RNA secondary structure determination and representation based on constraints satisfaction

Constraints

Volumn 6, Issue 2-3, 2001, Pages 201-221

  Gaspin, Christine ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Cliques; Constraints satisfaction; Determination; Representation; RNA; Secondary structure

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035367280     PISSN: 13837133     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1011433605905     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Altman, R. B., Weiser, B., & Noller, H. F. (1994). Constraint satisfaction techniques for modeling large complexes: application to the central domain of 16s ribosomal RNA. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, Stanford, CA: Stanford University, pages 10-18.
2. Antao, V. P., & Tinoco, I. (1992). Thermodynamic Parameters for Loop Formation in RNA and DNA Hairpin Tetraloops. Nucleic Acids Research, 20: 819-824.
3. Bessiere, C., Freuder, E. C., & Régin, J. C. (1995). Using inference to reduce arc-consistency computation. In Proceedings of the 14th IJCAI, Montréal, Canada.
4. Billoud, B., Kontic, M., & Viari, A. (1996). Palingol: a declarative programming language to describe nucleic acids' secondary structures and to scan sequence databases. Nucleic Acids Research, 24(8): 1395-1403.
5. Bron, C., & Kerbosh, J. (1973). Algorithm 457: finding all cliques of an undirected graph. Communications of the ACM, 16(9): 575-577.
6. Bruccoleri, R. E., & Heinrich, G. (1988). An improved algorithm for nucleic acid secondary structure dispaly. Computer Applications in BioSciences, 4(1): 167-173.
7. Chetouani, F., Monestie, P., Thebault, P., Gaspin, C., & Michot, B. (1997). Essa: an integrated and interactive computer tool for analysing RNA secondary structure. Nucleic Acid Research, 25(17).
8. Clark, D. A., Rawlings, C. J., & Doursenot, S. (1994). Genetic map construction with constraints. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, Stanford, CA: Stanford University, pages 78-86.
9. Dechter, R. J., & Pearl, J. (1987). Network-based heuristics for constraint-satisfaction problems. Artificial Intelligence, 34(1): 1-38.
10. Di, T., & Yee, C. N. (1994). A restriction mapping engine using constraint logic programming. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, pages 112-120.
11. Freuder, E. C. (1982). A sufficient condition for backtrack-free search. Journal of the ACM, 29(1): 24-32.
12. Freuder, E. C. (1985). A sufficient condition for backtrack-bounded search. Journal of the ACM, 32(4): 755-766.
13. Freuder, E. C., & Wallace, R. J. (1992). Partial constraint satisfaction. Artificial Intelligence, 58: 21-70.
14. Gaspin, C., & Westhof, E. (1995). An interactive framework for RNA secondary structure prediction with a dynamical treatment of constraints. Journal of Molecular Biology, 254: 163-174.
15. Golumbic, M. C. (1992). Algorithm graph theory and perfect graphs. Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Ed. Werner Rheinbolt, Academic Press, Inc., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers.
16. Gouy, M. (1987). Secondary structure prediction of RNA. Nucleic Acids and Protein Sequence Analysis, A Practical Approach, pages 259-284. M. J. Bishop and C. J. Rawlings, eds. (Oxford: IRL)
17. Haralick, R. M., & Elliot, G. L. (1980). Increasing tree search efficiently for constraint satisfaction problems. Artificial Intelligence, 14: 263-313.
18. Inglehart, J., & Nelson, P. C. (1994). On the limitations of automated restriction mapping. Computer Applications in BioSciences, 10: 249-261.
19. Jaeger, J. A., Turner, D. H., & Zuker, M. (1989). Improved predictions of secondary structures for RNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 86: 7706-7710.
20. James, B. D., Olsen, G. J., & Pace, N. R. (1989). Phylogenetic comparative analysis of RNA secondary structures. Methods in Enzymology, 180: 227-239.
21. Kiss-Las̀zlo, Z., Henry, Y., Bachellerie, J.-P., Caizergues-Ferrer, M., & Kiss, T. (1996). Site-specific ribose methylation of preribosomal RNA: a novel function for small nucleolar RNAs. Cell, 85: 1077-1088.
22. Letovsky, S., & Berlyn, M. B. (1992). CPROP: a rule-based program for constructing genetic maps. Genomics, 12: 435-446.
23. Mackworth, A. K. (1977). Consistency in networks of relations. Artificial Intelligence, 8: 99-118.
24. Major, F., Turcotte, M., Gautheret, D., Lapalme, G., Fillion, E., & Cedergren, R. (1991). The combination of symbolic and numerical computation for three-dimensional modeling of RNA. Science, 253: 1255-1260.
25. McCaskill, J. (1990). The equilibrium partition function and base pair binding probabilities for RNA secondary structure. Biopolymers, 29: 1105-1119.
26. Michel, F. & Westhof, E. (1990). Modelling of the three-dimensional architecture of group I catalytic introns based on comparative sequence analysis. Journal of Molecular Biology, 216: 585-610.
27. Michel, F., & Westhof, E. (1996). Visualizing the logic behind RNA self-assembly. Science, 273: 1676-1677.
28. Mittal, S., & Falkenhainer, B. (1990). Dynamic constraint satisfaction problems. In AAAI90, Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
29. Muller, G., Gaspin, C., Etienne, A., & Westhof, E. (1993). Automatic display of RNA secondary structures. Computer Applications in BioSciences, 9(5): 551-561.
30. Nakaya, A., Taura, K., Yamamoto, K., & Yonezawa, A. (1996). Visualization of RNA secondary structures using highly parallel computers. Computer Applications in BioSciences, 12(3): 205-211.
31. Nussinov, R., & Jacobson, A. B. (1980). Fast algorithm for predicting the secondary structure of single stranded RNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 77: 6309-6313.
32. Nussinov, R., Pieczenick, G., Griggs, J. R., & Kleitman, D. J. (1978). Algorithms for loop matching. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 35: 68-82.
33. Perrochon-Dorisse, J., Chetouani, F., Aurel, S., Iscolo, N., & Michot, B. (1995). RNA_d2: a computer program for editing and display RNA secondary structures. Computer Applications in BioSciences, 11(1): 101-109.
34. Philippe, C., Bnard, L., Portier, C., Westhof, E., Ereshmann, B., & Ehresmann. C. (1995). Molecular dissection of the pseudoknot governing the translational regulation of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S15. Nucleic Acids Research, 23: 18-28.
35. De Rijk, P., & De Wachter, R. (1997). RnaViz, a program for the visualisation of RNA secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Research, 25(22): 4679-4684.
36. Stefik, M. (1981). Planning with constraints (MOLGEN:part1). Artificial Intelligence, 16: 111-170.
37. Tsang, E. (1993). Foundations of Constraint Satisfaction. San Diego: Academic Press Inc.
38. Turner, D. H., Sugimoto, N., & Freier, S. M. (1988). RNA structure prediction. Annual Review of Biophysics and Chemistry, 17: 167-192.
39. Walter, A. E., Turner, D. H., Kim, J., Lytlle, M. H., Muller, P., Mathews, D. H., & Zuker, M. (1994). Coaxial stacking of helixes enhances binding of oligoribonucleotides and improves predictions of RNA folding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 91: 9218-9222.
40. Westhof, E., Romby, P., Ehresmann, C., & Ehresmann, B. (1990). Computer-aided structural biochemistry of ribonucleic acids. In D. L. Beveridge and R. Lavery, eds., Theoretical Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, pages 399-409. Adenine Press, New York.
41. Yap, R. H. C. (1993). A constraint logic programming framework for constructing DNA restriction maps. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 5: 447-464.
42. Zimmerman, D. E., Kulikowski, C. A., & Montelione, G. T. (1993). A constraint reasoning system for automating sequence-specific resonance assignments from multidimensional protein NMR spectra. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine, pages 447-455.
43. Zuker, M. (1989). On finding all suboptimal foldings of a RNA molecule. Science, 244: 48-52.
44. Zuker, M., & Stiegler, P. (1981). Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information. Nucleic Acids Research, 9: 133-148.