Whaddya mean you want to close my school? The politics of regulatory accountability in charter schooling

Education and Urban Society

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 141-156

  Hess, Frederick M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035530437     PISSN: 00131245     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013124501332004     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Arnold, R. D. (1990). The logic of Congressional action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2. Bierlein, L. A. (1997). The charter school movement. In D. Ravitch & J. P. Viteritti (Eds.), New schools for a new century: The redesign of urban education (pp. 37-60). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3. Center for Education Reform. (2000). Charter schools today: Changing the face of American education. Washington, DC: Author.
4. Chicago Public Schools. (1998). Accountability agreement. Mimeograph.
5. Chubb, J. E., Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
6. Cibulka, J. G., & Derlin, R. L. (1998). Authentic education accountability policies: Implementation of state initiatives in Colorado and Maryland. Educational Policy, 12, 84-97.
7. Cohen, D. K. (1996). Standards-based school reform: Policy, practice, and performance. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 99-127). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
8. Colorado League of Charter Schools. (1999). Draft Colorado accountability plan [Online], Available: http://www.charterfriends.org/accountability/cfi-accountability8.html#colorado
9. District of Columbia Public Charter School Board. (1998). Scoring rubrics for use with charter school application review criteria. Mimeograph.
10. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: HarperCollins.
11. Elmore, R. F., Abelmann, C. H., & Fuhrman, S. H. (1996). The new accountability iri state education reform: From process to performance. In H F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 65-98). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
12. Finn, C. E., Manno, B. V., & Vanourek, G. (2000). Charter schools in action: Renewing public education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Fuhrman, S. H. (1999). The new accountability (CPRE Policy Briefs RB-27-January). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
15. Garn, G. A., & Stout, R. T. (1999). Closing charters: How a good theory failed in practice. In R. Maranto, S. Milliman, F. Hess, & A. Gresham (Eds.), School choice in the real world (pp. 142-158). Boulder, CO: Westview.
16. Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. Hassel, B. C. (1999). The charter school challenge. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
18. Hassel, B. C., & Vergari, S. (1999). Charter-granting agencies: The challenges of oversight in a deregulated system. Education and Urban Society, 31, 406-428.
19. Hess, F. M. (1999). Spinning wheels: The politics of urban school reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
20. Hess, F. M., & Brigham, F. J. (2000). None of the above: The promise and perils of high-stakes testing. American School Board Journal, 187(1), 26-29.
21. Hill, P. T., Pierce, L. C., Lake, R., & Herdman, P. (1998, September 30). Charter schools: Accountability for results (Annual report draft). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
22. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
23. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: HarperCollins.
24. Macedo, S. (2000). Diversity and distrust: Civic education in a multicultural democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
25. Moe, T. M. (1989). The politics of bureaucratic structure. In J. Chubb & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), Can the government govern? (pp. 267-329). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26. Moe, T. M. (in press). Schools, vouchers, and the American public. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
27. Nathan, J. (1996). Charter schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Stone, D. A. (1997). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: Norton.
30. U.S. Department of Education. (2000). The state of charter schools 2000: National study of charter schools fourth-year report. Washington, DC: Author.
31. Vergari, S. (1999). Charter schools: A primer on the issue. Education and Urban Society, 31, 389-405.
32. Wells, A. S., Lopez, E., & Scott, J. (1999). Charter schools as postmodern paradox: Rethinking social stratification in an age of deregulated school choice. Harvard Educational Review, 69, 172-204.
33. Wells, A. S., & Research Associates. (1998). Charter school reform in California: Does it meet expectations? Phi Delta Kappan, 80(4), 305-312.
34. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
35. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. (1999). Wisconsin charter schools 1999. Madison: Author.