Predicting soft tissue changes in mandibular advancement surgery: A comparison of two video imaging systems

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 337-346

  Syliangco, Sandra T ^a   Sameshima, Glenn T ^a   Kaminishi, Ronald M ^a   Sinclair, Peter M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Orthognathic surgery; Prediction; Video imaging

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; ESTHETICS; EVALUATION; FACE; FORECASTING; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LIP; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VIDEORECORDING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ESTHETICS; EVALUATION STUDIES; FACE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIP; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 0030633677     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kiyak HA, Bell R. Psychosocial considerations in surgery and orthodontics. In Proffit WR, White RP, eds: Surgical orthodontic treatment, St. Louis: Mosby, 1991:71-95.
2. Sarver DM, Johnson MW. Orthognathic surgery and aesthetics: planning treatment to achieve functional and aesthetic goals. Br J Orthod 1993;20:93-100.
3. Sarver DM. Videoimaging: the pros and cons. Angle Orthod 1993; 63:167-170.
4. Hing NR. The accuracy of computer generated prediction tracings. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989; 18:148-151.
5. Legan HL, Burstone CJ. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1980; 38:744-751.
6. Attarzadeh F, Adenwalla ST. Soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment. Int J Orthod 1984; 22:4-13.
7. Bell WH, Proffit WR, White RP. Surgical correction of dentofacial deformities, Vol. II. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1980.
8. Proffit WR. Treatment planning: the search for wisdom. In Proffit WR, White RP, eds. Surgical orthodontic treatment. St. Louis: Mosby Year-Book, 1991:142-191.
9. McNeil RW, Proffit WR, White RP. Cephalometric prediction for orthodontic surgery. Angle Orthod 1972; 42:154-164.
10. Takahashi I, Takahashi T, Mitsuhiko H et al. Application of video surgery to orthodontic diagnosis. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1989; 4:219-222.
11. Turpin DL. Computers coming on line for diagnosis and treatment planning. Editorial. Angle Orthod 1990; 60:163-164.
12. Sarver DM, Johnson MW, Matukas VJ. Video imaging for planning and counseling in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 46:939-945.
13. Sarver DM, Johnson MW. Video imaging: techniques for superimposition of cephalometric radiography and profile images. Int J Adult Orthognath Surg 1990; 5:241-248.
14. Laney TJ, Kuhn BS. Computer imaging in orthognathic and facial cosmetic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Clinics North Am 1990; 2:659-668.
15. Harradine NWT, Birnie DJ. Computerized prediction of the results of orthognathic surgery. J Maxillofac Surg 1985; 13:245-249.
16. Kiyak HA, Hohl T, West RA, McNeill RW. Psychologic changes in orthognathic surgery patients: a 24 month follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 42:506-512.
17. Phillips C, Hill BJ, Cannac C. The influence of video imaging on patients' perceptions and expections. Angle Orthod 1995; 65(4):263-270.
18. Sinclair PM, Kilpelainen P, Phillips C, White RP, Rogers L, Sarver DM. The accuracy of video imaging in orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;107:177-185.
19. Bhatia SN, Sowray JH. A computer-aided design for orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 22:237-253.
20. Thomas JR et al. Analysis of patient response in preoperative computerized video imaging. Arch Otolaryngo Head Neck Surg 1980; 115, July.
21. Proffit WR, White RP. The need for surgical-orthodontic treatment. In Proffit WR, White RP, eds. Surgical orthodontic treatment. St. Louis: Mosby Year-Book, 1991:2-23.
22. Quast DC, Biggerstaff RH, Haley JV. The short and long-term soft-tissue profile changes accompanying mandible advancement surgery. Am J Orthod 1983; 84:29-29.
23. Mommaerts MY, Marxer H. A cephalometric analysis of the long-term, soft tissue profile changes which accompany the advancement of the mandible by sagittal split ramus osteotomies. J Cranio Max Fac Surg 1987; 15:127-131.
24. Lines PA, Steinhauser WW. Soft tissue changes in relationship of movement of hard structures in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1974; 32:891-896.
25. Upton PM. Evaluation of video imaging prediction in combined maxillary and mandibular orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentof Orthop 1994; 106:451.
26. Dermaut LR, De Smit AA. Effects of sagittal split advancement osteotomy on facial profiles. Eur J Orthod 1989; 11:366-374.
27. Dunlevy HA, White RP, Proffit WR, Turvey TA. Professional and lay judgement of facial aesthetic changes following orthognathic surgery. Int J Ad Orthod Orthognath Surg 1987; 2:151-158.
28. Romani KL, Agahi F, Nanda R, Zernik JH. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people. Angle Orthod 1993; 63:175-82.
29. Burcal RG, Laskin DM, Sperry TP. Recognition of profile change after simulated orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 45:666.
30. Giangreco TA, Forbes DP, Jacobson RS, Kallal RH, Moretti RJ, Marshall SD. Subjective evaluation of profile prediction using video imaging. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1995; 10:211-217.