Time-series - cross-section data

Statistica Neerlandica

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 111-133

  Beck, Nathaniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Binary dependent variable; Dynamics; Heterogeneity; Panel data; Random coefficients; Robust standard errors; Spatial models

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035536563     PISSN: 00390402     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9574.00161     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. ALVAREZ, R. M., G. GARRETT and P. LANGE (1991), Government partisanship, labor organization and macroeconomic performace, American Political Science Review 85, 539-56.
2. ANSELIN, L. (1998), Spatial econometrics: methods and models, Kluwer Academic, Boston.
3. BECK, N. and J. N. KATZ (1995), What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data, American Political Science Review 89, 634-47.
4. BECK, N. and J. N. KATZ (1996a), Lumpers and splitters united: the random coefficients model, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Ann Arbor, July.
5. BECK, N. and J. N. KATZ (1996b), Nuisance vs. substance: specifying and estimating time-series-cross-section models, Political Analysis 6, 1-36.
6. BECK, N. and J. N. KATZ (1997), The analysis of binary time-series-cross-section data and/or the democratic peace, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Group, Columbus, OH.
7. BECK, N. and J. N. KATZ (2001), Throwing out the baby with the bath water: a comment on Green, Kim and Yoon, International Organizations 55, 487-495.
8. BECK, N., J. N. KATZ and R. TUCKER (1998), Taking time seriously: time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable, American Journal of Political Science 42, 1260-88.
9. BLANTON, S. L. (2000), Promoting human rights and democracy in the developing world: US rhetoric versus US arms exports, American Journal of Political Science 44, 123-31.
10. BURKHART, R. and M. LEWIS-BECK (1994), Comparative democracy: the economic development thesis, American Political Science Review 88, 903-10.
11. Cox, D. R. (1972), Regression models and life tables, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34, 187-220.
12. DAVIDSON, J., D. HENDRY, F. SRBA and S. YEO (1978), Econometric modelling of the aggregate time-series relationship between consumers' expenditures and income in the United Kingdom, Economic Journal 88, 661-92.
13. FIORINA, M. (1994), Divided government in the American states - a byproduct of legislative professionalism, American Political Science Review 88, 304-16.
14. FORDING, R. (1997), The conditional effect of violence as a political tactic: mass insurgency, welfare generosity, and electoral context in the American states, American Journal of Political Science 41, 1-29.
15. FREEDMAN, D. and S. PETERS (1984), Bootstrapping a regression equation: some empirical results, Journal of the American Statistical Association 79, 97-106.
16. GARRETT, G. (1998), Partisan politics in the global economy, Cambridge University Press, New York.
17. GASIOROWSKI, M. J. (2000), Democracy and macroeconomic performance in underdeveloped countries: an empirical analysis, Comparative Political Studies 33, 319-49.
18. GELMAN, A., J. B. CARLIN, H. S. STERN and D. B. RUBIN (1995), Bayesian data analysis, Chapman & Hall, London.
19. GILES, M. and K. HERTZ (1994), Racial threat and partisan identification, American Politcal Science Review 88, 317-26.
20. GREENE, W. (1999), Econometric analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 4th edn.
21. GRIER, K and G. TULLOCK (1989), An empirical analysis of cross-national growth, 1951-80, Journal of Monetary Economics 24, 259-76.
22. HALL, P. and R. FRANZESE (1998), Mixed signals: central bank independence, coordinated wage bargaining, and European monetary union, International Organizations 52, 505-35.
23. HENDRY, D. and G. MIZON (1978), Serial correlation as a convenient simplification, not a nuisance: a comment on a study of the demand for money by the Bank of England, Economic Journal 88, 549-563.
24. HICKS, A. and L. KENWORTHY (1998), Cooperation and political economic performance in affluent democratic capitalism, American Journal of Sociology 103, 1631-72.
25. HOLLINGSWORTH, R., R. HANNEMAN, J. HAGE and C. RAGIN (1996), The effect of human capital and state intervention on the performance of medical systems, Social Forces 75, 459-84.
26. HSAIO, C. (1986), Analysis of panel data, Cambridge University Press, New York.
27. HURWICZ, L. (1950), Least-squares bias in time series, in T. KOOPMANS (ed.), Statistical inference in dynamic economic models, Wiley, New York, 365-83.
28. IVERSEN, T. (1998), Wage bargaining, central bank independence and the real effects of money, International Oragnizations 52, 469-504.
29. JUDGE, G., W. E. GRIFFITHS, R. C. HILL, H. LÜTKEPOHL and T-C. LEE (1985), The theory and practice of econometrics, Wiley, New York, 2nd edn.
30. KMENTA, J. (1986), Elements of econometrics, Macmillan, New York, 2nd edn.
31. LIANG, K.-Y. and S. L. ZEGER (1986), Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models, Biometrika 73, 13-22.
32. MADDALA, G. (1998), Recent developments in dynamic econometric modeling: a personal view-point, Political Analysis 7, 59-87.
33. MADDALA, G. S. and W. Hu (1996), The pooling problem, in L. MÁTYÁS AND p. SEVESTRE (eds.), The econometrics of panel data, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 307-22, 2nd edn.
34. MAOZ, Z. and B. M. RUSSETT (1993), Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946-1986, American Political Science Review 87, 639-56.
35. MONTANARI, I. (1999), From family assistance to suport for spouses and chldren: economic aid for families, 1950-1990 in 18 countries, Sociologisk Forskning Suppl. S, 218-52.
36. NEYMAN, J. and E. L. SCOTT (1948), Consistent estimation based on partially consistent observations, Econometrica 16, 1-32.
37. ONEAL, J. R. and B. M. RUSSETT (1997), The classical liberals were right: democracy, interdependence, and conflict, 1950-1985, International Studies Quarterly 41, 267-94.
38. PAMPEL, F. (1996), Cohort size and age specific suicide rates: a contingent relationship, Demography 33, 341-55.
39. PARKS, R. (1967), Efficient estimation of a sytem of regression equations when disturbances are both serially and contemporaneously correlated, Journal of the American Statistical Association 62, 500-509.
40. PINHEIRO, J. C. and D. M. BATES (2000), Mixed effects models in S and S-Plus, Springer, New York.
41. POE, S. C., C. N. TATE and L. C. KEITH (1999), Repression of the human rights to personal integrity revisited: a global cross-national study covering the years 1976-1993, International Studies Quarterly 43, 291-313.
42. RADCLIFFE, B. and P. DAVIS (2000), Labor organization and electoral participation in industrial democracies, American Journal of Political Science 44, 132-41.
43. SMITH, K. (1997), Explaining variation in state-level homicide rates: does crime policy pay?, Journal of Politics 59, 350-67.
44. STONE, M. (1974), Crossvalidatory choice and assessment of statistical prediction, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 36, 111-33.
45. Su, T., M. KAMLET and D. MOWERY (1993), Modeling United States budgetary and fiscal policy outcomes - a disaggregated, systemwide perspective, American Journal of Political Science 37, 213-245.
46. SUEYOSHI, G. T. (1995), A class of binary response models for grouped duration data, Journal of Applied Econometrics 10, 411-31.
47. SWAMY, P. A. V. B. (1971), Statistical inference in random coefficient models, Springer-Verlag, New York.
48. THEIL H. and A. S. GOLDBERGER (1961), On pure and mixed estimation in economics, International Economic Review 2, 65-78.
49. WESTERN, B. (1998), Causal heterogeneity in comparative research: a Bayesian hierarchaial modelling approach, American Journal of Political Science 42, 1233-59.
50. WHITE, H. (1980), A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroskedasticity, Econometrica 48, 817-38.