Factors Influencing the Predictability of Soft Tissue Profile Changes Following Mandibular Setback Surgery

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 216-227

  Mobarak, Karim A ^a   Krogstad, Olaf ^a   Espeland, Lisen ^a   Lyberg, Torstein ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b ULLEVÅL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy; Class III malocclusion; Computerized predictions; Orthognathic surgery; Videoimaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; FACE; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LIP; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROGNATHIA; PROGNOSIS; RECURRENT DISEASE; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; FACE; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; LIP; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MANDIBLE; PROGNATHISM; PROGNOSIS; RECURRENCE; SEX FACTORS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0035375806     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Sarver DM. Video-imaging and treatment presentation: medico-legal implications and patient perception. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;112:360-363.
2. Fromm B, Lundberg M. The soft tissue facial profile before and after surgical correction of mandibular protrusion. Acta Odontol Scand. 1970;28:157-177.
3. Wisth PJ. Integumental profile changes caused by surgical treatment of mandibular protrusion. Int J Oral Surg. 1975;4:32-39.
4. Weinstein S, Harris EF, Archer SY. Lip morphology and area changes associated with surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Rehab. 1982;9:335-354.
5. Wisth PJ. Pre-and postsurgical face morphology of patients with mandibular prognathism [thesis]. Bergen: University of Bergen; 1986.
6. Bjørk N, Eliasson S, Wictorin L. Changes of facial profile after surgical treatment of mandibular protrusion. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;5:41-46.
7. Robinson SW, Speidel TM, Isaacson RJ, Worms FW. Soft tissue profile change produced by reduction of mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod. 1972;42:227-235.
8. Hershey HG, Smith LH. Soft tissue profile change associated with surgical correction of the prognathic mandible. Am J Orthod. 1974;65:483-502.
9. Lines PA, Steinhäuser WW. Soft tissue changes in relationship to movement of hard tissue structures in orthognathic surgery: a preliminary report. J Oral Surg. 1974;32:891-896.
10. Suckiel JM, Kohn MW. Soft tissue changes related to the surgical management of mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod. 1978;73: 676-680.
11. Kajikawa Y. Changes in soft tissue profile after surgical correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. J Oral Surg. 1979;37:167-174.
12. Willmot DR. Soft tissue profile changes following correction of Class III malocclusions by mandibular surgery. Br J Orthod. 1981;8:175-181.
13. Fanibunda KB. Changes in the facial profile following correction for mandibular prognathism. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989; 27:277-286.
14. Lew KK, Loh FC, Yeo JF, Loh HS. Evaluation of soft tissue profile following intraoral ramus osteotomy in Chinese adults with mandibular prognathism. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1990;5:189-197.
15. Gjørup H, Athanasiou AE. Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100:312-323.
16. Ingervall B, Thüer U, Vuillemin T. Stability and effect on the soft tissue profile of mandibular setback with sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1995;10:15-25.
17. Chunmaneechote P, Friede H. Mandibular setback osteotomy: facial soft tissue behavior and possibility to improve the accuracy of the soft tissue profile prediction with the use of a computerized cephalometric program: Quick Ceph Image Pro: v. 2.5. Clin Orth Res. 1999;2:85-98.
18. Hu J, Wang D, Luo S, Chen Y. Differences in soft tissue profile changes following mandibular setback in chinese men and women. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:1182-1186.
19. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Kärcher H. Changes in soft tissue profile after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and retropositioning of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:542-546.
20. Melsen B. The cranial base: the postnatal development of the cranial base studied histologically on human autopsy material. Acta Odont Scand. 1974;32:1-(suppl 62).
21. Dahlberg G. Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students. New York, NY: Interscience Publications; 1940.
22. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:382-390.
23. Bhatia SN, Leighton BC. A Manual of Facial Growth New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc. 1993:438.
24. Techalertpaisarn P, Kuroda T. Three-dimensional computer-graphic demonstration of facial soft tissue changes in mandibular prognathic patients after mandibular sagittal ramus osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1998;13:217-225.
25. Sinclair PM, Kilpelainen P, Phillips C, White RP, Rogers L, Sarver DM. The accuracy of video imaging in orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107:177-185.
26. Syliangco ST, Sameshima GT, Kaminishi RM, Sinclair PM. Predicting soft tissue changes in mandibular advancement surgery: a comparison of two video imaging systems. Angle Orthod. 1997; 67:337-346.