Complexity of the likelihood surface for a large DNA dataset

Systematic Biology

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 970-978

  Salter, Laura A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMETRY; GENETICS; NUCLEIC ACID DATABASE; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BIOMETRY; DATABASES, NUCLEIC ACID; DNA; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 0035527401     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106351501753462902     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. BROWN, E., AND W. DAY. 1984. A computationally efficient approximation to the nearest neighbor interchange metric. J. Classif. 1:93-124.
2. CHAN, S., H. BERNARD, S. ONG, S. CHAN, B. HOFMANN, AND H. DELIUS. 1992. Phylogenetic analysis of 48 papillomavirus types and 28 subtypes and variants: A showcase for the molecular evolution of DNA viruses. J. Virol. 66:5714-5725.
3. CHAN, S., H. DELIUS, A. HALPERN, AND H. BERNARD. 1995. Analysis of genomic sequences of 95 papillomavirus types: Uniting typing, phylogeny, and taxonomy. J. Virol. 69:3074-3083.
4. CHANG, J. 1996. Full reconstruction of Markov models on evolutionary trees: identifiability and consistency. Math. Bio. 137:51-73.
5. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
6. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1984. Distance methods for inferring phylogenies: A justification. Evolution 38:16-24.
7. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1993. PHYLIP (Phylogenetic inference package), version 3.5p. Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
8. GOLDMAN, N. 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 36:182-198.
9. HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, AND N. SAITOU. 1991. On the maximum likelihood method in molecular phylogenetics. J. Mol. Evol. 32:443-545.
10. KISHINO, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
11. LEWIS, P. 1998. A genetic algorithm for maximumlikelihood phylogeny inference using nucleotide sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:277-283.
12. MADDISON, D. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Syst. Zool. 40:315-328.
13. ONG, C., S. NEE, A. RAMBAUT, H. BERNARD, AND P. HARVEY. 1997. Elucidating the population histories and transmission dynamics of papillomaviruses using phylogenetic trees. J. Mol. Evol. 44:199-206.
14. PAGE, R. 1993. On islands of trees and the efficacy of different methods of branch swapping in finding most-parsimonious trees. Syst. Biol. 42:200-210.
15. PAGE, R. 2001. COMPONENT, version 2.0. The Natural History Museum, London.
16. ROGERS, J. 1997. On the consistency of maximum likelihood estimation of phylogenetic trees from nucleotide sequences. Syst. Biol. 46:354-357.
17. SALTER, L. 1999. Simulation-based estimation of phylogenetic trees. Ph.D.Dissertation, Ohio State Univ., Columbus.
18. SALTER, L., AND D. PEARL. 2001. Stochastic search strategy for estimation of maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 50:7-17.
19. SANDERSON, M., AND J. KIM. 2000. Parametric phylogenetics? Syst. Biol. 49:817-829.
20. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
21. YANG, Z. 1994. Statistical properties of the maximum likelihood method of phylogenetic estimation and comparison with distance matrix methods. Syst. Biol. 43:329-342.