Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT), Broad Band Ultrasound Attenuation (BUA) and Speed of Sound (SOS) in a population of normal females aged from 8 to 20 years;Tomografia quantitativa periferica (pQCT), attenuazione a larga banda (BUA) e velocità degli ultrasuoni (SOS) in una popolazione normale (426 femmine) di età variabile da 8 a 20 anni

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 217-221

  Bagni, Bruno ^a,c   Corazzari, Tolmino ^a   Saccani Jotti, Gloria ^b   Casolo, Alessandra ^a   Franceschetto, Antonella ^a   Romagnoli, Renata ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY CAMPUS BIO MEDICO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Peripheral computed tomography; Ultrasound attenuation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE; BONE DENSITY; CHILD; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REFERENCE VALUE; TOMOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BONE AND BONES; BONE DENSITY; CHILD; ENGLISH ABSTRACT; FEMALE; HUMAN; REFERENCE VALUES; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0035488420     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cetin A, Erturk H, Celiker R e Coll: The role of quantitative ultrasound in predicting osteoporosis defined by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Rheumatol Int 20: 55-59, 2001.
2. Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I: Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 16: 406-416, 2001.
3. Jorgensen H, Warming L, Bjarnason N e Coll: How does quantitative ultrasound compare to dual X-ray absorptiometry at various skeletal sires in relation to the WHO diagnosis categories? Clin Physiol 21: 51-59, 2001.
4. Dubois EF, van den Bergh JP, Smals AG e Coll: Comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in pre and post-menopausal women. Neth J Med 58: 62-70, 2001.
5. Karlsson MK, Duan Y, Ahlborg H e Coll: Age, gender, and fragility fractures are associated with differences in quantitative ultrasound independent of bone mineral density. Bone 28: 118-122, 2001.
6. Wunsche K, Wunsche B, Fahnrich H e Coll: Ultrasound bone densitometry of the os calcis in children and adolescents. Calcif Tissue Int 67: 349-355, 2000.
7. Van den Bergh JP, Noordam C, Ozyilmaz A e Coll: Calcaneal ultrasound imaging in healthy children and adolescents: relation of the ultrasound parameters BUA and SOS to age, body weight, height, foot dimensions and puberal stage. Osteoporos Int 11: 967-976, 2000.
8. Njeh CF, Hans D, Li J e Coll: Comparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: precision and hip fracture discrimination. Osteoporos Int 11: 1051-1062, 2000.
9. Nicholson PH, Bouxsein ML: Quantitative ultrasound does not reflect mechanically induced damage in human cancellous bone. J Bone Miner Res 15: 2467-2472, 2000.
10. Njeh CF, Shaw N, Gardner-Medwin JM e Coll: Use of quantitative ultrasound to assess bone status in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot study. J Clin Densitom 3: 251-260, 2000.
11. Pocock NA, Culton NL, Gilbert GR e Coll: Potential roles for quantitative ultrasound in the management of osteoporosis. Med J Aust 173: 355-358, 2000.
12. Phillipov G, Holsman M, Phillips PJ: The clinical role of quantitative ultrasound in assessing fracture risk and bone status. Med J Aust 173: 208-211, 2000.
13. Gluer CC, Barkmann R, Heller M: Quantitative ultrasonic diagnosis for the assessment of osteoporosis. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 94: 461-468, 2000.
14. Maricic M, Chen Z: Bone densitometry. Clin Lab Med 20: 469-488, 2000.
15. Louis O, Allein S, Luypaert R e Coll: Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: an in vivo comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Densitom 3: 43-48, 2000.
16. Lehtonen-Veromaa M, Mottonen T, Nuotio I e Coll: Influence of physical activity on ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements in peripubertal girls: a cross-sectional study. Calcif Tissue Int 66: 248-254, 2000.
17. Diessel E, Fuerst T, Njeh C e Coll: Comparison of an imaging heel quantitative ultrasound device (DTU-one) with densitometric and ultrasonic measureraents.Br J Radiol 73: 23-30, 2000.
18. Njeh CF, Hans D, Wu C e Coll: An in vitro investigation of the dependence on sample thickness of the speed ofsound along the specimen. Med Eng Phys 21: 651-659, 2000.
19. Hamanaka Y, Yamamoto I, Takada M e Coll: Comparison of bone mineral density at various skeletal sites with quantitative ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus for assessment of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Metab 17: 195-200, 1999.
20. Iki M, Kajita E, Mitamura S, Nishino H e Coll: Precision of quantitative ultrasound measurement of the heel bone and effects of ambient temperature on the parameters. Osteoporos Int 10: 462-467, 1999.
21. Njeh CF, Fuerst T, Hans D e Coll: Radiation exposure in bone mineral density assessment. Appl Radiat Isot 50: 215-236, 1999.
22. Di Leo C, Tarolo GL, Bestetti A e Coll: Assessment of geometric, biomechanical, and osteodensitometric properties of the ultradistal radius with peripheral quantitative computerized tomography in uremic patients with severe hyperparathyroidism.Radiol Med 97: 229-235, 1999.
23. Bagni B, Palazzi G, Bagni I e Coll: pQCT (quantitative peripheral tomography) and data evaluation of phosphocalcic metabolism in thalassaemic patients. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 11: 791-794, 1998.