Lumen effectiveness multipliers for outdoor lighting design

Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 40-52

  Lewin, Ian ^a  

^a Lighting Sciences Incorporated   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLORIMETRY; ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; MERCURY VAPOR LAMPS; PHOTOLUMINESCENCE; PHOTOMETRY; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

LAMP SPECTRAL DISTRIBUTION; LUMEN EFFECTIVENESS MULTIPLIERS; MERCURY EMISSION LEVEL; OUTDOOR LIGHTING DESIGN;

OUTDOOR ELECTRIC LIGHTING;

EID: 0035372715     PISSN: 00994480     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00994480.2001.10748352     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage 1978. Light as a True Visual Quantity:Principles of Measurement. CIE Publication. No. 41. Vienna, Austria, 1978.
2. Lighting Handbook of the IESNA, 9th Edition, 2000. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New York.
3. Alman, D.H., 1977. Errors of the Standard Photometric System when Measuring the Brightness of General Illumination Light Sources. J of the IES. October. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New York.
4. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage 1983. The Basis of Physical Photometry. CIE Publication No. 18.2. Vienna, Austria.
5. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. 1989. Mesopic Photometry:History, Special Problems and Practical Solutions. CIE Publication. No. 81. Vienna, Austria.
6. Lewin, Ian. 2000. Visibility Factors in Outdoor Lighting Design, part 2. The Lighting Journal. Institution of Lighting Engineers. Rugby, U.K.
7. Adrian, W., 1998. The Influence of Spectral Power Distribution for Equal Visual Performance in Roadway Lighting Levels. Proceedings of the 4th International Lighting Research Symposium. Orlando. Lighting Research Office of the Electrical Producers' Research Institute. Pleasant Hill, CA.
8. He, J.,; Bierman, A., and Rea, M., 1998. A System of Mesopic Photometry. International Journal of Lighting Research and Technology. 30 (No. 4). Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, London, U.K.
9. Lewis, A., 1998. Equating Light Sources for Visual Performance at Low Luminances. J of the IES. 27 (No. 1). pp. 80–84. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New York.
10. Lewis, A., 1999. Visual Performance as a Function of Spectral Power Distribution of Light Sources at Luminances Used for General Outdoor Lighting. J of the IES. 28 (No. 1). pp. 37–42. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New York.
11. Bullough, J., and Rea, M., 2000. Simulated Driving Performance and Peripheral Detection at Mesopic Light Levels. In the process of being published. International Journal of Lighting Research and Technology, Vol. 32, No. 4. p 194–8. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, London, U.K
12. Rea, M., 1999. A Unified System of Photometry for Lighting Applications. Proceedings of the CIE Symposium:75 years of CIE Photometry, Budapest. 1999. Commission Internationale de 1'Eclairage, Vienna, Austria.
13. Berman, S.M., et al 1990. Photopic Luminance Does not Always Predict Perceived Room Brightness. Lighting Research and Technology. Vol. 22. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, London, U.K
14. Berman, S.M., and Jewett, D.L., 1998. Two-Dimensional Photometry for Interior Surround Lighting. J of the IES. 27 (No. 1). pp. 57–66. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New York.
15. Houser, K, 1999. Toward a Non-additive Spectral Weighting Function for Brightness Perception. Proceedings of the CIE Symposium:75 Years of CIE Photometry, Budapest. 1999. Commission Internationale de 1'Eclairage, Vienna, Austria.
16. Sagawa, K, and Takeichi, K., 1992. System of Mesopic Photometry for Evaluating Lights in Terms of Comparative Brightness Relationships. J of the Optical Society of America. 9A (No. 8). pp. 1240–1246.
17. Roadway Lighting Committee of the IESNA. 2000. Recommended Practice for Roadway Lighting. RP8–2000. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New York.
18. B1. Rumar, K., 1990. The Basic Driving Error:Late Detection. Ergonomics. 33. pp. 1281–1290.
19. B2. Berthelon, C., and Mestre, D., 1993. Curvilinear Approach to an Intersection and Visual Detection of Collision. Human Factors. 35. pp. 521–534.
20. B3. Crowell, J.A., and Banks, M.S., 1993. Perceiving Heading with Different Retinal Regions and Types of Optic Flow. Perception and Psychophysics. 53. pp. 325–337.
21. Berman, S., and Clear, R., 2001. J of the IES. 30 (No. 1). pp. 90–104.
22. Smith et al, 1994. JOSA A 11 (No. 2). pp. 506–514
23. Snowden et al, 1998. Nature. 392:pp. 392 and 450.
24. Gegenfurtner et al, 1999. Nature. 398:p. 475.
25. CIE Report No. 70
26. D1. Rea, Mark, Boyce, Peter. “Different Sources for Different Courses.” Proceedings of the Fourth International Lighting Research Symposium and “Vision at Low Light Levels.” Lighting Research of EPRI. Available from T. McGowan, LRO Director, 3574 Atherstone Rd, Cleveland Heights, OH 44121.