Reconnecting household and community: An alternative strategy for theory and policy

Journal of Family Issues

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 243-264

  Scanzoni, John H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035529310     PISSN: 0192513X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/019251301022002006     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Bell, D. (1990). Resolving the contradictions of modernity and modernism, part II. Society, 27, 66-75.
2. Berger, B. M. (1981). The survival of a counterculture: Ideological work and everyday life among rural communards. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Blitzer, S. (1991). "They are only children, what do they know?": A look at current ideologies of childhood. In E. Spencer (Ed.), Sociological studies of child development, vol. 4: Perspectives on and of children (pp. 11-28). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
4. Bott, E. (1957). Family and social network: Roles, norms, and external relationships in ordinary urban families. London: Tavistock.
5. Boulding, E. (1996). Book review. Contemporary Sociology, 25, 589-590.
6. Boyd, B. R., & Friedlander, S. (1997). Exploring the ideology of cohousing. The Journal of Cohousing, 9, 12-14.
7. Ciscel, D. H., Sharp, D. C., & Heath, J. A. (2000). Family work trends and practices: 1071 to 1991. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 21, 23-36.
8. Clawson, D. (1997). War on the poor. Contemporary Sociology, 26, vii.
9. Cohn, D. (1999, November 24). Parents' top goal: Raising thinkers. The Washington Post, pp. A8-10.
10. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11. Coleman, J. S. (1993). The rational reconstruction of society. American Sociological Review, 58, 1-15.
12. Corsaro, W. A. (1997). The sociology of childhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
13. de Singly, F. (1993). The social construction of anew paternal identity. In Fathers in families of tomorrow (pp. 42-75). Report from the conference. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Social Affairs.
14. Dizard, J. E., & Gadlin, H. (1990). The minimal family. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
15. Edwards, B., & Foley, M. W. (Eds.). (1997). Social capital, civil society, and contemporary democracy [Special issue]. American Behavioral Scientist, 40.
16. Etzioni, A. (2000). Creating good communities and good societies. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 188-195.
17. Facione, P. A. (1996). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.
18. Friedman, M. (1992). Feminism and modem friendship: Dislocating the community. In S. Avineri & A. De-Shalit (Eds.), Communitarianism and individualism (pp. 101-119). New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Fromm, D. (1991). Collaborative communities: Cohousing, central living, and other new forms of housing with shared facilities. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
20. Fromm, D. (2000). U.S. cohousing: The first five years. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 17, 94-109.
21. Furstenberg, F. (1999). Children and family change: Discourse between social scientists and the media. Contemporary Sociology, 28, 10-17.
22. Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond left and right: The future of radical politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23. Giddens, A. (1995). Affluence, poverty, and the idea of a post-scarcity society. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
24. Glenn Nakano, E. (2000). Creating a caring society. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 84-94.
25. Gordon, M. (1958). Social class in American sociology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26. Gordon, M. (1978). The American family: Past, present, and future. New York: Random House.
27. Gutman, A. (1992). Communitarian critics of liberalism. In S. Avineri & A. De-Shalit (Eds.), Communitarianism and individualism (pp. 120-136). New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Harris, J. R. (1998). The nurture assumption: Why children turn out the way they do. New York: Free Press.
29. Heclo, H. (1995). The social question. In K. McFate, R. Lawson, & W. J. Wilson (Eds.), Poverty, inequality, and the future of social policy (pp. 665-692). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
30. Horelli, L., & Vespa, K. (1994). In search of supportive structures for everyday life. In I. Altman & A. Churchman (Eds.), Women and the environment (pp. 201-226). New York: Plenum.
31. Judd, D. R. (1995). The rise of the new walled cities. In H. Liggett & D. C. Perry (Eds.), Spatial practices: Critical explorations in social/spatial theory (pp. 144-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Kanter, R. M. (1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American Sociological Review, 33, 499-517.
33. Kanter, R. M. (1972). Commitment and community: Communes and utopias in sociological perspective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
34. Kohn, M. L. (1963). Social class and parental relationships: An interpretation. American Journal of Sociology, 68, 335-347.
35. Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (1998). The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the Western countries. American Sociological Review, 63, 661-687.
36. Levi-Strauss, C. (1957). The principle of reciprocity. In L. A. Coser & B. Rosenberg (Eds.), Sociological theory (pp. 84-94). New York: Macmillan.
37. Macarov, D. (1995). Social welfare: Structure and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Marshall, T. H. (1949). Citizenship and social class. Alfred Marshall Lectures given at Cambridge University; reprinted in T. H. Marshall, Class, citizenship, and social development. New York: Doubleday, 1965.
39. Mason, M. A., Skolnick, A., & Sugarman, S. D. (1998). All our families: New policies for a new century. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. McFate, K. (1995). Introduction: Western states in the new world order. In K. McFate, R. Lawson, & W. J. Wilson (Eds.), Poverty, inequality, and the future of social policy (pp. 1-28). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
41. Mead, M. (1967). The life cycle and its variations: The division of roles. Daedalus, 96, 871-875.
42. Meltzer, G. (2000). Cohousing: Verifying the importance of community in the application of environmentalism. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research, 17, 110-132.
43. Myles, J., & Quadagno, J. (2000). Envisioning a third way: The welfare state in the twenty-first century. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 156-167.
44. Nisbet, R. A. (1953). The quest for community: A study in the ethics of order and freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Parsons, T. (1955). The American family: Its relations to personality and to the social structure. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Family, socialization and interaction process (pp. 3-33). New York: Free Press.
46. Popenoe, D. (1996). Modern marriage: Revising the cultural script. In D. Popenoe, J. B. Elshtain, & D. Blankenhorn (Eds.), Promises to keep: Decline and renewal of marriage in America (pp. 247-270). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
47. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
48. Research Group. (1991). The new everyday life: Ways and means. Stockholm: The Nordic Council.
49. Risman, B. J. (1998). Gender vertigo: American families in transition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50. Risman, B. J., & Ferree, M. M. (1995). Making gender visible. American Sociological Review, 60, 775-782.
51. Rivers, R. M., & Scanzoni, J. H. (1997). Social families among African-Americans: Policy implications for children. In H. P. McAdoo (Ed.), Black families (pp. 333-348). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52. Rothschild, J. (2000). Creating a just and democratic workplace: More engagement, less hierarchy. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 195-213.
53. Rubin, B. A. (1996). Shifts in the social contract: Understanding change in American society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
54. Scanzoni, J. H. (2000). Designing families - The search for self and community in the information age. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
55. Scanzoni, J. H. (in press). From the standard family to alternate lifestyles to the quest for household diversity. Journal of Family Issues.
56. Skocpol, T. (1991). Targeting within universalism: Politically viable policies to combat poverty in the United States. In C. Jencks & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass (pp. 411-435). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
57. Spiro, M. E. (1963). Kibbutz: Venture in utopia. New York: Shocken Books.
58. Stacey, J. (1999). Virtual truth with a vengeance. Contemporary Sociology, 28, 18-22.
59. Stack, C. (1974). All our kin - Strategies for survival in a Black community. New York: Harper & Row.
60. Stoller, F. H. (1970). The intimate network of families as a new structure. In H. A. Otto (Ed.), The family in search of a future (pp. 145-160). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
61. Stone, L. (1979). The family, sex, and marriage in England, 1500-1800 (abridged). New York: Harper & Row.
62. Tarnay, S. (1999). A new model for urban cohousing. The Journal of Cohousing, 12, 7-12.
63. Tichenor, V. J. (1999). Status and income as gendered resources: The case of marital power. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 638-650.
64. Torres, M. (2000). Creating fictive kin in contemporary cohousing. Unpublished dissertation. University of Florida, Gainesville.
65. Veevers, J. E. (1980). Childless by choice. Toronto: Butterworths.
66. Vestbro, D. U. (2000). From collective housing to cohousing - A summary of research. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research, 17, 164-178.
67. Wall, H. M. (1990). Fierce communion: Family and community in early America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68. Watts, J. (1997). The end of work and the end of welfare. Contemporary Sociology, 26, 409-412.
69. Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Scribner.
70. Zelizer, V. (1985). Pricing the priceless child: The changing social value of children. New York: Basic Books.