The power of the "A"-"Not A" method

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 343-359

  Bi, Jian ^a,b   Ennis, Daniel M ^a  

^a Institute for Perception   (United States)

^b Sensometrics Research and Service   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035429885     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2001.tb00306.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BI, J. 1995. Nonparametric models for discrimination methods and sensitivity analysis for triads. J. Sensory Studies 10, 325-340.
2. BI, J. and ENNIS, D.M. 1999. The power of sensory discrimination methods used in replicated difference and preference tests. J. Sensory Studies 14, 289-302.
3. BI, J. and ENNIS, D.M. 2001. Statistical models for the A-Not A method. J. Sensory Studies 16, 215-237.
4. BRADLEY, R.D. 1963. Some relationships among sensory difference tests. Biometrics 19, 385-397.
5. BRITTAIN, E. and SCHLESSELMAN, J.J. 1982. Optimal allocation for the comparison of proportions. Biometrics 38, 1003-1009.
6. DAVID, H.A. and TRIVEDI, M.C. 1962. Pair, triangle and duo-trio tests, (Technical Report 55). Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Department of Statistics, Blacksburg, VA.
7. ENNIS, D.M. 1990. Relative power of difference testing methods in sensory evaluation. Food Technol. 44, 114, 116, 117.
8. ENNIS, D.M. 1993. The power of sensory discrimination methods. J. Sensory Studies 8, 353-370.
9. ENNIS, D.M. and BI, J. 1998. The beta-binomial model: Accounting for inter-trial variation in replicated difference and preference tests. J. Sensory Studies 13, 389-412.
10. FLEISS, J.L. 1981. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. Wiley, New York.
11. FRIJTERS, J.E.R. 1979. Variations of the triangular method and the relationship of its unidimentional probabilistic model to three-alternative forced choice signal detection theory models. Brit. J. Math. Stat. Psych. 32, 229-241.
12. FRIJTERS, J.E.R. 1988. Sensory difference testing and the measurement of sensory discriminability. In Sensory Analysis of Foods, 2nd Ed. (J.R. Piggott, ed.) pp. 117-140, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London.
13. HOPKINS, J.W. and GRIDGEMAN, N.T. 1955. Comparative sensitivity of pair and triad flavor intensity difference tests. Biometrics 11, 63-68.
14. HUANG, Y.-T. and LAWLESS, H.T. 1998. Sensitivity of the ABX discrimination test. J. Sensory Studies 13, 229-239.
15. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 1987. International Standard ISO 8588: Sensory analysis - Methodology - "A"-"Not A" test.
16. KLEINMAN, J.C. 1973. Proportions with extraneous variance: single and independent samples. J. Am. Statistical Assoc. 65, 46-54.
17. MEILGAARD, M., CIVILLE, G.V. and CARR, B.T. 1988. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, CRC Press, Florida.
18. O'MAHONY, M. and ODBERT, N. 1985. A comparison of sensory difference testing procedures: Sequential sensitivity analysis and aspects of taste adaptation. J. Food Sci. 50, 1055-1058.
19. PENTICO, D.W. 1981. On the determination and use of optimal sample sizes for estimating the difference in means. American Statistician 35, 40-42.
20. ROUSSEAU, B., MEYER A. and O'MAHONY, M. 1998. Power and sensitivity of the same-different test: Comparison with triangle and duo-trio methods. J. Sensory Studies 13, 149-173.
21. SNEDECOR, G.W. and COCHRAN, W.G. 1967. Statistical Methods. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
22. URA, S. 1960. Pair, triangle and duo-trio test. Reports of statistical application research, Japanese Union Scientists Engineers 7, 107-119.