The power of sensory discrimination methods used in replicated difference and preference tests

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 289-302

  Bi, Jian ^a   Ennis, Daniel M ^b  

^a Institute for Perception   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033440813     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1999.tb00118.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. BI, J. 1995. Nonparametric models for discrimination methods and sensitivity analysis for triads. J. Sensory Studies 10, 325-334.
2. BI, J. and ENNIS, D.M. 1998. A Thurstonian variant of the beta-binomial model for replicated difference tests. J. Sensory Studies 13, 461-466.
3. BI, J. and ENNIS, D.M. 1999. Beta-binomial tables for replicated difference and preference tests. J. Sensory Studies 14, 347-369.
4. BI, J., ENNIS, D.M. and O'MAHONY, M. 1997. How to estimate and use the variance of d' from difference tests. J. Sensory Studies 12, 87-104.
5. BRADLEY, R.D. 1963. Some relationships among sensory difference tests. Biometrics 19, 385-397.
6. DAVID, H.A. and TRIVEDI, M.C. 1962. Pair, triangle and duo-trio tests, (Technical Report 55). Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Department of Statistics, Blacksburg, VA.
7. ENNIS, D.M. 1990. Relative power of difference testing methods in sensory evaluation. Food Technol. 44, 114, 116, 117.
8. ENNIS, D.M. 1993. The power of sensory discrimination methods. J. Sensory Studies 8, 353-437.
9. ENNIS, D.M. and BI, J. 1998. The beta-binomial model: Accounting for intertrial variation in replicated difference and preference tests. J. Sensory Studies 13, 389-412.
10. FRIJTERS, J.E.R. 1979. Variations of the triangular method and the relationship of its unidimentional probabilistic model to three-alternative forced choice signal detection theory models. Brit. J. Math. Stat. Psych. 32, 229-241.
11. FRIJTERS, J.E.R. 1988. Sensory difference testing and the measurement of sensory discriminability. In Sensory Analysis of Foods, 2nd Ed. (J.R. Piggott, ed.) pp. 117-214, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London.
12. HOPKINS, J.W. and GRIDGEMAN, N.T. 1955. Comparative sensitivity of pair and triad flavor intensity difference tests. Biometrics 11, 63-68.
13. O'MAHONY, M. and ODBERT, N. 1985. A comparison of sensory differenct testing procedures. Sequential sensitivity analysis and aspects of taste adaptation. J. Food Sci. 50, 1055-1058.
14. URA, S. 1960. Pair, triangle and duo-trio test. Reports of statistical application research, Japanese Union of Scientists and Engineers 7, 107-119.