Cross-reactivity patterns of contact-sensitizing methacrylates

Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology

Volumn 148, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 83-90

  Rustemeyer, T ^a   De Groot, J ^a   Von Blomberg, B M E ^a   Frosch, P J ^b   Scheper, R J ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

Author keywords

2 Hydroxyethyl methacrylate; 2 Hydroxypropyl methacrylate; Contact allergen; Cross reactivity; Ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate; Guinea pig; Metabolism; Methacrylate; Methyl methacrylate; Skin; Structure activity relationship

Indexed keywords

CONTACT ALLERGEN; METHACRYLIC ACID;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTACT ALLERGY; CONTACT SENSITIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS REACTION; DEGRADATION; GUINEA PIG; NONHUMAN; OCCUPATIONAL SKIN DISEASE; SENSITIZATION; SKIN ALLERGY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

EID: 0031906634     PISSN: 0041008X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/taap.1997.8304     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ashby J., Basketter D. A., Paton D., Kimber I. Structure activity relationships in skin sensitization using the murine local lymph node assay. Toxicology. 103:1995;177-194.
2. Bean T. A., Wright W. D., Tong P. Y., Eick J. D., Youtree D. M. Acetylcholinesterase degradation of a series of ten methacrylate monomers. J. Dent. Res. 74:1995.
3. Bean T. A., Zhuang W., Tong P. Y., Eick J. D., Youtree D. M. Differentiating enzymatic breakdown of dimethacrylate polymers from leached monomers. J. Dent. Res. 72:1993;932.
4. Bean T. A., Zhuang W., Tong P. Y., Eick J. D., Youtree D. M. Effect of esterase on methacrylates and methacrylate polymers in an enzyme simulator for biodurability and biocompatibility testing. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 28:1994;59-63.
5. Björkner B. Contact allergy to 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (2-HPMA) in an ultraviolet curable ink. Acta Derm. Venereol. (Stockholm). 64:1984;264-276.
6. Cavelier C., Jelen G., Hervé-Bazin B., Foussereau J. Irritation et allergie aux acrylates et méthacrylates. Première partie. Monoacrylates et monométhacrylates simples. Ann. Dermatol. Venerol. (Paris). 108:1981;549-556.
7. Chung C. W., Giles A. L. Sensitization potential of methyl, ethyl, andn. J. Invest. Dermatol. 68:1977;187-190.
8. Coopman S., Degreef H., Dooms-Goossens A. E. Identification of cross-reaction patterns in allergic contact dermatitis from topical corticosteroids. Br. J. Dermatol. 121:1989;27-34.
9. Engelhardt J. P., Grün L. Das Verhalten von Mikroorganismen gegenüber Methylmethakrylat, Vernetzer und Weichmacher. Dtsch. Zahnärztl. Z. 27:1972;466-473.
10. Estlander T. Occupational skin disease in Finland. Observations made during 1974-1988 at the Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki. Acta Derm. Venereol. 70:1990;1-85.
11. Frosch P. J., Duncan S., Kligman A. M. Cutaneous biometrics. I. The DMSO test. Br. J. Dermatol. 102:1980;263-274.
12. Guerra L., Vincenzi C., Peluso A. M., Tosti A. Prevalence and sources of occupational contact sensitization to acrylates in Italy. Contact Dermatitis. 28:1993;101-103.
13. Jaffee E. M., Thomas M. C., Huang A. Y., Hauda K. M., Levitsky H. I., Pardoll D. M. Enhanced immune priming with spatial distribution of paracrine cytokine vaccines. J. Immunother. Emph. Tumor Immunol. 19:1996;176-183.
14. Johnson R., Macina O. T., Graham C., Rosenkranz H. S., Cass G. R., Karol M. H. Prioritizing testing of organic compounds detected as gas phase air pollutants: structure-activity study for human contact allergens. Environ. Health Perspect. 1997.
15. Kanerva L., Estlander T., Jolanki R., Tarvainen K. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by exposure to acrylates during work with dental prostheses. Contact Dermatitis. 28:1993;268-275.
16. Kanerva L., Jolanki R., Leino T., Estlander T. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate in a modified acrylic structural adhesive. Contact Dermatitis. 3:1995;84-89.
17. Kanerva L., Turjanmaa K., Estlander T., Jolanki R. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) in a new dentin adhesive. Am. J. Contact Dermatitis. 2:1991a;24-30.
18. Kanerva L., Turjanmaa K., Jolanki R., Estlander T. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from iatrogenic sensitization by a new acrylate dentin adhesive. Eur. J. Dermatol. 1:1991b;25-28.
19. Karlsson J., Wendling W., Chen D., Zelinsky C. J., Jeevanandam V., Hellman S., Carlsson C. Methylmethacrylate monomer produces direct relaxation of vascular smooth muscle in vitro. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 39:1995;685-689.
20. Kiec-Swierczynska M. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis due to acrylates in Lodz. Contact Dermatitis. 34:1996;419-422.
21. Klopman G., Wang S., Balthasar D. M. Estimation of aqueous solubility of organic molecules by the group contribution approach. Application to the study of biodegradation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 32:1992;474-482.
22. Magnusson B., Kligman A. M. Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig. 1970;Thomas, Springfield.
23. Mauri-Hellweg D., Zanni M. P., Frei E., Bettens F., Brander C., Mauri D., Padovan E., Weltzien H. U., Pichler W. J. Cross-reactivity of T cell lines and clones to β-lactam antibiotics. J. Immunol. 157:1996;1071-1079.
24. Munksgaard E. C., Freund M. Enzymatic hydrolysis of (di)methacrylates and their polymers. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 98:1990;261-267.
25. Mürer A. J. L., Poulsen O. M., Tüchsen F., Roed-Petersen J. Rapid increase in skin problems among dental technicians trainees working with acrylates. Contact Dermatitis. 33:1995;106-111.
26. Parker D., Turk J. L. Contact sensitivity to acrylate compounds in guinea pigs. Contact Dermatitis. 9:1983;55-60.
27. Rosenkranz H. S., Klopman G. The application of structural concepts to the prediction of the carcinogenicity of therapeutical agents. Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery. 1995;John Wiley, New York. p. 223-249.
28. Rustemeyer T., Frosch P. J. Occupational skin diseases in dental laboratory technicians. I. Clinical picture and causative factors. Contact Dermatitis. 34:1996;125-133.
29. Siebert G., Erdrich A. Enzymatic attack on methacrylate based resins of dental composites. J. Dent. Res. 67:1988.
30. Tobler M., Freiburghaus A. U. Occupational risks of (meth)acrylate compounds in embedding media for electron microscopy. J. Microsc. 160:1990;291-298.
31. Turk J. L., Polak D. A comparison of the effect of anti-lymph node serum and anti-granulocyte serum on local passive transfer of the tuberculin reaction and the normal lymphocyte transfer reaction. Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 34:1968;105-118.
32. Van der Walle H. B., Delbressine L. P. C., Seutter E. Concomittant sensitization to hydroquinone andp. Contact Dermatitis. 8:1982a;147-154.
33. Van der Walle H. B., Klecak G., Geleick H., Bensink T. Sensitizing potential of 14 mono(meth)acrylates in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis. 8:1982b;223-235.
34. Van der Walle H. B., Waegemaekers Th., Bensink T. Sensitizing potential of 12 di(meth)acrylates in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis. 9:1983;10-20.
35. Van Hoogstraten I. M., de Groot J., Boden D., von Blomberg B. M., Kraal G., Scheper R. J. Development of a concomitant nickel and chromium sensitization model in the guinea pig. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 97:1992;258-266.
36. Zanni M. P., Mauri-Hellweg D., Brander C., Wendland T., Schnyder B., Frei E., von Greyerzs S., Bircher A., Pichler W. J. Characterization of lidocaine-specific T cells. J. Immunol. 158:1997;1139-1148.