Computerized adaptive testing with equated number-correct scoring

Applied Psychological Measurement

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 343-355

  Van Der Linden, Wim J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035539812     PISSN: 01466216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/01466210122032208     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Chang, H., & Ying, Z. (in press). Nonlinear sequential designs for logistic item response theory models with applications to computerized adaptive tests. Annals of Statistics.
2. Chen, W.-H., & Thissen, D. (1999). Estimation of item parameters for the three-parameter logistic model using the marginal likelihood of summed scores. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52, 19-37.
3. ILOG (1998). CPLEX 6.0 user's manual. Incline Village NV: Author.
4. Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (1995). Test equating: Methods and practices. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Lawrence, I., & Feigenbaum, M. (1997). Linking scores for computer-adaptive and paper-and-pencil administrations of the SAT (Research Report No. 97-12). Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.
6. Lehmann, E. L. (1999). Elements of large-sample theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
7. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
9. Lord, F. M., & Wingersky, M. S. (1984). Comparison of IRT true-score and equipercentile observed-score "equatings." Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 452-461.
10. Segall, D. O. (1997). Equating the CAT-ASVAB. In W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, & J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 181-198). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
11. Stocking, M. L. (1996). An alternative method for scoring adaptive tests. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 365-389.
12. Timminga, E., van der Linden, W. J., & Schweizer, D. A. (1996). ConTEST 2.0: A decision support system for item banking and optimal test assembly [Computer program and manual]. Groningen, The Netherlands: ProGAMMA.
13. van der Linden, W. J. (1998a). Optimal assembly of psychological and educational tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 195-211.
14. van der Linden, W. J. (1998b). Bayesian item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 63, 201-216.
15. van der Linden, W. J. (1999). A procedure for empirical initialization of the trait estimator in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 21-29.
16. van der Linden, W. J. (2000a). Constrained adaptive testing with shadow tests. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 27-52). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
17. van der Linden, W. J. (2000b). A test-theoretic approach to observed-score equating. Psychometrika, 65, 437-456.
18. van der Linden, W. J., & Luecht, R. M. (1998). Observed-score equating as a test assembly problem. Psychometrika, 62, 401-418.
19. van der Linden, W. J., & Reese, L. M. (1998). A model for optimal constrained adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 259-270.
20. van der Linden, W. J., Scrams, D. J., & Schnipke, D. L. (1999). Using response-time constraints to control for speededness in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 195-210.
21. Veldkamp, B. P. (2001). Principles and methods of constrained test assembly (Chapter 4). Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
22. Yen, W. M. (1984). Obtaining maximum-likelihood estimates from number-correct scores for the three-parameter logistic model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 93-111.