Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry. Part I

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 85, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 442-449

  Gross, Martin D ^a   Nissan, Joseph ^a   Samuel, Rellu ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIREFRINGENCE; BONE DENSITY; DENTAL CARE; ELASTICITY; HUMAN; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; MOLAR TOOTH; PHYSIOLOGY; SKULL; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; WEIGHT BEARING;

BIREFRINGENCE; BONE DENSITY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MOLAR; SKULL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 0035347623     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115253     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Sicher H. Oral anatomy. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1965. p. 92.
2. Caputo AA, Standlee JP. Biomechanics in clinical dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1987. p. 29-54.
3. Krause BS, Jordan RE, Abrahams L. Dental anatomy and occlusion. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1969. p. 225.
4. Dempster WT, Adams WJ, Duddles RA. Arrangement in the jaws of the roots of the teeth, J Am Dent Assoc 1963;67:779-97.
5. Misch CE, editor. Occlusal considerations for implant supported prosthetics. In: Contemporary implant dentistry. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book; 1993. p. 705-33.
6. English CE. Biomechanical concerns with fixed partial dentures involving implants. Implant Dent 1993;2:221-42.
7. Misch CE, Bidez MW, Implant-protected occlusion: a biomechanical rationale. Compendium 1994;15:1330, 1332, 1334 passim; quiz 1344.
8. Misch CE, Bidez MW. Occlusion and crestal bone resorption: etiology and treatment planning strategies for implants. In: McNeill C, editor. Science and practice of occlusion. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1997. p. 473-86.
9. Rangert BR, Sullivan RM, Jemt TM. Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:360-70.
10. Kinni ME, Hokama SN, Caputo AA. Force transfer by osseointegrated implant devices. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:11-4.
11. Clelland NL, Gilat A. The effect of abutment angulation on stress transfer for an implant. J Prosthodont 1992;1:24-8.
12. Clelland NL, Gilat A, McGlumphy EA, Brantley WA. A photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:541-8.
13. Deines D, Eick JD, Cobb CM, Bowles CQ, Johnson CM. Photoelastic stress analysis of natural teeth and three osseointegrated implant designs. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1993;6:541-8.
14. Brosh T, Pilo R, Soudai D. The influence of abutment angulation on strain and stresses along the implant/bone interface: comparison between two experimental techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:328-34.
15. Reiger MR, Fareed K, Adams WK, Tanquist RA. Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:223-8.
16. Reiger MR, Adams WK, Kinzel GL. A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:457-65.
17. Reiger MR, Mayberry M, Brose MO. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:671-6.
18. Clelland NL, Ismael YH, Zaki HS, Pipko D. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:391-8.
19. Meijer HJA, Starmans FJ, Bosman F, Steen WH. A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:147-57.
20. Meijer HJ, Starmans FJ, Steen WH, Bosman F. A three-dimensional finite element study of two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:271-9.
21. Meijer HJ, Starmans FJ, Steen WH, Bosman F. Loading conditions of endosseous implants in an edentulous human mandible: a three-dimensional, finite-element study. J Oral Rehabil 1996:23:757-63.
22. Lewinstein I, Banks-Sills L, Eliasi R. Finite element analysis of a new system (IL) for supporting an implant-retained cantilever prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:355-66.
23. Clelland NL, Lee JK, Bimbenet OC, Brantley WA. A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla. J Prosthodont 1995;4:95-100.
24. Benzing UR, Gall H, Weber H. Biomechanical aspects of two different implant-prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:188-98.
25. Kregzde M. A method of selecting the best implant prosthesis design option using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:662-73.
26. Lozada JL, Abbate MF, Pizzarello FA, James RA. Comparative three-dimensional analysis of two finite-element endosseous implant designs. J Oral Implantol 1994;20:315-21.
27. Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical loading of Bränemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:345-60.
28. van Zyl PP, Gründling NL, Jooste CH, Terblanche E. Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:51-7.
29. Baiamonte T, Abbate MF, Pizaarello F, Lozada J, James R. The experimental verification of the efficacy of finite element modeling to dental implant systems. J Oral Implantol 1996;22:104-10.
30. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, Felton DA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:633-40.
31. del Valle V, Faulkner G, Wolaardt J. Craniofacial osseointegrated implant-induced strain distribution: a numerical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:200-10.
32. Sertgoz A, Guvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:165-9.
33. Chen J, Lu X, Paydar N, Akay HU, Roberts WE. Mechanical simulation of the human mandible with and without an endosseous implant. Med Eng Phys 1994;16:53-61.
34. Canay S, Hersek N, Akpinar I, Asik Z. Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angulated implants with finite-element analysis. Quintessence Int 1996;27:591-8.
35. Ichikawa T, Kanitani H, Wigianto R, Kawamoto N, Matsumoto N. Influence of bone quality on the stress distribution. An in vitro experiment. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:18-22.
36. Measurement Group. Photoelastic stress analysis. Bulletin SFC-300-B. Raleigh, NC: Vishay; 1987.
37. Altay OT, Tsolka P, Preiskel HW. Abutment teeth with extracoronal attachments: the effects of splinting on tooth movement. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:441-8.
38. Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B, Van Roekel N. Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:326-34.