Roles of research scientists in natural resource decision-making

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 153, Issue 1-3, 2001, Pages 189-198

  Mills, Thomas J ^a   Clark, Roger N ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision analysis; Ecosystem management; Forest management; Interior Columbia River Basin; Science and policy

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECOSYSTEMS; RIVER BASIN PROJECTS;

NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

NATURAL RESOURCES;

DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; NATURAL RESOURCE;

EID: 0035499587     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00461-3     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Integrating science and policy in natural resource management. Lessons and opportunities from North America
2. Toward an ecological approach: Integrating social, economic, cultural, biological, and physical considerations
3. Sustaining the people's lands: Recommendations for stewardship of the National Forests and Grasslands into the next century
4. Evaluation of the use of scientific information in developing the 1997 forest plan for the Tongass National Forest
5. Putting wildlife science to work: Influencing public policy
6. Science, values, and human judgment
7. Peer review and the regulatory process
8. The savvy salmon technocrat: Life's little rules
9. Learning and change in the BC forest policy sector: A consideration of Sabatier's advocacy coalition framework
10. Science and policy in integrated watershed management: A case study
11. Entering the century of the environment: A new social contract for science
12. Social sciences and ecosystems: An overview of the role of social sciences in the Interior Columbia Ecosystem Management Project
13. Advocacy as part of conservation biology
14. Combining science and policy in conservation biology
15. Organizational and legal challenges for ecosystem management
16. Conservation values, conservation science: A healthy tension
17. Position advocacy by scientists risks science credibility and may be unethical
18. Science-management collaboration: Lessons from the revision of the Tongass National Forest Plan
19. Scientists and professional responsibility: The experience of American ecologists
20. The professional biologist: Being a scientist means taking sides
21. Science in environmental conflicts
22. Uncertainty, ignorance, and policy
23. Implementing sustainability in west coast forest: CORE and FEMAT as experiments in process
24. Science advocacy is inevitable: Deal with it
25. Walking the line: Science versus advocacy
26. Uncertainty arguments in environmental issues
27. The politics of science in international resource management: A summary
28. Reasonableness versus rationality in the construction and justification of science policy decisions: The case of the Cambridge experimentation review board
29. Policy research as advocacy: Pro and con