Typological predictions in developmental phonology

Journal of Child Language

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 597-628

  Dinnsen, Daniel A ^a   O'Connor, Kathleen M ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; HUMAN; INFANT; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; PHONETICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

CHILD LANGUAGE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; HUMANS; INFANT; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; PHONETICS; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0035495837     PISSN: 03050009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0305000901004780     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barlow, J. A. & Gierut, J. A. (1999). Optimality theory in phonological acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42, 1482-98.
2. Bernhardt, B. H. & Stemberger, J. P. (1998). Handbook of phonological development from the perspective of constraint-based nonlinear phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.
3. Clements, G. N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In J. Kingston & M. E. Beckman (eds), Papers in laboratory phonology 1 : between the grammar and physics of speech. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Compton, A. J. & Streeter, M. (1977). Child phonology: data collection and preliminary analyses. In E. V. Clark & P. Tiedt (eds), Papers and reports on child language development 13. Stanford, CA: Department of Linguistics.
5. Dinnsen, D. A. (1996). Context-sensitive underspecification and the acquisition of phonemic contrasts. Journal of Child Language 23, 57-79.
6. Dinnsen, D. A. (1998). On the organization and specification of manner features. Journal of Linguistics 34, 1-25.
7. Dinnsen, D. A. (1999). Some empirical and theoretical issues in disordered child phonology. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (eds), Handbook of child language acquisition. New York: Academic Press.
8. Dinnsen, D. A. & Barlow, J. A. (1998). Root and manner feature faithfulness in acquisition. In A. Greenhill, M. Hughes, H. Littlefield & H. Walsh (eds), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
9. Gierut, J. A. (1998). Treatment efficacy: functional phonological disorders in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 30, S85-S100.
10. Gnanadesikan, A. E. (1996). Child phonology in optimality theory: ranking markedness and faithfulness constraints. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes & A. Zukowski (eds), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
11. Goad, H. (1997). Consonant harmony in child language: an optimality-theoretic account. In S. J. Hannahs & M. Young-Scholten (eds), Focus on phonological acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
12. Halle, M. (1995). Feature geometry and feature spreading. Linguistic Inquiry 26, 1-46.
13. Ingram, D. (1989). Phonological disability in children. London: Cole and Whurr.
14. Itô, J., Mester, A. & Padgett, J. (1995). Licensing and underspecification in optimality theory. Linguistic Inquiry 26, 571-613.
15. Kager, R. (1999). Optimality theory. Cambridge: C.U.P.
16. Kenstowicz, M. (1994). Phonology in generative grammar. Cambridge: Blackwell.
17. Kiparsky, P. (1973). 'Elsewhere' in phonology. In S. R. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (eds), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
18. Kiparsky, P. (1994). Remarks on markedness. Paper presented at TREND 2.
19. Levelt, C. & Van de Vijver, R. (1998). Syllable types in cross-linguistic and developmental grammars. Paper presented at the Third Biannual Utrecht Phonology Workshop [Rutgers Optimality Archive 265].
20. Locke, J. (1980). The inference of speech perception in the phonologically disordered child, part II: some clinically novel procedures, their use, some findings. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 45, 445-68.
21. Lubowicz, A. (1998). Derived environment effects in OT [Rutgers Optimality Archive 239].
22. McCarthy, J. J. (1988). Feature geometry and dependency: a review. Phonetica 45, 84-108.
23. McCarthy, J. J. (1999). Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology 16, 331-399.
24. McCarthy, J. J. & Prince, A. S. (1993). Prosodic morphology 1: constraint interaction and satisfaction: technical report #3. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science.
25. McCarthy, J. J. & Prince, A. S. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. N. Beckman, L. W. Dickey & S. Urbanczyk (eds), University of Massachusetts occasional papers 18 : papers in optimality theory. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
26. Padgett, J. (1995). Feature classes. In J. N. Beckman, L. W. Dickey & S. Urbanczyk (eds), University of Massachusetts occasional papers 18 : papers in optimality theory. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
27. Pater, J. (1997a). Minimal violation and phonological development. Language Acquisition 6, 201-53.
28. Pater, J. (1997b). Non-local assimilations in child language. Paper presented at the Hopkins Optimality Workshop/Maryland Mayfest.
29. Pater, J. (1999). Austronesian nasal substitution and other NC effects. In R. Kager, H. van der Hulst & W. Zonneveld (eds), The prosody-morphology interface. Cambridge: C.U.P.
30. Prince, A. S. & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar : technical report #2. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science.
31. Pulleyblank, D. (1997). Optimality theory and features. In D. Archangeli & T. Langendoen (eds), Optimality theory : an overview. Cambridge: Blackwell.
32. Smit, A. B. (1993). Phonologic error distributions in the Iowa-Nebraska Articulation Norms Project: consonant singletons. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36, 533-47.
33. Smith, N. V. (1973). The acquisition of phonology : a case study. Cambridge: C.U.P.
34. Smolensky, P. (1995). On the structure of the constraint component Con of UG. Paper presented at UCLA.
35. Smolensky, P. (1996). On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 27, 720-31.
36. Stoel-Gammon, C. & Stemberger, J. P. (1994). Consonant harmony and phonological underspecification in child speech. In M. Yavas (ed.), First and second language phonology. San Diego, CA: Singular.
37. Tesar, B. & Smolensky, P. (1998). Learnability in optimality theory. Linguistic Inquiry 29, 229-68.
38. Vihman, M. M. (1978). Consonant harmony: its scope and function in child language. In J. H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language 2: phonology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
39. Walker, R. (1999). Reinterpreting transparency in nasal harmony. Paper presented at the HIL Phonology Conference 4. [Rutgers Optimality Archive 306].
40. Weiner, F. F. (1981). Treatment of phonological disability using the method of meaningful minimal contrast: two case studies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 46, 97-103.
41. Weismer, G. (1984). Acoustic analysis strategies for the refinement of phonological analysis. In M. Elbert, D. A. Dinnsen & G. Weismer (eds), Phonological theory and the misarticulating child. Rockville, MD: ASHA.