Two-dimensional photometry for interior surround lighting

Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 57-66

  Berman, S M ^a   Jewett, D L ^a  

^a Abratech Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001989193     PISSN: 00994480     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00994480.1998.10748211     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. LennieP., PokornyJ., and SmithV.C. 1993. Luminance. JOSA 10(no. 6):1283–1293.
2. BedfordR.E. and WyszeckiG.W. 1958. Luminosity functions for various field sizes and levels of retinal illuminance. JOSA 48:406–411.
3. WaltersH.V. and WrightW.D. 1943. The spectral sensitivity of the fovea and extra fovea in the Purkinje Range. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Series B, 181:340.
4. BermanS.M., JewettD.J., FeinG., SaikaG., and AshfordF. 1990. Photopic luminance does not always predict perceived room brightness. Lighting Research Technology 22(no. 1):37–41.
5. BoumaH. 1962. Size of the static pupil as a function of wavelength and luminosity of the light incident on the human eye. Nature, 193:690–691.
6. BermanS.M., FeinG., JewettD.L., SaikaG. and AshfordF. 1992. Spectral determinants of steady-state pupil size with full field of view. J of the IES 21(no. 2):3–13.
7. AtchisonD., SmithG., and EfronN. 1979. The effect of pupil size on visual acuity in uncorrected and corrected myopia. Am. J. Optics and Physiol. Opt. 56(no. 5):315.
8. BermanS.M. 1992. Energy efficiency consequences of scotopic sensitivity. J of the IES 21(no. 1):3–14.
9. WyszeckiG. and StilesW.S. 1982. Color Science, 2nd ed. New York:Wiley.
10. SandersP.A. and CollinsB.L. 1996. Post Occupancy Evaluation of the Forrestal Building. NIST Report. J of the IES 25(no.2):89–103.
11. BermanS.M., FeinG., JewettD.L., BensonB. R., LawT.M., and MyersA.W. 1996. Luminance controlled pupil size affects word reading accuracy. J of the IES 25(no. 1):51–59.
12. BermanS.M., FeinG., JewettD.L., and AshfordF. 1993. Luminance controlled pupil size affects Landolt C test performance. J of the IES 22(no. 2):150–165.
13. BermanS.M., FeinG., JewettD.L., and AshfordF. 1994. Landolt C recognition in elderly subjects is affected by scotopic intensity of surround illuminants. J of the IES 23(no. 2):123–130.
14. WardP.A. and CharmanW.N. 1985. Effect of pupil size on steady state accommodation. Vis Res 25(no. 9):1319.
15. Phillips Lighting Company. 1996. Lamp Specification and Application Guide.
16. VosJ.J. 1984. Disability glare:A state-of the-art report. J of the CIE 3(no. 2):39–53.
17. VosJ.J. and van den BergT.J.T.P. 1997. The large angle course of the disability glare function and its attribution to components of ocular scatter”. J of the CIE (In Press).
18. BermanS.M., JewettD.L., BensonB.R., and LawT.M. 1997. Despite different wall colors, vertical scotopic illuminance predicts pupil size. In Press, J of the IES. 26(no.2):59–68.
19. BermanS.M., FeinG., JewettD.L., BensonB.R., LawT.M., and MyersA.W. 1996. Lighting spectral effects on Landolt C performance is abolished by mydriasis. J of the IES 25(no. 1):42–50.
20. ColettaN.J. and EthirajanK. 1991. Interference fringe acuity as a function of light level. Inves Opthal Vis Sci (suppl) 32 (699).