Evolution of Post and Core Systems

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 74-83

  Hunt, Peter R ^a   Gogarnoiu, Dumitru ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; TOOTH CROWN;

COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; TOOTH PREPARATION;

EID: 0030309175     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1996.tb00888.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Trabert KCCooney JP. The endodontically treated toth: Restorative concepts and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 1984: 28(4): 02–951.
2. Jacobi R, Shillinghurg HT. Pins, dowels, and other retentive devices in posterior teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1993; 37(3): 36–390.
3. Markley MR. Pin reinforced and retention of amalgam foundations and restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1958; 56: 67–679.
4. Going RE. Pin retained amalgam. J Am Dent Assoc 1966; 73: 61–624.
5. Webb EL, Straka WI, Phillips CL. Tooth crazing associated with threaded pins: A three-dimensional model. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 62–628.
6. Eriksen HM, Buonocore MG. Marginal leakage with different composite restorative materials in vitro: Effect of cavity design. J Oral Rehabil 1976; 3: 31–322.
7. Pashley DH. Clinical correlations of dentine structure and function. J Prosthet Dent 1991: 66:77–781.
8. Frederick DR. An application of the dowel and composite resin core techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1974; 33: 42–424.
9. Spanauf AJ. Dowel and core foundations using the composite Adaptic. Quintessence Int 1972; 4: 4–51.
10. Stabl CJ, O’Neal RB. The composite resin dowel and core. J Prosthet Dent 1975; 33: 64–648.
11. Steele GD. Reinforced composite resin foundations for endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 30: 81–819.
12. Deutsch AS. Musikant BL. Cavallari J. Lepley JB. Prefabricated dowels: A literature review, J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 49–503.
13. Felton DA Webb EL, Kanoy BE, Dugoni J. Threaded enodontic. dowels: Effect of post design on incidence of root fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 17–187.
14. Deutsch AS, Cavallari J, Musikant BL, et al. Root fracture and the design of prefabricated posts. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 63–640.
15. Colley IT, Hompson EL, Lehman ML. Retention of post crowns: An assessment of the relative efficiency of posts of different shapes and sizes. Br Dent J 1968; 124: 6–69.
16. Standlee JP, Caputo AAHanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: Effects of cement, dowel length. diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978: 39:40–405.
17. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 2–35.
18. Hemmings K W, King A Setebell DJ. Resistance to torsional forces of various post and core designs. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 32–329.
19. Assif D, Ferber A. Retention of dowels using a composite resin as a cementing medium. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48: 29–296.
20. Goldman M, DeVitre R White R, Nathanson D. An SEM study of posts cemented with an unfilled resin. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 100–1005.
21. Davidson CL, Van Zeghbroeck L, Feilzer AJ. Destructive stresses in adhesive luting cements. J Dent Res 1991: 70:88–882.
22. Van Zeghbroeck L. Bond capacity of adhesive luting cements. PhD thesis, University of Louvain. 1989.
23. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985; 1: 10–111.
24. Krupp JD, Caputo AA Trabert KC. Standler JP. Dowel retention with glass ionomer cement. J Prosthet Dent 1979: 41:16–166.
25. McLean JW, Gasser O. Glass-cermet cements. Quintessence Int 1995: 5:33–343.
26. Kao EC. Fracture resistance of pin retained amalgam. composite resin, and alloy-reinforced glass ionomer core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 46–471.
27. Millstein PL, Ho J, Nathanson D. Retention between a serrated steel dowel and different core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 48–482.
28. Lloyd CH, Butchart DGM. The retention of core composites: glass ionomers and cermets by a self threading dentin pin: The influence of fracture toughness upon failure. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 18–188.
29. Morgano SM, Milor P. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70: 1–10.
30. Chang W-C, Millstein PL. Effect of design of prefabricated post heads on core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 57–582.
31. Gordon FL. Post preparations: A comparison of three systrms. J Mich Dent Assoc 1982; 64: 30–304.
32. Gegauff AG, Kerby RE, Rosensteil SE. A comparative study of post preparation diameters and deviations using para-post and Gates Glidden drills. J Endod 1988; 14: 37–380.
33. Hadix JE, Mattison GD, Schulman CA, et al. Post preparation techniques and their effect on the apical seal. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 51–519.
34. Conrow G, Burgess JO, Cronin RJ. Kaiser DJ. Dimensional stability of three core materials restored with cast crowns. J Dent Res 1991: 72:216. (Abstr).
35. Lattner MJ Norling B, Kaiser DJ. Fracture resistance of four core materials restored with cast crowns. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 413. (Abstr).