Four-year evaluation of the effect of 10% polyacrylic acid or water rinsing pretreatment on retention of glass polyalkenoate cement

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 64-66

  Van Dijken, J W V ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Conditioning; Dentin; Glass ionomer

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; CARBOPOL 940; CHEMFIL II; GLASS IONOMER; WATER;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH DISEASE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ACRYLIC RESINS; ADULT; AGED; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TOOTH ABRASION; TOOTH EROSION; WATER;

EID: 0030078037     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: 16000722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00047.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. GLANTZ PO. Adhesion to teeth. Int Dent J 1977; 27: 324332.
2. POWIS DR, FOLLERAS T, MERSON SA, WILSON AD. Improved adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to dentin and enamel. J Dent Res 1982; 61: 1416-1422.
3. LACEFIELD WR, PEINDL MC, RETIEF DH. Tensile bond strength of a glass ionomer cement. J Prosth Dent 1985; 53: 194-198.
4. VAN DUKEN JWV. Three year evaluation of surface conditioning on bonding of glass ionomer cement in cervical abrasion lesions. Scand J Dent Res 1992; 100: 133-135.
5. VAN DUKEN JWV. The effect of cavity pretreatment procedures on dentin bonding: a four year clinical evaluation. J Prosth Dent 1990; 64: 148-152.
6. WALLS AWG. Glass polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) cements: a review. J Dent 1986; 14: 231-246.
7. VAN DUKEN JWV. A 3-year evaluation of Gluma and Gluma/ Scotchbond for restoration of cervical lesions. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98: 341-344.
8. VAN DUKEN JWV. Klinisch gedrag van dentine-adhesieven. Tcmdartspraktijk 1993; 14: 27-31
9. VAN DUKEN JWV. Clinical evaluation of four dentin bonding agents in class V abrasion lesions. A four-year follow up. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 319-324.
10. TYAS MJ. The effect of dentin conditioning with polyacrylic acid on the clinical performance of glass ionomer cement 3 year results. Aitstr Dent J 1994; 39: 220-227.
11. BARAKAT MM, POWERS JM. In vitro bond strength of cements to treated teeth. Aitstr Dent J 1986; 31:415-19
12. PEUTZFELDT A, ASMUSSEN E. Effect of polyacrylic acid treatment of dentin on adhesion of glass ionomer cement. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 337-341.
13. WHITE GJ, BEECH DR, TYAS MJ. Dentin smear layer: an asset or a liability for bonding. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 379-383.
14. MOUNT GJ. Adhesion of glass ionomer in the clinical environment. Oper Dent 1991; 16: 141-148.
15. PEUTZFELDT A, ASMUSSEN E. Bonding and gap formation of glass ionomer cement used in conjunction with composite resin. Acta Odontol Scand 1989; 47: 141-148.
16. BARGHI N, KNIGHT GT, BERRY TO. Comparing two methods of moisture control in bonding to enamel: a clinical study. Oper Dent 1991; 16: 130-135.
17. JOHNSON ME, BURGESS JO, HERMESCH CB, BUIKEMA DJ. Saliva contamination of dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 205-210.
18. HANSEN EK, MUNKSGAARD EC. Saliva contamination vs. efficacy of dentin bonding agents. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 329333.
19. VAN MEERBEEK B, PEU.MANS M, VERSCHUREN M. 1. Clinical status often dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1690-1702.