Meta-analysis using linear mixed models

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 102-107

  Sheu, Ching Fan ^a   Suzuki, Sawako ^b  

^a DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; META-ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 0035346242     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195354     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. AGRESTI, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
2. BEGG, C. B. (1994). Publication bias. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 399-409). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
3. BROWN, H. K., & KEMPTON, R. A. (1994). The application of REML in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 13, 1601-1617.
4. DERSIMONIAN, R., & LAIRD, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7, 177-188.
5. HADDOCK, C. K., RINDSKOPF, D., & SHADISH, W. R. (1998). Meta-analysis using odds ratio as effect size measure: A primer on methods and issues. Psychological Methods, 3, 339-353.
6. HASSELBLAD, V., & HEDGES, L. V. (1995). Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 167-178.
7. HEDGES, L. V., & OLKIN, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego: Academic Press.
8. HEDGES, L. V., & VEVEA, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504.
9. HYDE, J. S. (1981). How large are cognitive gender differences: A meta-analysis using omega and d. American Psychologist, 36, 892-901.
10. LIPSEY, M. W., & WILSON, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. LITTELL, R. C., MILLIKEN, G. A., STROUP, W. W., & WOLFINGER, R. R. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
12. NORMAND, S. (1995). Meta-analysis software: A comparative review. American Statistician, 49, 298-309.
13. PINHEIRO, J. C., & BATES, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. RASBASH, J., BROWNE, W., GOLDSTEIN, H., YANG, M., ET AL. (2000). A user's guide to MLwiN (2nd ed.) [Computer software]. London: Institute of Education.
15. RAUDENBUSH, S. W., BRYK, A. S., & CONGDON, R. T. (2000). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
16. SAS INSTITUTE, (1999). SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8 (Vol. 2). Cary, NC: Author.
17. VERBEKE, G., & MOLENBERGHS, G. (EDS.). (1997). Linear mixed models in practice: A SAS-oriented approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.
18. WANG, M. C., & BUSHMAN, B. J. (1999). Integrating results through meta-analytic review using SAS software. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
19. WARE, J. H. (1985). Linear models for the analysis of longitudinal studies. American Statistician, 39, 95-101.