Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 170-176

  Gladys, Sonia ^a   Van Meerbeek, Bart ^b   Lambrechts, Paul ^b   Vanherle, Guido ^b  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; WATER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTUM; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SILVER STAINING; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH ROOT; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTUM; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; RESIN CEMENTS; SILVER STAINING; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH ROOT; WATER;

EID: 0035376677     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. Recent trends in esthetic restorations for posterior teeth. Quintessence Int 1994;25:659-677.
2. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, et al. Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1996;27:775-784.
3. Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage: Review. J Dent 1992;20:3-10.
4. Kidd EAM. Microleakage: A review. J Dent 1976;4:199-205.
5. Bauer JF, Henson JL. Microleakage: A measure of the performance of direct filling materials. Oper Dent 1984;9:2-9.
6. Pashley DH, Depew DD. Effects of the smear layer, Copalite and oxalate on microleakage. Oper Dent 1986;11:95-102.
7. Bullard RH, Leinfelder KF, Russell CM. Effect of coefficient of thermal expansion on microleakage. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;116:871-874.
8. Heys RJ, Fitzgerald M. Microleakage of three cement bases. J Dent Res 1991;70:55-58.
9. Pachuta SM, Meiers JC. Dentin surface treatment and glass ionomer microleakage. Am J Dent 1995;8:187-190.
10. Doerr CL, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. Effect of thermocycling on the microleakage of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer. Am J Dent 1996;9:19-21.
11. Tate WH, Friedl K-H, Powers JM. Bond strength of composites to hybrid ionomers. Oper Dent 1996;21:147-152.
12. Alperstein KS, Graver HT, Herold RCB. Marginal leakage of glass ionomer cement restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:803-807.
13. Smith E, Martin F. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: A laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement. Aust Dent J 1992;37:23-30.
14. Retief DH. Do adhesives prevent microleakage? Int Dent J 1994;44:19-26.
15. Fusayama T. Total etch technique and cavity isolation. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4:105-109.
16. Gwinnett AJ, Dickerson WG, Yu S. Dentin bond shear strength and microleakage for Syntac/Heliomolar: A comparison between the manufacturer's and total etch technique. J Esthet Dent 1992;4:164-168.
17. Linden JF, Swift EJ. Microleakage of two new dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1994;7:31-34.
18. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, et al. Variability in microleakage observed in a total-etch wet-bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res 1995;74:1168-1178.
19. Hembree JH, Andrews JT. Microleakage of several class V anterior restorative materials: A laboratory study. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;97:179-183.
20. Kidd EAM. Cavity sealing ability of composite resin and glass ionomer restorations: An assessment in vitro. Br Dent J 1978;144:139-142.
21. Maldonado A, Swartz ML, Phillips RW. An in vitro study of certain properties of a glass ionomer cement. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;96:785-791.
22. Sidhu SK, Henderson LJ. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer. Oper Dent 1992;17:7-12.
23. Crim GA. Marginal leakage of visible light-cured glass ionomer restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:561-563.
24. Martin FE, O'Rourke M. Marginal seal of cervical tooth-coloured restorations. A laboratory investigation of placement techniques. Aust Dent J 1993;38:102-107.
25. Davidson CL, Abdalla AI. Effect of occlusal load cycling on the marginal integrity of adhesive Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1994;7:111-114.
26. Sidhu SK. Marginal contraction gap formation of light-cured glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1994;7:115-118.
27. Hallett KB, García-Godoy F. Microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations: An in vitro study. Dent Mater 1993;9:306-311.
28. Reich E, Völkl H. Randqualität von Zahnhalsfüllungen aus lichthärtenden Glasionomerzementen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1994;49:263-266.
29. Wu W, Cobb E, Dermann K, et al. Detecting margin leakage of dental composite restorations. J Biomed Mat Res 1983;17:37-43.
30. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to the configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66: 1636-1639.
31. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, et al. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions. Dent Mater 1998;14:294-306.
32. Oliver CM, Abbott PV. Entrapped air and its effects on dye penetration of voids. Endodont Dent Traumatol 1991;7:135-138.
33. Pathomvanich S, Edmunds DH. Variation in the microleakage produced by four different techniques in root fillings in a simulated root canal model. Int Endod J 1996;29:156-162.
34. Tay FR, Pang KM, Gwinnett AJ, et al. A method for microleakage evaluation along the dentin/restorative interface. Am J Dent 1995;8:105-108.
35. Swift EJ Jr, Pawlus MA, Vargas MA, et al. Depth of cure of resin-modified glass ionomers. Dent Mater 1995;11:196-200.
36. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Gladys S, et al. Enamel and dentin adhesion. In: Schwartz R, Summitt JB, Robbins JW. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. A contemporary approach. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996; 141-186.
37. nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomers. Philadelphia: International Symposia in Dentistry, 1994; 101-122.
38. Trushkowsky RD, Gwinnett AJ. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1996;9:96-99.
39. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:297-300.
40. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stresses in composite for two different curing modes. Dent Mater 1993;9:2-5.
41. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, et al. A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996;21:17-24.
42. Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures. Am J Dent 1999;11:113-130.
43. Porte A, Lutz F, Lund M, et al. Cavity designs for composite resins. Oper Dent 1984;9:50-56.
44. Cortés O, García-Godoy F, Boj JR. Bond strength of resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements after enamel etching. Am J Dent 1993;6:299-301.
45. Fritz U, Finger W, Uno S. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: Bonding to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 1996;12:161-166.
46. Haller B, Moll K, Hofmann N, et al. Initiale Scherhaftfestigkeit von Glas-ionomer-Komposit-Hybridmaterialien an konditioniertem und unkonditioniertem Schmelz. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1997;52:680-684.
47. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, et al. Factors influencing clinically successful bonding to dentin and enamel. Am J Dent 2000; In press.
48. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res 2000;79:709-714.
49. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, et al. Mechanism of bonding of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin. J Dent Res 1998;77:911 (Abstr 2236).
50. Asmussen E, Munksgaard EC. Bonding of restorative resins to dentine: Status of dentine adhesives and impact on cavity design and filling techniques. Int Dent J 1988;38:97-104.
51. Attin T, Buchalla W, Kielbassa AM, et al. Curing shrinkage and volumetric changes of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1995;11:359-362.
52. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:658-664.
53. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, et al. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997;76:883-894.
54. Alster D, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, et al. The dependence of shrinkage stress reduction on porosity concentration in thin resin layers. J Dent Res 1992;71:1619-1622.
55. Davidson CL, Van Zeghbroeck L, Feilzer AJ. Destructive stresses in adhesive luting cements. J Dent Res 1991;70:880-882.
56. Hinoura K, Miyazaki M, Onose H. Dentin bond strength of light-cured glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1991;70:1542-1544.
57. García-Godoy F, Rodríguez M, Barbería E. Dentin bond strength of fluoride-releasing materials. Am J Dent 1996;9:80-82.
58. Mixon JM, Eick JD, Chappell RP, et al. Comparison of two-surface and multi-surface scoring methodologies for in vitro microleakage studies. Am J Dent 1991;9:96-99.
59. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater 1992;8:310-319.