the internal field itself as the London moment.
31. G. Papini, Phys. Lett. A 24, 32 (1967).
32. J. G. Bednorz and K. A. Muller, Z. Phys. B 64, 189 (1986).
33. F. A. Karwacki, I. Perez, and J. E. Crow, Theory: Superconducting Josephson Junction Gyroscope (unpublished typescript, 1990).
34. P. Lorrain, D. R. Corson, and F. Lorrain, Electromagnetic Fields and Waves, 3rd ed. (Freeman, New York, 1988), p. 406.
35. I. Sasada, T. Yamamoto, and T. Yamauchi, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 5490 (1996).
36. A. Koski and S. L. Wipf, IEEE Trans. Magn. 32, 2663 (1996).
37. H. S. M, ter Brake, R. Huonker, and H. Rogalla, Meas. Sci. Technol. 4, 1370 (1993).
38. K. H. Carpenter, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 6, 142 (1996).
39. B. Cabrera, Stanford University Physics Department Low Temperature Group preprint No. BC121-93 (1993).
40. S. Vitale, M. Bonaldi, P. Falferi, G. A. Prodi, and M. Cerdonio, Phys. Rev. B 39, 11 993 (1989).
41. R. M. Brady, J. Low Temp. Phys. 49, 1 (1982).
42. S. H. Payne and G. E. Stedman, Phys. Lett. A 50, 415 (1975).
43. J. C. Satterthwaite, Ph.D. dissertation, Temple University, 1996.
44. V. L. Ginzburg and L. D. Landau, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 1064 (1950), translated by D. ter Haar in Men of Physics: L. D. Landau, Vol. 1, Low Temperature and Solid State Physics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1965), pp. 138-167.
45. V. L. Ginzburg and L. D. Landau, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 1064 (1950), translated by D. ter Haar in Men of Physics: L. D. Landau, Vol. 1, Low Temperature and Solid State Physics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1965), pp. 138-167.
46. F. London and H. London, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 149, 71 (1935).
47. F. London and H. London, Physica (Utrecht) 2, 341 (1935).
48. F. London, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 152, 24 (1935).
49. F. London, Superfluids, Vol. 1 (cf. Ref. 19).
50. Equation (1.2) is derived from the Ginzburg-Landau theory by minimizing the Ginzburg-Landau free energy with respect to A and recognizing the resulting equation as Ampère's law, with the right-hand side of equation (1.2) playing the role of the current density. The same equation is derived from the London theory by identifying ℏ θ with London's superpotential [London 1961 (see Ref. 19), 70-73, 150]. The Ginzburg-Landau theory reduces to the London theory in cases where the condensate density n * is spatially uniform.
51. Note that the last term on the right-hand side of equation (1.5) comes from the motion of the ions and from the assumption of charge neutrality, not from a coordinate transformation. The argument of this article is carried out entirely in an inertial frame of reference.
52. M. M. Saffren, The Rotating Superconductor, Parts I-III, Technical Report No. 32-650 (Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, 1965).
53. B. Cabrera, H. Gutfreund, and W. A. Little, Phys. Rev. B 25, 6644 (1982).
54. -2Ã′.
55. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1975), pp. 42-43.
56. F. London, Superfluids, Vol. 1, 74-75 (see Ref. 19).
57. C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 6th ed. (Wiley, New York, 1986), p. 334.
58. T. P. Orlando and K. A. Delin, Foundations of Applied Superconductivity (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1991), pp. 257-58.
59. F. London, Superfluids, Vol. 1, pp. 73-78 (see Ref. 19).
60. 2/2, where I is the moment of inertia of the lattice. There is no need to include this constant term in the equations that follow.
61. See, for example, L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 1, Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Pergamon, Oxford, 1976), pp. 127-129.
62. The current of the lattice ions was fixed when we fixed ω.