Setting Biomedical Research Priorities: Justice, Science, and Public Participation

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 181-204

  Resnik, David ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; POLICY; POLITICAL SYSTEM; POLITICS; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DEMOCRACY; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); POLITICS; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH SUPPORT; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL VALUES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035377464     PISSN: 10546863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/ken.2001.0017     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Ackerman, Bruce. 1980. Social Justice in the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale University Press.
2. Agnew, Bruce. 1999a. NIH Eyes Sweeping Reform of Peer Review. Science 283: 1074-76.
3. _. 1999b. NIH Invites Activists into the Inner Sanctum. Science 283: 1999-2000.
4. American Cancer Society. 1997. Cancer facts and Figures. Washington, DC: American Cancer Society.
5. Arrow, Kenneth. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley.
6. Baily, Michael. 1994. The Democracy Problem. Hastings Center Report 24 (4): 39-42.
7. Baldwin, William, and Seto, Belinda. 1997. Peer Review: Selecting the Best Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 3: 11-18.
8. Bimber, Bruce. 1996. The Politics of Expertise in Congress. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
9. Brody, Baruch. 1995. Ethical Issues in Drug Testing, Approval, and Pricing. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Burling, Stephen. 1997. Prostate Cancer Becomes Latest Political Cause. Greensboro News and Record (17 June): D1.
11. Callahan, Daniel. 1997. Cloning: The Work not Done. Hastings Center Report 27 (5): 18-20.
12. CDC. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 1997. 1995 Final Morality Statistics. Atlanta: CDC.
13. Chubin, Daryl, and Hackett, Edward. 1990. Peerless Science. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
14. Collins, Francis. 1999. Medical and Societal Consequences of the Human Genome Project. New England Journal of Medicine 341: 28-37.
15. Daniels, Norman. 1984. Just Health Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. _. 1994. Four Unsolved Rationing Problems: A Challenge. Hastings Center Report 24 (4): 27-29.
17. _; Light, Donald; and Caplan, Ronald. 1996. Benchmarks of Fairness for Health Care Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Diabetes Forecast. 1998. Climbing the Hill: Diabetes Research Drive Now Focuses on Congress. Diabetes Forecast 51 (5): 37.
19. Dresser, Rebecca. 1992. Wanted: Single, White Male for Research. Hastings Center Report 22 (1): 24-29.
20. _. 1998. Setting Priorities for Science Support. Hastings Center Report 28 (3): 21-23.
21. Eastman, Philip. 1997. IOM Study Will Probe NIH-Supported Cancer Research Affecting Minorities. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 89: 685.
22. Fliesler, Stephen. 1997. Rethinking Grant Peer Review. Science 275: 1399.
23. Gerth, John, and Stolberg, Stephen. 2000. Drug Firms Reap Profits on Tax-Backed Research. New York Times (23 April): A1, A20-A21.
24. Gross, Cary; Anderson, Gerard; and Powe, Neil. 1999. The Relation between Funding at the National Institutes of Health and the Burden of Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 340: 1881-87.
25. Gutman, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Hastings Center Goals of Medicine Project. 1996. The Goals of Medicine: Setting New Priorities. Hastings Center Report 26 (6, Special Supplement): S1-S28.
27. Helmuth, Laura. 2000. NIH, Under Pressure, Boosts Minority Research. Science 288: 596-97.
28. Hirschel, Bruce, and Francioli, Paul. 1998. Progress and Problems in the Fight Against AIDS. New England Journal of Medicine 338: 906-8.
29. Hrebner, Richard. 1997. Interest Group Politics in America. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
30. Hubbard, Robert. 1997. The Case Against Directed Funding. In The Future of Biomedical Research, ed. Claude Barfield and Richard Smith, pp. 97-104. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
31. IOM. Institute of Medicine. 1998. Scientific Opportunities and Public Needs: Improving Priority Setting and Public Input at the National Institutes of Health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
32. Jaffe, Hunter. 1997. Dying for Dollars. Men's Health 12 (7): 132-36.
33. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Kadard, Alexander. 1994. The Sex-Bias Myth in Medicine. Atlantic Monthly 274 (August): 66-70.
35. Kluger, Richard. 1996. Ashes to Ashes: America's Hundred Year Cigarette War, the Public Health, and the Unabashed Triumph of Philip Morris. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
36. Kopelman, Loretta. 1998. AIDS Activists and Their Legacy for Research Policy. In Health Care Ethics: Critical Issues for the 21st Century, ed. John Monagle and David Thomasma, pp. 251-63. Boulder, CO: Aspen Publishers Inc.
37. Kornberg, Arthur. 1997. Support for Basic Biomedical Research: How Breakthroughs Occur. In The future of Biomedical Research, ed. Claude Barfield and Robert Smith, pp. 35-41. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
38. Madison, James. 1964 [1787]. Federalist 10: Factions: Their Cause and Control. In The Federalist Papers, ed. Andrew Hacker, pp. 16-23. New York: Pocket Books.
39. Malakoff, David, and Marshall, Eliot. 1999. NIH Wins Big as Congress Lumps Together Eight Bills. Science 282: 598.
40. Marshall, Eliot. 1997. Lobbyists Seek to Reslice NIH's Pie. Science 276: 344-46.
41. _. 1998. NIH Embraces Citizens Council to Cool Debate on Priorities. Science 282:18-19.
42. _, and Lawler, Andrew. 1998. U.S. R&D Budget Becomes Political Football. Science 281: 16-17.
43. Mastroianni, Anna; Faden, Ruth; and Federman, Daniel., eds. 1994. Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues in Including Women in Clinical Studies. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine.
44. McConnell, Harold. 1999. Funding for Health Research. The futurist 33 (3): 10-11.
45. McGeary, Michael, and Smith, Peter. 1996. The R&D Portfolio: a Concept for Allocating Science and Technology Funds. Science 274: 1484-85.
46. National Academy of Sciences. 1995. Allocating Federal Funds for Science and Technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
47. Nelson, John. 1995. Tragedy, Publicity, and Prejudice in Setting Priorities. In What Price Mental Health? The Ethics and Politics of Setting Priorities, ed. Joseph Boyle and Daniel Callahan, pp. 198-207. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
48. NIH. 1998. Setting Research Priorities at the National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
49. Office of Technology Assessment. 1992. Evaluation of the Oregon Medicaid Proposal. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
50. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association (PHRMA). 2000. The Pharmaceutical Industry's R&D Investment. Washington, DC: PHRMA.
51. Pinn, Vivian. 1992. Women's Health Research: Prescribing Change and Addressing the Issues. JAMA 268: 1921-22.
52. Proctor, Robert. 1995. Cancer Wars: How Politics Shapes What We Know and Don't Know About Cancer. New York: Basic Books.
53. Raines, Frank. 1998. Making the Case for Federal Support of R&D. Science 280: 1671.
54. Reich, Michael. 2000. The Global Drug Gap. Science 287: 1979-81.
55. Resnik, David. 1998a. Industry-Sponsored Research: Secrecy Versus Corporate Responsibility. Business and Society Review 99 (1): 31-35.
56. _. 1998b. The Ethics of Science. London: Routledge.
57. _. 1999. Privatized Biomedical Research, Public Fears, and the Hazards of Government Regulation: Lessons from Stem Cell Research. Health Care Analysis 7: 273-87.
58. Schroedel, John, and Jordan, Douglas. 1998. Senate Voting and Social Construction of Target Populations: a Study of AIDS Policy Making, 1987-1992. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 23: 107-32.
59. Shatz, D. 1996. Is Peer Review Overrated? Monist 79: 536-63.
60. Stix, Gary. 1998. Probing Medicine's Outer Reaches. Scientific American 275 (4): 52-56.
61. Tauer, Carol. 1999. Testing Drugs in Pediatric Populations: The FDA Mandate. Accountability in Research 7: 37-58.
62. Varmus, Harold. 1997. The View from the National Institutes of Health. In The Future of Biomedical Research, ed. Claude Barfield and Robert Smith, pp. 9-16. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
63. Weiss, Robert. 1996. Clinton to Announce AIDS Strategy. Raleigh News and Observer (17 December): A4.
64. Zimmerman, David. 1998. Weary Scientists Vow New Effort to Kill Alternative Medicine Office. Probe 6 (6): 1,7.
65. Zucker, Laura, and Darby, Michael. 1997. The Economists' Case for Biomedical Research. In The Future of Biomedical Research, ed. Claude Barfield and Robert Smith, pp. 42-66. Washington, DC: AEI Press.