Ovules and seeds in subfamily phyllanthoideae (Euphorbiaceae): Structure and systematic implications

Journal of Plant Research

Volumn 114, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 75-92

  Tokuoka, Toru ^a   Tobe, Hiroshi ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Embryology; Euphorbiaceae; Ovule; Phyllanthoideae; Seed

Indexed keywords

ANTIDESMEAE; CLEISTANTHUS; DRYPETEAE; EUPHORBIA; EUPHORBIACEAE; HYMENOCARDIA;

EID: 0035533174     PISSN: 09189440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/pl00013970     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. APG (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group). 1998. An ordinal classification of the families of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 531-553.
2. Airy Shaw, H. K. 1965. Diagnoses of new families, new names, etc. for the seventh edition of Willis's "Dictionary." Kew Bull. 18: 249-272.
3. Corner, E.J.H. 1976. The seeds of Dicotyledons. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
4. Govaerts, R., Frodin, D. G. and Radcliffe-Smith, A. 2000. World checklist and bibliography of Euphorbiaceae (with Pandaceae). Redwood books limited, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, UK.
5. Köhler, E. 1965. Die Pollenmorphologie der biovulaten Euphorbiaceae und ihre Bedeutung für die Taxonomie. Grana Palynol. 6: 26-120.
6. Leonard, J. and Mosango, M. 1985. Hymenocardiaceae. In P. Bamps, ed., Flore d'Afrique Centrale: Spermatophytes. Jardin Botanique National de Belgique, Bruxelles, Goemaere. pp. 1-16.
7. Levin, G.A. 1986a. Systematic foliar morphology of Phyllanthoideae (Euphorbiaceae), I. Conspectus. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 73: 29-85.
8. Levin, G.A. 1986b. Systematic foliar morphology of Phyllanthoideae (Euphorbiaceae), II. Phenetic analysis. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 73: 86-98.
9. Levin, G.A. 1986c. Systematic foliar morphology of Phyllanthoideae III. Cladistic analysis. Syst. Bot. 11: 515-530.
10. Levin, G.A. and Simpson, M.G. 1994. Phylogenetic implications of pollen ultrastructure in the Oldfieldioideae (Euphorbiaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81: 203-238.
11. Meeuse, A.D.J. 1990. The Euphorbiaceae aucf. plur., an unnatural taxon. Eburon, Delft.
12. Radcliffe-Smith, A. 1987. Segregate families from the Euphorbiaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 94: 47-66.
13. Schmid, R. 1986. On cornerian and other terminology of angiospermous and gymnospermous seed coats: historical perspective and terminological recommendations. Taxon 35: 476-491.
14. Schmid, R. and Turner, M.D. 1977. Contrad 70, an effective softner of herbarium material for anatomical study. Taxon 26: 551-552.
15. Stuppy, W. 1996. Systematische Morphologie und Anatomie der Samen der biovulaten Euphorbiaceen. Diss. Kaiserslautem.
16. Tobe, H. and Raven, P.H. 1984. An embryological contribution to systematics of the Chrysobalanaceae. I. Tribe Chrysobalaneae. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 97: 397-411.
17. Tokuoka, T. and Tobe, H. 1995. Embryology and systematics of Euphorbiaceae sens. lat.: a review and perspective. J. Plant Res. 108: 97-106.
18. Tokuoka, T. and Tobe, H. 1999. Embryology of tribe Drypeteae, and enigmatic taxon of Euphorbiaceae. PI. Syst. Evol. 215: 189-208.
19. Von Teichman, I. and van Wyk, A.E. 1991. Trends in the evolution of dicotyledonous seeds based on character associations, with special reference to pachychalazy and recalcitrance. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 105: 211-237.
20. Webster, G.L. 1987. The saga of the spurges: a review of classification and relationships in the Euphorbiales. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 94: 3-46.
21. Webster, G.L. 1994a. Classification of the Euphorbiaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81: 3-32.
22. Webster, G.L. 1994b. Synopsis of the genera and suprageneric taxa of Euphorbiaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81: 33-144.