Using segmented linear regression models with unknown change points to analyze strategy shifts in cognitive tasks

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 470-478

  Luwel, Koen ^a   Beem, A Leo ^b   Onghena, Patrick ^a   Verschaffel, Lieven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EVALUATION; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ATTENTION; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0035524049     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195404     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ALDERTON, D. L., & LARSON, G. E. (1994). Cross-task consistency in strategy use and the relationship with intelligence. Intelligence, 18, 47-76.
2. BAI, J. (1999). Likelihood ratio tests for multiple structural changes. Journal of Econometrics, 91, 299-323.
3. BEEM, A. L. (1993). Segcurve: A program for fitting two-phase segmented curve models with an unknown change point [Program manual]. Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University, Educational Computing Research Unit.
4. BEEM, A. L. (1995). A program for fitting two-phase segmented-curve models with an unknown change point, with an application to the analysis of strategy shifts in a cognitive task. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 392-399.
5. BEEM, A. L. (1999). SegcurvN: A program for fitting segmented curve models with unknown change points [Program manual]. Amsterdam: Free University, Department of Biological Psychology.
6. BROWN, R. L., DURBIN, J., & EVANS, J. M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 37, 149-163.
7. CHEN, J., & GUPTA, A. K. (2000). Parametric change point analysis. Boston: Birkhäuser.
8. CSÖRGÕ, M., & HORVÁTH, L. (1997). Limit theorems in change-point analysis. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
9. HUDSON, D. J. (1966). Fitting segmented curves whose join points have to be estimated. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 61, 1097-1129.
10. IPPEL, M. J., & BEEM, A. L. (1987). A theory of antagonistic strategies. In E. De Corte, H. Lodewijks, R. Parmentier, & P. Span (Eds.), Learning and instruction: European research in an international context (Vol. 1. pp. 111-121). Leuven: Leuver University Press.
11. JUDGE, G. C., GRIFFITHS, W. E., HILL, R.C., LÜTKEPOHL, H., & LEE, T.-C. (1985). The theory and practice of econometrics. New York: Wiley.
12. KYLLONEN, P. C., LOHMAN, D. F., & WOLTZ, D. J. (1984). Componentional modelling of alternative strategies for performing spatial tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1325-1345.
13. LEMAIRE, P., & SIEGLER, R. S. (1995). Four aspects of strategic change: Contributions to children's learning of multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 83-97.
14. LUWEL, K., VERSCHAFFEL, L., ONGHENA, P., & DE CORTE, E. (2001). Strategic aspects of children's numerosity judgement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 17, 233-255.
15. MARSH, G., FRIEDMAN, M., WELCH, V., & DESBERG, P. (1980). The development of strategies in spelling. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 339-354). London: Academic Press.
16. MCGILLY, K., & SIEGLER, R. S. (1990). The influence of encoding and strategic knowledge on children's choices among serial recall strategies. Developmental Psychology, 26, 931-941.
17. MYERS, R. H. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (2nd ed.). Boston: PWS-Kent.
18. NETER, J., KUTNER, M. H., NACHTSHEIM, C. J., & WASSERMAN, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models (4th ed.). Chicago: Irwin.
19. NEWELL, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. NEWMAN, S. R., & BERGER, C. F. (1984). Children's numerical estimation: Flexibility in the use of counting. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 55-64.
21. QUANDT, R. E. (1958). The estimation of the parameters of a linear regression system obeying two separate regimes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, 873-880.
22. SCHWEDER, T. (1976). Some "optimal" methods to detect structural shift or outliers in regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 491-501.
23. SIEGLER, R. S. (1987). Strategy choices in subtraction. In J. A. Sloboda & D. Rogers (Eds.), Cognitive processes in mathematics (pp. 81-106). Oxford: Clarendon.
24. SIEGLER, R. S., & ROBINSON, M. (1982). The development of numerical understandings. In H. W. Reese & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 16, pp. 241-312). New York: Academic Press.
25. VERSCHAFFEL, L., DE CORTE, E., LAMOTE, C., & DHERT, N. (1998). The acquisition and use of an adaptive strategy for estimating numerosity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13, 347-370.