Curriculum politics in global perspective

Educational Policy

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 58-75

  Mitchell, Douglas E ^a   Boyd, William L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035531946     PISSN: 08959048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0895904801015001004     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Allington, R. L. (in press). The reading wars: What effect does literacy policy making have in the classroom? In T. Loveless (Ed.), Curriculum wars: Alternative approaches to reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
2. Askey, R. (in press). Good intentions are not enough. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Curriculum wars: Alternative approaches to reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
3. Battista, M. T. (in press). How do children learn mathematics? Research and reform in mathematics education. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Curriculum wars: Alternative approaches to reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
4. Boyd, W. L., & Mitchell, D. E. (in press). The politics of the reading wars. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Curriculum wars: Alternative approaches to reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
5. Burrill, G. (in press). Mathematics education: The future and the past create a context for today's issues. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Curriculum wars: Alternative approaches to reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
6. Chall, J. (1992, Winter). The new reading debates: Evidence from science, art, and ideology. Teachers College Record, 94(2), 315-328.
7. Chall, J. S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate (Rev. ed. 1983). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Davies, S., & Guppy, N. (1997, November). Globalization and educational reform in Anglo-American democracies. Comparative Education Review, 41(4), 435-459.
9. Flesch, R. (1955). Why Johnny can't read. New York: Harper and Row.
10. Foshay, A. W. (1990). Textbooks and the curriculum during the Progressive era. In D. L. Elliott & A. Woodward (Eds.), Textbooks and schooling in the United States: The eighty-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part 1, pp. 23-41). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Gamoran, A. (in press). Beyond curriculum wars: Teaching rigorous content for in-depth understanding in mathematics. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Curriculum wars: Alternative approaches to reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
12. Geary, D. C. (in press). How an understanding of evolution can inform instructional practices. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Curriculum wars: Alternative approaches to reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
13. Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (in press). The roots of the education wars. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Curriculum wars: Alternative approaches to reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
14. Loveless, T. (Ed.). (in press-a). Curriculum wars: Alternative approaches to reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
15. Loveless, T. (in press-b). A tale of two math reforms: The politics of the new math and the NCTM standards. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Curriculum wars: Alternative approaches to reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
16. Lyon, G. R., & Chabra, V. (1996). The current state of science and the future of specific reading disability. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 2, 2-9.
17. Moustafa, M. (in press). Contemporary reading instruction. In T. Loveless (Ed.). Curriculum wars: Alternative approaches to reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
18. Ravitch, D. (in press). It's time to stop the war. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Curriculum wars: Alternative approaches to reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
19. Reich, R. (1991). The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st century capitalism. New York: Alfred Knopf.
20. Shouse, R. (in press). The impact of traditional and reformed style practices on student mathematics achievement: Evidence from the National Education Longitudinal Study. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Curriculum wars: Alternative approaches to reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
21. Snow, C. E. (in press). The National Research Council report on preventing reading difficulties in young children: Precursors and fallout. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Curriculum wars: Alternative approaches to reading and mathematics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.