In vitro fatigue resistance of glass ionomer cements used in post-and-core applications

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 149-155

  Gateau, Philippe ^a,b   Sabek, Marc ^a   Dailey, Bruno ^a  

^a University of Paris Est   (France)

^b NONE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEMENT; DENTAL ALLOY; FUJI IX; GLASS IONOMER; SHOFU HIGH DENSE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH CROWN;

CERMET CEMENTS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; MATERIALS TESTING; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0035430859     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2001.114882     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Nayyar A, Walton RE, Leonard LA. An amalgam coronal-radicular dowel and core technique for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:511-5.
2. Hoag EP, Dwyer TG. A comparative evaluation of three post and core techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:177-81.
3. Perel ML, Muroff FI. Clinical criteria for posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:405-11.
4. Stahl GH, O'Neal RB. The composite resin dowel and core. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:642-8.
5. McLean JW, Gasser O. Glass-cermet cements. Quintessence Int 1985;16:333-43.
6. Swift EJ Jr, Pawlus MA, Vargas MA, Fortin D. Depth of cure of resin-modified glass ionomers. Dent Mater 1995;11:196-200.
7. Wilson AD, McLean JW. Glass-ionomer cements. Chicago (IL): Quintessence; 1988. p.60-8.
8. Osborne JW, Albino JE. Psychological and medical effects of mercury intake from dental amalgam. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1999;12:151-6.
9. Schuurs AH. Reproductive toxicity of occupational mercury. A review of the literature. J Dent 1999;27:249-56.
10. Nakajima H, Wataha JC, Rockwell LC, Okabe T. In vitro cytotoxicity of amalgams made with binary Hg-In liquid alloys. Dent Mater 1997;13:168-73.
11. Skare I, Engqvist A. Human exposure to mercury and silver released from dental amalgam restorations. Arch Environ Health 1994;49:384-94.
12. Bratel J, Haraldson T, Meding B, Yontchev E, Ohman SC, Ottosson JO. Potential side effects of dental amalgam restorations. I. An oral and medical investigation. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:234-43.
13. Bratel J, Haraldson T, Ottosson JO. Potential side effects of dental amalgam restorations. II. No relation between mercury levels in the body and mental disorders. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:244-50.
14. Holmgren CJ, Frencken JE. Painting the future for ART. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:449-53.
15. Mjor IA, Gordan VV. A review of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), Int Dent J 1999;49:127-31.
16. Vaikuntam J. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM GICs) implications for use in pediatric dentistry. ASDC J Dent Child 1997;64:131-4.
17. Christensen CJ. Restoration of pediatric posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:106-8.
18. Millstein PL, Ho J, Nathanson D. Retention between a serrated steel dowel and different core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:480-2.
19. Taleghani M, Leinfielder KF. Evaluation of a new glass ionomer cement with silver as a core buildup under a cast restoration. Quintessence Int 1988;19:19-24.
20. Arcoria CJ, DeWald JP, Moody CR, Ferracane JL. A comparative study of the bond strengths of amalgam and alloy-glass ionomer cores. J Oral Rehabil 1989;16:301-7.
21. Cohen BI, Deutsch AS, Condos S, Musikant BL, Scherer W. Compressive and diametral tensile strength of titanium-reinforced composites. J Esthetic Dent 1992;4(Suppl):50-5.
22. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997;76:883-94.
23. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Longevity in glass-ionomer restorations: review of a successful technique. Quintessence Int 1997;78:643-40.
24. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Micro magnetic resonance imaging of water uptake by glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1997;78:20-3.
25. Gateau P, Sabek M, Dailey B. Fatigue testing and microscipic evaluation of post and core restorations under artificial crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:341-7.
26. Kovarik RE, Breedings LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:584-90.
27. Carter JM, Sorensen SE, Johnson RR, Teitelbaum RL, Levine MS. Punch shear testing of extracted vital and endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech 1983;16:841-8.
28. Strawn SE, White JM, Marshall GW, Gee L, Goodis HE, Marshall SJ. Spectroscopic changes in human dentine exposed to various storage solutions - short term. J Dent 1996;24:417-23.
29. Mollersten L. Machinability of some dentin simulating materials. Swed Dent J 1985;9:219-24.
30. Waltimo A, Kononen M. A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:171-5.
31. Braun S, Hnat WP, Freudenthaler JW, Marcotte MR, Honigle K, Johnson BE. A study of maximum bite force during growth and development. Angle Orthod 1996;66:261-4.
32. Lundeen H, Gibbs HC. Advances in occlusion. Bristol: J Wright; 1982. p. 22.
33. Bakke M, Holm B, Jensen BL, Michler L, Moller E. Unilateral, isometric bite force in 8-68-year-old women and men related to occlusal factors. Scan J Dent Res 1990;98:149-58.
34. Huysmans MC, van der Varst PG. Mechanical longevity estimation model for post-and-core restorations. Dent Mater 1995;11:252-7.
35. Rupert G, Miller Jr, McGraw H. Simultaneous statistical inference. London: McGraw-Hill; 1996. p. 165-72.
36. Hunt PR, Gogarnoiu D. Evolution of post and core systems. J Esthet Dent 1996;8:74-83.
37. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 1996;27:203-9.